Change Of Heart About Animals

Improved Essays
By definition humans are animals. Humans kill humans and it is a massive crime. The question remains: why is that when animals are killed by humans, it’s completely accepted? As scientific research has revealed more of the nature of our fellow animals in recent years, many people over the world have debated and petitioned for a bill of rights for animals. There should be a bill of rights for animals because they exhibit humanlike cognitive abilities and emotions and must be protected from harmful abuse, but these rights must not blur the line with human rights. Animals must be granted a bill of rights because they possess humanlike intellectual skills and feelings. In the Los Angeles Times article “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy …show more content…
Nicholas D. Kristof explains that “[w]e disagree about where to draw the line to protect animal rights, but almost everyone now agrees that there is a line to be drawn” (Kristof 3). Kristof’s thoughts are very profound as it is widely accepted that animals are being mistreated, but many disagree on how animals should be protected and to what degree that protection goes. There must be a balance between protecting the welfare of animals and ensuring that human livelihood has utmost priority. In his letter to the editor response to “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Bob Stevens argues against the proposition of an animal bill of rights. Stevens points out that “[i]n nature, animals naturally kill and eat each other. If the hawk does not care about the feelings of the rabbit that it eats, why should humans be any different?” (Stevens 1). Stevens also makes a good point because the human race, like all other species in nature, must place its own interests above the interests of other species. Mankind must ensure that their necessities and livelihood is taken care of before looking after fellow animals. Ed Yong of SeedMagazine.com provides objective research and evidence for each viewpoint on animal rights legislation and its effect on medical research in his article “Of Primates and Personhood.” Yong quotes Frans de Waal who proposes that “we should use the new insights into animals’ mental life to foster in humans an ethic of caring in which our interests are not the only ones in the balance” (Yong 3). Frans de Waal’s proposition should be implemented to making a bill of rights for animals. The rights must not conflict with the interests of humans severely, but must invoke a sense of ethical respect for animals. The rights should legally ensure that animals are subject to respectful treatment, but not cross

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer,the author of “Animal Liberation”, talks about how he thinks animals should be treated and cared for. Singer provides examples on humans experiment on animals and treat them with the mindset of any other pet. Jane Goodall from “Animal Liberation” states that there will always be a communication barrier between animals and humans, making us unsure of what animals really feel. In my opinion, I agree with the author to an extent, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as you would treat anyone else. Moreover, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as any other living thing.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The source can be used to help those understand the terms and laws regarding animal rights and animal welfare. Summarize: The main topic of this source is that animals with higher levels of intelligence should have rights. Wise and the team of wise are trying to accomplish their goal of getting awareness of animal cruelty and animals rights to choose, in the aspect that they should have the right to live freely. Wise’s argument focuses on four chimpanzees used for entertainment purposes. He believes these animals shouldn’t be owned and should be freed to a sanctuary.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Animal Rights

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I do not fully believe that animal rights are completely equivalent to human rights, but I hold true to the fact that animals have the right to be treated humanely because animals do have basic senses and emotions. Regan does mention that animals can feel pain and suffering, and I do agree with his view on that. So, what would be the consequences of giving animals rights? The major consequence that I see about giving animals rights is that farm factories would have to be monitored more closely to ensure that animals are being treated fairly and humanely. This means that no animal will be subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you really believe that animals should have the same rights as us humans? If you think about this, passing a Bill of Rights for animals could go against centuries of human culture, increase the cost of food, hinder medical research, and may cause other problems. I believe that animals should not have a Bill of Rights. My first reason is that such a law would go against human culture because we as people run the world. Can animals even work, cook, clean, or even talk, think about it.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Ranim Habbal “I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights. That’s is the way of a whole human being.” Abraham Lincoln. Animal testing is a very controversial issue. Fellenz (2005) said that using animals is not a new activity that humans invented lately, but it is an old method ancient people used to do to learn about nature. Further, people used to kill animals for food; therefore, they learned anatomy and physiology.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since naturalist Charles Darwin determined that like humans, animals are sensory, which means they are able to experience the pain, people became more concerned about the pain humans inflict on animals. In recent decades, numerous animal rights organizations and activists have been emerging with missions to establish and protect the rights of all animals.They argue that animals and humans have equal rights; therefore, animals are born with the right not to be used by humans in any way. They also seek to end all human interference in the lives of animals, regardless of using them for food, fashion and cosmetics, entertainment, or science. While this context has directly…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This controversial topic seems to never end. Should animals have human rights? A supporter of animal rights may say that animals deserve to be treated, as humans whereas a non -supporter may say animals “are irrational and incapable of living in rights” (source). Although both sides of this topic hold evidence and strong points to back up their belief, I truly believe animals should have human rights. Animals deserve rights, and these rights should obliterate animal experimentation, abandonment, and abuse.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit. The modern animal rights movement has definitely impacted a range of concerns such as reducing the use of animals for furs and cosmetics testing, and…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ten Trusts Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Have the Courage of Our Convictions” means to follow your beliefs. The authors want you to obey these trusts, so that the world will be a better place. All these trusts are linked together. Only by following these trusts can animals and humans live simultaneously without causing each other harm. People must change their perspective on this world, and the animals in it.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays