Tom Regan's Abolition Of Animal Rights

Improved Essays
Tom Regan, advocates the animal right and he claims abolition of the use of animal in science, commercial animal agriculture, sport hunting, trapping, and all other ways that we treat animals. He argues that people must change their beliefs about the animal rights that is fundamentally wrong. The society need a serious movement for correcting the whole system of treating animals. He stresses that people should stop all cruelties to the animals. Peoples are speciesism, if they believe that only human have inherent and high degree of value, and animals have only indirect value. Regan argues in his article about utilitarianism and contractarianism theory and he mentions that a person or a theory is rational when they recognize the direct

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan argues for the treatment of animals to be the same as that of humans. Rather than arguing a utilitarian perspective, Regan posits that an inherent value exists within entities that are what he calls “the subject of a life,” or rather have the ability to perceive and to possess desires and to deprive these entities of their life without sufficient moral reasoning is unconscionable. While humans may be privy to a larger range of cognitive abilities, Regan argues that these talents are superfluous and that mutual respect must be equally enjoyed amongst all subjects of life. This implies that consumption of meat must cease and that subjection to research cannot unilaterally be applied to animals. Opponents to Regan’s stance argue that…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, testing has been run at the expense of animals to protect humans from a range of products and chemicals including pesticides, cosmetics, household cleaners, and vaccines. This testing, and abuse of animals has raised serious ethical dilemmas and a moral debate in deliberately poisoning animals for the sake of our betterment. Is there a possibility that a better way of testing these harmful products could exist? If we must test on animals, is there a safer way? The proposed Animal Bill of Rights addresses these questions, and should be passed to protect animals from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In every discipline, there are unique approaches and attitudes towards the elements that are faced within each job. These diverse approaches are adopted and practiced by those that are involved in them, typically based on what the end-goal of the job actually is. One such example would be between an Animal Right’s Activist and a Meat-Eating Activist. The topic on which they differ is on the killing of animals for food. In each of the above fields, there are rhetorical devices that are used to appeal to and persuade the outside world to agree with and support their beliefs.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The appearance of various right movements resulted in giving full specter of rights to millions of people and erased cultural confusion and tensions existed earlier. But the animal right movement faced us with another sort of cultural confusion. Some animal right activists believe that animals should be given more rights as creatures which can’t protect themselves. The arguments which the author brought to our attention were about how to treat the animals.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 150 billion animals are slaughtered each year. Compare that to the 13,000 people that were murdered just last year. Now obviously it is not feasible to take those two statistics into consideration when talking about the feelings of animals. But philosopher Peter Singer is right to claim that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. Australian philosopher, Peter Singer, starts off his argument by comparing the ethics behind women’s rights to that of animal rights.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believe an animal should be treated just like a human. This group is called Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC). The authors thesis is, “But more research and testing are needed and much of it must be done on animals. But will it occur? Not if the animal "rights" terrorists plaguing Huntingdon Life Sciences have their way (Epstein and Brook)”.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Defense of the Animals, the author discusses the need to protect animals and why animal rights activists are working towards improving the treatment of the animals in situations where cruelty and suffering are not necessary. As humans, we have become too desensitized to the brutality inflicted on animals. Photos of baby seals that have been clubbed to death for their skin and videos of the horrid living conditions of our meat products have become a common practice. Even many of the scientific studies are performed mainly for the benefits of the human cosmetic appearance rather than searching for a medical disease cure.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    New York: Ecco Press, 2000. Print. Singer, Peter. 'Animal Liberation '. Animal Rights: The Changing Debate.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Rights For Decades the American society as well as many others, have been participants in an ongoing controversy regarding animal rights and animal protection. This particular debate has raised so much havoc in the world today, considering activist for animal rights are very passionate and will not stop on the account of politeness to get a point across. A widely known animal rights group established in 1980, known as Peta are famous for throwing buckets of wet paint on a various victims wearing a fur piece of clothing to prove a point. Being an activist for animal rights opposed to being a non-activist has not only become two different beliefs, but two opposite lifestyles as well.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays