Making A Fallacy Research Paper

Improved Essays
Although they oftentimes are incorrectly used, a fallacy should always be avoided when making an argument because it should never be used as a tool to persuade. Because a fallacy is, to broadly put it, an indication or assumption of any false belief or any irrelevant belief, it is not reliable to include a fallacy during anytime which you are trying to convince another of something that is weighted with truth, which is what all ethical arguments should be composed of. Whether or not a fallacy was formed intentionally does not matter much seeing as how no matter the intent behind it, a fallacy will effectively and inappropriately deceive others. There are many different types of fallacies and it will be my goal to explain why many from the long …show more content…
A case where this rule of thumb is not applied is during hasty generalizations; a type of fallacy in which the speaker or writer has performed the mistake of jumping to a conclusion. (Rybacki & Rybacki 148). Although it has been deemed okay for an individual to make generalizations within an argument, said generalizations may only be approved when they are based on a hefty number of circumstances and credible information. (Rybacki & Rybacki 148). Another commonly occurring type of fallacy, transfers, are formed of three different types. Transfers may either be a fallacy of composition, a fallacy of division, or a fallacy of refutation. (Rybacki & Rybacki 150). All three, though their minor differences are evident, are all reasonings which are beyond what is intellectually sound. Due to their illogical claims, they are all inappropriate to use when creating an …show more content…
Avoiding the issue, whether consciously or subconsciously, occurs when one strays away from the issue at hand. (Rybacki & Rybacki 154). This is a fallacy which obviously serves no use when forming arguments. On quite the opposite side of the spectrum, a writer or speaker can give an abundance of information, though it be biased. An example of this is forcing a dichotomy which is any instance where the writer or speaker presents the audience with more than one choice, however, the writer or speaker forms his/her argument in a way which makes his/her favorite choice the forced favorite for the audience which is by no means ethical. (Rybacki & Rybacki 157). I have written on many available fallacies that exist in negative forms for arguments. Alongside these fallacy types are the reasons which explain why they are by no means a positive tactic to use in any argument, as they do not validate the argument nor do they benefit

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    An example of this is in the text, “It says According to a report by The Physician and Sportsmedicine, cheerleaders lose more time from their activity because of injury--28.8 days per injury--than any other group of athletes at the high school level.” The reasoning that cheerleading is a dangerous sport is strong enough to support the argument because many people break their bones and have to spend time out. Another example that the author does a good job of making an argument is when he puts in evidence from The University of North Carolina. This is evident when the text states, “ The University…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section One, Intro/Offense: Jay Heinrichs points out how rhetoric is an incredibly useful skill that dates all the way back to being started by the ancient Greeks and perfected by the Romans. As time progressed in about the 19th century rhetoric increasingly became less popular and has not been a large part of education. Heinrichs would like to show to people just how important rhetoric truly is. Rhetorical arguments are all around us, as the author notices the company that makes his wrist watch uses a form of marketing called “argument from strength”, simply meaning if something works in the rough it will work in the smooth. Heinrichs leads into a vey important part of a rhetorical argument, persuasion.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Book about Rhetoric: is it Worth Reading? Jay Heinrichs is a New York Times best selling author thanks to his book, Thank You For Arguing; what Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us about the Art of Persuasion . He is a leading expert in the study of persuasion and applies his knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos to construct his position. Heinrichs also brings to play what he has learned from his 25 year long career as a journalist, as well as his lifelong study of rhetoric and applies it to his book.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Case For Rhetoric Debate and argument are a pinnacle foundation of speech in the world. Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, is like the bible of rhetoric and argument. Heinrichs is a former editor of many different publishers including: Rodale Inc., and Dartmouth Alumni Magazine. His book, is the leading book in the introduction to rhetoric, and is used in thousands of classrooms every year.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Art of Persuasion and Rhetoric Language Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion by Jay Heinrichs is a compilation of tips and tricks on how to force an opponent in an argument to fall into the deception and guile of your mind and allow you to win the argument; or at least get them to see your side. The book has been published in over ten languages and reveals Heinrichs’s masterful skills of rhetorical language. To put it in another way, Thank You For Arguing explores the art of persuasion and deception, especially chapter sixteen, Know Whom to Trust, therefore Heinrichs’s book should continue to be used and analyzed.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The authors of Everything’s An Argument define the rhetorical situation as “The relationship between topic, author, audience, and context (social, cultural, political) that determine or evoke an appropriate spoken or written response.” Andrea A. Lunsford, John J Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters argue in their book that everything is, could have been, and will be an argument. In the first chapter of their book, they explain the different reasons why we make everything into an argument. The authors dig to find the different occasions for arguments.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The art of arguing has been around for thousands of years. We use it in everyday life, both in writing and when speaking. Arguing has evolved to contain many concepts; Some of the most important concepts are setting your goal, avoiding logical fallacies, and using rhetorical appeals. Setting your goal in the book “Thank you for arguing” is referenced as Cicero’s lightbulb. Cicero’s lightbulb is setting a personal goal of what you want to accomplish from an argument.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summer Reading Assignment: Thank You for Arguing The introduction of Thank You for Arguing covers a brief history of rhetoric, introducing its beginnings in ancient Greece and its impact on Roman orators. Jay Heinrichs details the effect of rhetoric on America’s founders, the principles used in the making of the Bible and the Constitution, and how it inspired Shakespeare and Cicero, as well as how rhetoric has faded since the 1800s. Heinrichs declares his purpose for writing Thank You for Arguing as to “lead you through this ill-known world of argument…to use logic as a convincing tool, smacking down fallacies and building airtight assertions” (Heinrichs 5). Heinrichs hooks his audience by using the very thing he teaches about: rhetoric.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric Analysis

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argument surrounds us. It plays “with [our] emotions, changes [our] attitude, talks [us] into a decision, and goads [us] to buy things” (Heinrichs 18). Rhetoric is the argument’s decoder. This section talks about the effectiveness of rhetoric on persuading the audience or adversary to agree with the speaker’s points. It is, as Heinrichs states, an “art of influence, friendship, and eloquence, of ready wit and irrefutable logic.”…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, writers can accidently use fallacious reasoning, which can make their arguments invalid and unreliable. Anne Fadiman and Rebecca Skloot have different and similar writing techniques. Anne Fadiman wrote The…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While reading chapter five, Fallacies of Argument, and chapter six, Rhetorical Analysis, there were key words that stood out to me that related to the podcast, Researchers Study Effects Of Social Media On Young Minds. Fallacies are argumentative moves flawed by their very nature or structure. There are fallacies of emotional argument, such as bandwagon appeals, which is when we urge people to follow the same path everyone else is taking. Continuing, fallacies of ethical arguments are important to think about when determining an argumentative writing piece; stacking the deck means that the person talking is showing only one side of the story, going with ethical arguments in writing. Rhetorical Analysis is the analyzing of how well the components…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However even though an argument may sound fair are logical fallacies can exist. What a logical fallacy is, is a flaw in one’s logical which undermines the arguments logical credibility. In one instance where this is the case…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative fallacy 's can be seen in everyday life from talking with one 's mom to speaking with their boss, the trouble is identifying these fallacy 's and being aware that they do exist and can affect oneself and the person they are speaking to. Being able to know the difference between an ad hominem and straw man could be the difference between winning one 's argument. To begin with, two quite opposite articles have been provided that contain a central claim about the Iraq war. One of these articles is written by Anna Quindlen, 'We 've been here before ', while the other one is by Donald Stoker, 'Insurgencies rarely win '.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuading someone is any means necessary to make someone believe your point, but where does it become wrong? There is always that guilty feeling for telling a little white lie to persuade someone even when your intentions are good. It’s difficult to go around the fine line of manipulation when we try to convince someone to do something. Living in today’s society it is easy to manipulate the truth when using our rhetorical skills. Rhetoric is any means necessary for persuasion.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Logical fallacies are part of everyday life, whether we notice them or not. Fallacies are the mistakes in our reasoning. One common fallacy is false analogy. In a false analogy, two objects, events or people that aren’t typically related, are shown to be similar. An example of this would be comparing object A to object B. If object A has property C, and object B has property C, objects A and B must be the same thing.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays