Letter To Coca Cola

Decent Essays
H2:S2- Patty Acosta- The letter written by Ira C.Herber includes many concerns about his company which is Coca-Cola.Coca-Cola has been advertised with many slogans.In Herbert’s letter he is concerned for the use of the slogan “It’s the Real Thing”,in the book “Diary of a Harlem School teacher”and how it is connected to Coca-Cola of course because they have used the same slogan for their company.Ira C.Herbert reason to expressing his concern is to show is unhappiness of the slogan and not only disrespect his feelings,but his reasoning on why this can become an issue for the Coca-Cola company.In lines 10-11 Herbert includes how the people that will read the book with get confused.The evidence highlights the writer's main reasoning for getting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Ad Industry Veterans Honored with Cola Memorial” it is taking the time during Cola Wars, a critic from the Onion, a satirical website. The rivalry between Pepsi and Coke then compares it to a real war, but actually, intend to ridicule the soda rivalry. The purpose of this article was to denounce those who allow simple, insignificant things, such as beverage choice to become a heightened situation when there are tremendous problems in society. American consumers were mocked with the use of burlesque satire in order to help them to understand that there are more issues out in society than a competition between two soda’s company. Therefore, the Onion uses the rhetorical devices of client testimonials, distortion and hyperbole.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exchange of letters between Richard Seaver and Ira Herbert is a short conversation on the right to a slogan for advertising. Mr Herbert from Coca-Cola expressed his wish that Grove Press would discontinue their use of "It's the real thing" since Coke had used it long before Grove Press. Seaver's response was a sarcastic explanation of steps that will be taken and methods to avoid confusion. Because of the tone presented in Seaver's response , Herbert's letter appears much better written and more appropriate for the situation.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, on( line 5 )it directs, “We note with sympathy your feeling that you have a proprietary interest in the phrase "It's the real thing," and I can fully understand that the public might be confused by our use of the expression, and mistake a book by a Harlem schoolteacher for a six-pack of Coca-Cola. In other words, Seaver is stating that they understand the issue due to the use of the slogan about people getting confused in some way. This information implies to Herbert not being very convinced of Coke using his the slogan he had created and discussed with Severe to diminish the use of “It’s a Real Thing”. To further illustrate this idea, the author describes “it didn't occur to us that since the slogan is so closely identified with your product” (line 14). According to Seaver, they had no intention of stealing Herbert’s slogan.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ira C. Herbert, in his letter to Richard Seaver, executive vice president of Grove Press, claims that Seaver has stolen the Coca Cola Company’s phrase “It’s the Real Thing.” Herbert supports his claims by providing examples of where the phrase was used in his company’s advertising. The author’s purpose is to point out to Seaver that Coca Cola used the phrase first for advertising in order to stop Grove Press’s use of the phrase. Herbert appeals to his audience of Grove Press, the company who stole his phrase, with ethos by stating all the times Coca Cola has used the phrase for advertising in the past. This gives Herbert credibility.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in 1970, there was a small conflict between the Coca-Cola company and Grove Press because the book publishing company was being accused of using the slogan “It’s the real thing,” a phrase Coca-Cola had been using for approximately 27 years, as advertisement for one of their books. The issue here was that the beverage corporation thought this would cause some sort of confusion to the public, even though the two products were not related in any way. Several rhetorical strategies are used throughout the two letters between Ira C. Herbert of the Coca-Cola company and Richard Seaver of Grove Press, but it was the latter who made a better use of them by presenting a more convincing argument. In the first letter exchanged by the two companies, we have an executive of the Coca-Cola company, Mr. Herbert, claiming the slogan belong to them and that Grove Press should cease making used of it to advertise the book Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher by Jim Haskins.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the countless number of slogans, it is often difficult to determine who has the right to a particular slogan. As a result, companies often argue over the right to their slogans. The correspondence letters between Mr. Herbert of the Coca-Cola Company and Mr. Seaver of Grove Press serve to highlight one of these arguments. In the correspondence letters, both company representatives use various rhetorical techniques to argue their point of view on the right to use the now-famous “It’s the real thing!” slogan. Ultimately, however, Mr. Seaver creates a witty rejoinder through the use of sarcasm and mockery that is more persuasive than the seemingly logical argument of Mr. Herbert.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coca-Cola having been an iconic, refreshing brand for more than a century, must have been accustomed to copyright infringement. In 1970, the Coca-Cola brand was faced with the theft of their slogan, “It’s the real thing” by the publishing company, Grove Press for their advertisement of the Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher. The executive of the soda company, Ira Herbert, wrote a formal letter requesting for the Grove’s discontinue of their slogan as it threatened the brand’s originality. Richard Seaver, vice president of the Grove Press, wrote a letter in response to the request and unlike Herbert’s polite and serious manner, Seaver appeared to be far more arrogant. However, the difference between their appearances in the letters illustrates that Seaver is significantly more convincing.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name- Tizeta Rustin Class- English 1101 Instructor- Dr. Buell Wisner Date- 09/24/2017 Analyzing “Advertisements R Us” by Melissa Rubin The analysis by Melissa Rubin’s on the 1950 Coca-Cola advertisement allows readers to identify the main point of the ads easier.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, Herbet begins to describe to Grove Press the problems that can arise from them using “It’s the Real Thing” such as confusion among consumers and lost profit for the Coca Cola Company. This confusion can lead to Grove Press lose money because the consumers will want to buy a Coke instead of Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher. Herbert is looking out for the future of Grove Press. By Herbert explaining that “It’s the Real Thing” will “dilute the distinctiveness of the trade slogan”, Seaver, in his response letter, claims that they do not want “to dilute the directiveness” of Coke’s trade(Herbert 12).…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Often considered the symbol of democracy, cola proved an influential beverage during the Cold War. In Western Europe, the intake of Coca-Cola became synonymous with free-market capitalism, democracy, and freedom. Although some communist-supporters resided in Western Europe and tried to hinder the sale of cola, these accounts remain few, and often failed miserably. These failures helped boost Coca-Cola sales in these regions, as enjoying this drink was a delicious foreign custom that was becoming a key part of Western European life. In Eastern Europe, however, this beverage represented everything the Communists residing there disagreed with.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book then convinces the reader of its content because he or she has something in common with the text. Finally, the last question sparks emotion in the reader. When Gladwell asks if the reader is curious, the reader, regardless if he or she was or was not interested in the first place,…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Implying Seavers sarcasms once again which can be mainly seen as Seavers attempting to prove his point of why using the same slogan would hurt neither companies. In many ways the second letter written by Seaver was actually persuasive because it made the Coca-Cola representative at least rationalize with what they initially…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since he is aware, that the Cola Company did not trademark the use to “It’s the real thing,” he comprehends that they are fully in the right to use the slogan, even if COca COla has been using it since 1945. Additionally, he relates to what Herbert might be concerned about by sharing a similar experience, in order demonstrate that they ‘ understand’ the concern they may be…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Coca Cola Advertising is an effective message using happiness and to hold an audience’s attention through storytelling. Coca Cola uses family values also transmitted values in different ways, using meaningful…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2. The Uppsala model of Coca – Cola Company in China: China has been viewed as a potential market for many multinational companies in the world, including Coca – Cola, as its enormous population and highly growth rate of real GDP. To access this market, Coca – Cola utilized three different modes of entry throughout its expansion into China, which is over three stage of operation after 1979. From 1979 to 1984, the entry mode of Coca – Cola was a franchise, which was low-risk entry based on the Uppsala theory of internationalization. The bottling plants’ proprietary belonged to China’s state-owned enterprises.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays