The company also allowed the employee to return to work after his eleven week leave. In this situation, the company appears to have done everything by the law. They allowed their employee to return to work after an eleven week leave, which falls within the twelve week leave that he is allowed. The employee requested to be paid his salary for the eleven weeks he was on leave, but the company refused to do so, which they can legally do. In conclusion, everything was done by the book, and the company is not at fault for any wrong …show more content…
This situation would be completely legal if the 32 year old was as equally qualified as the 68 year old, but based on performance reviews, that is not the case. The situation states that the 68 year old lost out on the promotion due to his age, despite performing better at his job than the 32 year who received the promotion. This situation would violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. In addition, if the employee decides to take legal recourse, it would be unlawful for the company to take any type of retaliation against the