Ludwig Feuerbach's The Essence Of Christianity

Improved Essays
The Essence of Christianity was written by Ludwig Feuerbach. The book critiques Christian religion and the existence of a God. His Goal was not to demolish the traditional religion but to alter it into a “Secular Humanism” that he called “realized Christianity.” He wanted to get humans attention away from praising God, who to him existed as a projected image. However he wanted to redirect their love and devotion to all humankind. Humans created God by recognizing the respected values and feeling that a humans can possess. The will that humans have comes from the perception of God’s love. Than we imagine these values in a perfect form eventually putting them into our personal identity, which we portray as anthropomorphism. Therefore, we believe …show more content…
Who we identify to have human like characteristics. This process take place when humans in this case values and emotions that humans are capable of. Then invest the perfection that God has into our personal identity. When thinking about what Feuerbach view on anthropomorphism, it is hard to agree with him. Nobody can put a limit on one’s imagination or opinion. Therefore if someone wants to believe in something they have the right too. Without imagination the world would be confined and always looked at the same. Another reason to disagree with him would be because it is up to humans realize will and reason that God has. There is not a real distinction in nature. Meaning humans have the will to be inspired and God gives human the reason to be inspire. Furthermore, humans portray God as a perfect being but they know that there is not always positivity when it comes to religion. For example people commit sins such Adam and Eve did. God is seen by humans as perfect however within that perfection there are limits. Feuerbach wanted people to see that they did not need to worship a higher being because God is nothing to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I believe Feuerbach clarifies how humans project God when it is mentioned in the text that consciousness of God is equivalent to self-consciousness. This part of the text implies that God is a projection of human beings. I agree with Feuerbach’s theory of projection because there is no proof to show who God was and what his characteristics were. It is impossible for humans to be completely certain that there is a God. Human beings are able to assign truth to thoughts that lack proof in order to reassure themselves and have their desires satisfied.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals. A response that might be given to this is that agnostics and atheists simply need to be converted, not only to “save” their souls, but also to make them morally upstanding people. However, based upon personal experience, one does not need to believe in any god to act morally, and therefore does not need to be converted to a religion that has yet to be classified as myth (along with so many…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He also agrees that his intellect, faculty of understanding, memory or imagination are highly feeble and limited that of God. Descartes asserts that he is incapable of mistakes if he thinks about God due to the fact that everything in him is bestowed upon him from God. But he is capable of mistake because he is not the supreme being or if he contemplates Oblivion. He knows that the sense of reasoning he got from God is finite and subject to mistakes. He…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He bases it off of the idea that there is nothing superior to God or there is nothing superior to the Truth in which God is Truth. But we have no way of nothing what is superior to something else. We might look at something and think we are superior to it while if we saw the situation from it’s side we would see that it is superior to us it is just not showing that it is making us think we are superior. So, we have no way of knowing what is superior to something else. It also runs into the same problem with the good and bad argument that there is not universal superiority that we know of.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aquinas Argument Essay

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is because God does not possess human potentialities provided to human beings, which accordingly gives them the free will to choose between living up to the good nature initially brought to them, or doing evil (Creel, 2013). God, as defined by Feuerbach and Wiemean is just an “idea of ideal human potentialities; a natural force, which promotes and sustains human good.” (Creel, 2013). Therefore, it can be said that the subsistence of evil does not mean the absence of an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stoics believe the universe is intelligent and divide. They do not believe God created the world, but instead God is the universe. God’s mind is all of the thinking in the universe, which happens to be conscious. We are all apart of God and his mind. This benefits us because God gives us high moral status that other things in universe don’t have.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evodius believes that the certainty of God’s foreknowledge makes it impossible for an individual to act otherwise, which conflicts with an individual’s ability to choose what they desire freely. Augustine explains that this is incorrect as “God himself has enabled [ individuals] reason to think” (38b), allowing individuals the ability to decide for themselves. “God’s foreknowledge, which is certain…, does not take away [from an individual’s] will” (57a), but instead makes it “all the more certain” (57b). This statement contradicts itself as it illustrates that no matter the choices made by the individual the final outcomes will be similar to the outcomes foreknown by God due to his possession of divine foreknowledge. Thus, for this reason, free choice of will and God’s divine foreknowledge are inconsistent as the divine knowledge possessed by God is what ultimately what determines the future of the individual as it is the tool that assures the occurrence of an individual’s…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He first describes morality as a connection between people. He sees behaivor as the main component that builds up that connection, and clearly views religion as the best option to achieve it. Lewis then states that individual spirituality should be wanted in order to achieve solicitude and passion with God in Christianity. Lewis expresses his belief by saying, “You cannot make men good by law: and without good men you cannot have a good society” (73). People should desire a “good” spirit, similar to God, instead of being forced by the law of human nature.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Meaning Of Good

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though people view the word good as something that is of lesser value but still of some worth, it should be viewed as a synonym to perfection just as it is used in The Bible. Good should not be an adjective that is overused as it is today. It is hard to truly think of something as perfect, so the value of the word and what it is describing is thought of as better than something that is considered good. If we are to truly be good in God’s eyes, then his definition of good should equal ours. Our worldly perspective should not change God’s original intentions, and our ways should not conflict with that of the Lord’s.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays