Mr Simpson Essay

Mr. Simpson has the right as a self-sufficient patient, to receive or deny the flu shot. Listening to what the family suggests and following their wishes rather than Mr. Simpson’s would violate patient-physician disclosure. The patient’s ability to self-govern and their right to disclosure are very important in this situation.
Personal autonomy is extensively valued. Recognition of its exposure in health care led to the addition of respect for autonomy as a concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy correlates with allowing patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. The patient’s right to autonomy should always be respected. Mr. Simpson does not show any signs of incompetents or being mentally challenged so patient’s …show more content…
Beneficent actions are done to help prevent harm or improve the situation of others. Physicians are expected to refrain from causing harm, but they also have an obligation to help their patients. Physicians are not expected practice such a broad definition of beneficence. However, the objective of medicine is to promote the well-being of patients, and physicians have awareness and knowledge that enable them to assist individuals. Due to the nature of the relationship between physicians and patients, doctors do have an obligation to prevent and remove harms, and weigh and balance possible benefits against possible risks of an action. Beneficence can also include protecting and defending the rights of others, rescuing persons who are in danger, and helping individuals with disabilities. Difficult ethical issues arise when the patient’s autonomous decision conflicts with the physician’s beneficent duty to look out for the patient’s best interests. This confusion can lead to an array of bad decisions that can potentially hurt the patient, which is the main thing that the physicians are trying to