Nicholas Carr's Essay 'Is Google Making USupid?'

Improved Essays
Nicholas Carr discusses the negative effects of technology in his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” First, he points out how constant technology use causes the mind to change. In discussing his mind, Carr states how it’s “changing. [He’s] not thinking the way [he] used to think” (315). In other words, Carr believes that the prolonged hours spent on the Internet correlates with his loss of concentration after reading a few pages of an article or a novel. Moreover, Carr explicates how the mind’s adaptation to operate just like the Internet is due to the immediate access of information. He further describes the plasticity of the brain by elucidating that “nerve cells routinely break old connections and form new ones” (319). Carr’s point is that since the brain spends more time focused on a computer, the neurons adapt to function like a computer’s inner mechanisms. However, Carr mentions that this increased time on the Internet causes the brain to become more mechanical. He explains that “our ability to interpret text” while on the Internet “remains largely disengaged” (Carr 317). In making this comment, Carr reveals how the Internet does not allow people to read and analyze information freely, in terms of how we think. The author is saying that reading on the Internet has caused him to only understand the direct purpose of the …show more content…
As a child, I had access to dial-up Internet. Because dial-up Internet cannot work at the same time as the phone, I spent my days playing Pinball on the desktop computer. During elementary school, I completed my projects by going to the library to research. But as the years passed and I went to middle school, I went to the library less and used online databases more. By the time I finished high school, researching at the library was nonexistent as I accomplished all of it on the Internet. My experiences show how the Internet became a haven of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, man has shown an unquenchable thirst for the fountain of knowledge. Theoretically, when man begins the search for a specific answer, the journey to the answer possesses the main thrill of the quest for knowledge. In Nicholas Carr's essay "Is Google Making Us Stupid", he recounts a plethora of explanations and instances in which to support the idea suggested in the title. To add a personal flare to his writing, Nicholas Carr eloquently describes the effect that Google has had upon his once immersive literary nature.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr uses his own experiences with Google to inform his readers of the negative effects that it has had on our society so far and the damage it can cause in the future. His example includes how Google has allowed our society to adapt to bad habits such as skimming carelessly, as opposed to detailed analytical reading. He supports this theory by admitting that he notices himself skimming and finding short articles online because they tend to be more convenient. Due to the Internet’s convenience and access to abundant amounts of information, people tend to lean more towards skimming because reading everything the Internet provides us thoroughly, would take too much time. Carr's overall motive is to propagate to his readers that what he sees in the future is not acceptable and that we must do something to stop technology from controlling and negatively altering our cognitive functions.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Google-Making USupid

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, he discusses the new thought of considering the brain as a computer, feels terrible for the loss of profound concentration, and the scholarly incitement it accommodates our brains. Carr’s theory of technology making us dumber…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas Carr Rhetoric

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The way he offered their ideas in an almost sarcastic way like he didn’t want people thinking; he would ever believe the things they do. Then at the end of the essay, he uses arguments and expressions like “pancake people” and “haunting” (328) to create images in the reader’s mind of the destruction that the Internet causing on our minds. Carr goes back and says “I’m haunted by that scene in 2001,” (328) because the computer appears to impress so much and the humans seem to feel so little in the movie. Just before that he says that he doesn’t think that “artificial intelligence” (325) can ever replace human intelligence because computers can…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this statement she says that she sees the correlation between the Internet and the technology inhibiting a deep thought when reading. Carr was methodical when choosing his sources Wolf is a good choice as a psychologist is the studies the mind and behavior of others; also, it’s like Carr analyzing his behavior as well as his audience through Wolf. Another source that worked well for Carr was the story of Friedrich Nietzsches a German writer philosopher that with the invention of the typewriter he was able to write stories as his vision was failing him and made it hard to write stories. Nietzsches was able to write to write again even one of his friends noticed a difference in his writing style. Nietzches friend said to him “Perhaps you will through this instrument even take to a new idiom”.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I do not disagree that the internet may have made it more difficult to pay attention to the multitude of paragraphs, I find his conclusion that the internet has completely rewired our brains a bit out there. Carr admits “...we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition”, thus I find it impossible to take Carr’s insistence that the Internet causing people to take up “power browsing” more often to be a sign of anything bigger (Carr). Carr’s skepticism about the at the thought of the internet supplementing our intelligence seems unjustified, as people have been supplementing their knowledge with that of other humans, books, and many other sources of information outside of the internet for generations. The fear that Carr expresses of becoming technology reliant is rather obsolete, as the world is simply shifting from print books to the same information in PDFs online. If Carr sees no issue with reading books to gain intelligence or information, there is no reason for him to fear technology when it is improving ways to do this and many other aspects of…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of the time when I’m reading online I won’t actually read the whole thing I usually just skim through it and find out information because it’s faster and easier than reading the whole thing. Many people in school will look up questions on the internet just to find an answer to a question for a class and won’t really learn anything because they don’t understand why that’s the answer, but because it’s faster and easier and gives them the answer they don’t typically care if they’re actually learning. The internet is full of all different medias, so when I’m on certain sites I get distracted by ads or other things that interest me, if I’m writing a paper I often lose my place because a message or notification will pop up so I leave the paper and look at it. In psychology we were learning about the brain and how neurons create new connections and lose old…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because if people are constantly being distracted they can never truly learn material because they are not dedicating all of their brain space to it. The second Premise that Carr uses is the fact that our brain can rewire itself overtime according to incoming stimuli. Carr cites an experiment where a primate’s neural circuits are changed in response to experience. This premise is deductive reasoning because it leads the reader to come to the conclusion that the brain would rewire itself after long hours using the internet systematically making large portions of the world who use the internet more scattered brained. Lastly, Carr used the premise of the innate bias of the human brain to help lead to his main argument.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Carr and his friends have seen a shift in their cognitive experiences because of their time online with the expansive amount of information online. Carr mentions a blogger, Bruce Friedman, and he describes that the internet has altered with his brain, “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print,” and Friedman said that his thinking has taken this “staccato” sort of quality to it. Not only that, he cannot even read a “blog post of more than three or four paragraphs” without having to resort to skimming (Carr 93). This sort of behavior is something that the internet is teaching not just the young, but the average adult. According to Maryanne Wolf, reading is not a skill that we use as an “instinct,” unlike the natural urge to talk and communicate with others (Carr 94).…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the quick thinking skills that were instilled in us through the use of the internet, we are losing our higher order cognitive ability that was once gained from reading books. The quote by Carr is simply saying that the use of the internet can make us less interesting in terms of our thinking process. He provokes emotion through this quote with just the word “Sacrifice”. In short he could simply ask ‘Are we willing to be less attentive and in general less…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the leaps that technology has made, individuals’ reliance on screen technology has become so prevalent that it permeates all aspects of life, such as education and entertainment. Neuroplasticity is the theory that the brain is malleable and therefore adapts to environments and experiences in spite of disabilities, injuries, or old age (Doidge 2010). This allows screen technology to influence astuteness. Some scholars argue that screen technology positively affects cognitive skills, whereas others disagree. This essay will outline the debate of the positive and negative effects of screen technology on cognitive development.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr explains his experiences with google and modern technology. For example, Carr says that because of google, he can no longer read in-depth pieces of writing. This is the same for others as well, talking about his friends, Carr says “The more they use the web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (1). Avery Stroman, who wrote a paper regarding his thoughts on Nicholas Carr 's paper and how he feels about google says “I allowed the presence of Facebook, Twitter, and email to prevent me from reading his entire article without stopping. Without thinking, I switched from the article at hand to the internet” (79).…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr address that the internet is very useful but it can push us toward becoming more like a human computer. I believe Carrs…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Carr). I do believe that I was not connecting enough with his work because I had already formed an opinion before finishing reading the entire scribe. I found it difficult to stop with my opinion and be objective. Forming that opinion much too early on, did negatively affect me by not allowing myself a deeper understanding of the material at hand. I had to go back and reread Carr’s entire essay that was written on the topic of technology and what it could be doing to our brains, and try to absorb it more fully.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas G. Carr was born in 1959, and is the author of, 2011 General Non-fiction Pulitzer Prize finalist, The Shallows: What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brain’s. He is also the author of the highly debated article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in July of 2008. This article is about how he noticed that he had a shorter attention span and could not focus on long pieces of writing. He describes the neurological consequences of the internet, and how it is shaping how we read. When we skim articles we do not have a meaningful and memorable experience, we are simply extracting the main points from the text.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays