Kant vs. Regan: Who Has Inherent Rights, and Why? Essay

1989 Words Jan 17th, 2014 8 Pages
CRAM Exclusive
Essay Sample
The difference between “right” and “wrong” is rarely plainly clear. Dozens of wars have been fought over the centuries that have been driven by differing moral beliefs. These rights, and actions motivated by them, are justified by a society’s collective morals, which begs the question- who decides what the collective belief of an entire society is? Some seem relatively clear—the right to life, the right to work—while others are significantly cloudier— how does my right to own property and

middle of document…

In order to further clarify the somewhat hazy difference between Kant and Regan’s stances, we must look back at Kantism as a whole and how Kant decides upon what gives value to a human life. Overall, Kantians agree that all humans have no value but rather are “receptacles of value.” It is not that we are humans that gives us any value or worth, but rather that we have desires, specifically a desire to experience and maximize pleasure in the absence of pain. Moral value then, in Kant’s mind, comes from action based off of action based on the desire to maximize the happiness of humans being treated as ends rather than means to an end. Regan disagrees with this, saying that subjects of lives universally possess inherent value and that this value is completely independent of the circumstances of any particular life. By being the subject of a life we are automatically worth something and that something is the same regardless of race, religion, gender, intelligence, or any other distinguishable human trait. This universal human value cannot be lessened without violating a person’s rights. It is almost as if to set the foundation of rights moral philosophers establish that every person’s first and foremost right is the ability to even have rights in the first place because of this inherent value. Because those in Kant’s school
CRAM Exclusive
Pilot62054Pepper

Related Documents

  • Essay about Kant vs. Mill

    action are not permissible according to Kant. Off of this idea Kant composes an idea of duty in which he states that only acting out of duty has moral worth and if an action is done out of duty alone it is morally good. This leads me to believe that Kant is implying the most important thing to value are rational beings, and that if rational beings based their actions on the feeling, right and respect of others it would lead to the best results for everyone who is rational. Basically those rational

    Words: 1572 - Pages: 7
  • Essay on Hume vs. Kant

    states man is a creature with feelings and reason let’s us figure that out.      Kant takes a different approach in his ethical theory and the understanding of morality and what is morally good. For Kant moral goodness is defined as goodwill, and that we as humans have a moral obligation to do what is right. He says that moral worth is seen much clearer if someone does things out of duty. Opposite of what Hume says Kant believes that feelings and

    Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
  • Kant vs Aristotle Essay

    (Rogers & Baird, 1981, p. 4). Aristotle compiled facts inductively as apposed to Plato's deductive reasoning. His method was to observe and draw generalizations on the basis of patterns perceived in many particulars. This method of problem solving has since become known as empiricism. "According to which general concepts are arrived by ascending inductively from sensory particulars (Lamprecht, 1955, p. 44-45)." Simply stated knowing is based on experience. Though rationalism was started in the

    Words: 1324 - Pages: 6
  • Compare Tom Regan, Carl Cohen and Peter Singer in Terms of Animal Rights

    “Indirect duty view,” “Cruelty-kindness view,” and “Utilitarian view” fail to protect animal rights, he promotes the right view, which is the inherent value view. The author states that all individuals, including human and nonhuman animals, who are experienced the subject of life, should have equal inherent values and equal rights while being treated with respect. In addition, Peter Singer agrees with Regan that all animals are morally equal, at least with regard to their suffering. Peter Singer

    Words: 824 - Pages: 4
  • Hume vs Kant Causality Essay

    have a necessary connection- we must develop an understanding of why a cause produces a certain effect. Hume's critique of causation is that we cannot see it, we must infer it. For example, two billiard balls, one moving toward the next demonstrate temporal priority because one ball is moving first. Secondly, constant conjunction occurs because the balls exist together spatially and constantly. But, there is no necessary reason why this happens. Hume asserted that we can imagine a world in which

    Words: 1777 - Pages: 8
  • Hume vs. Kant: Moral Philosophy Essay

    impotent in this particular. The rules of morality, therefore, are not conclusions of our reason" (David Hume 'A Treatise of Human Nature').      Kant saw it as essential that the will must not be the slave of the passions for moral actions to be possible. Kant differentiated two kinds of imperative statements: first, the hypothetical imperative, which has the general for "If you want to achieve P then you should do X"; and, second, the categorical imperative, of the form "You should do X".      Hypothetical

    Words: 1738 - Pages: 7
  • Moral Behavior: Aquinas and Aristotle vs. Kant Essay

    happiness or welfare in the act. To attempt to clarify an oft confusing concept, a good will would follow a law not out of fear of punishment or the joy of being seen as law-abiding but because the law is the law. It is good without qualification. As Kant puts it; “That action which is compatible with the autonomy of the will is permitted; that which is compatible is forbidden. That will whose maxims are necessarily in accordance with the laws of autonomy is a holy, or absolutely good, will (44)”.

    Words: 1359 - Pages: 6
  • The Right vs. the Wrong Essay

    Italian food you would be better served by choosing something with a tomato-based sauce rather than a cream-based sauce. If we are able to make a few minor adjustments to our decision-making process, we can gain a greater advantage by making those “right” decisions (fitwatch.com). Pollan explores the evolution of our society’s eating habits further in The Omnivore’s Dilemma in an interesting way that, in my opinion, is informative as well. The book is broken down into three major parts: 1.)

    Words: 1997 - Pages: 8
  • Who Has the Power in the United States? Essay

    the first major decision by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall about the relationship between the states and the national government. The Court upheld the power of the national government to establish a national bank and denied the right of the state to tax the bank. The Court’s broad interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause paved the way for later rulings upholding expansive federal powers. The state governments have reserved powers granted to it by the Constitution under

    Words: 1308 - Pages: 6
  • Essay An Analysis of Employee Rights vs. Employer Rights

    Drug testing within the workplace is legal in most places, and is a right normally given to employers. Most often, drug testing occurs during the application process, however, current employees of most private companies can be tested if the employer harbors legitimate suspicion. In jobs where drug use would pose a large safety risk, such as a job requiring the use of a vehicle, drug testing is often mandatory. Unionized companies however, must undergo negotiations if drug testing is imposed upon

    Words: 2230 - Pages: 9