Also in the Judiciary Code of Ethics, is
Also in the Judiciary Code of Ethics, is
2) Justice Shaw concluded two different rulings in his 1836 and 1851 cases regarding two similar “fugitive slave” scenarios. In the Commonwealth v. Aves case, Justice Shaw ruled that the “fugitive slave” was to remain in Massachusetts and therefore, become a freed slave. Justice Shaw ruled the opposite in 1851 and ordered Thomas Sims be returned to Georgia after he had escaped. Justice Shaw cited two different laws in his opposite decisions. In the case of Commonwealth v. Aves (1836), Justice Shaw cited the lack of the law of comity as justification for keeping Med, the fugitive slave, in Massachusetts and therefor not returning her to her slave masters in the south.…
The issue of whether the judge should keep his position or be removed was debated after the public become aware of his sentence. It is believed that the judge shouldn’t lose his job after one unfair decision. In an article written by Paul Butler, a law professor and former prosecutor called “Judicial Recall Will Inevitably Lead to Harsher Sentences” he brings up a point that if Persky’s records reflect a pattern of unfairness, then he should be removed from the bench. However, if the judge had simply made a bad decision on the case, then a recall is unnecessary. A judge should consider about how popular their decision is to the public because “[t]his would inevitably lead to harsher punishment because, politically, it’s always safer for a judge…
I appreciated your discussion of the Supreme Court. The Judicial branch often is a terrifying display of near sovereign power. In 1803, William Marbury was commissioned to Justice of the Peace in Washington D.C by President Adams. However, when President Madison took office, the commission documents were undelivered. Marbury petitioned the court to force Madison to deliver his commission.…
America stands for justice, nevertheless, equality but the Judicial Branch possess an amount power over Congress that overshadows this statement. The Judicial Branch consists of three levels; the District Courts, Court of Appeals and uppermost power, the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the Senate and Executive branch have the choice of who maintains the position of Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court still has the ability to subdue the other branches. Revealed in the United States Constitution, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision, in addition to a 2005 Political cartoon, it is evident that the Supreme Court subjugates the Executive and Legislative Branch.…
I’m delighted that we are both thinking alike. As I seen on the news how Turner was basically getting away with rape with such small charges, I thought to myself this system we call the criminal justice system is getting corrupted. In the article you stated, it’s not about race, but it’s about gender. Me personally, I believe if it was a female judge, he wouldn’t have gotten away with it that easily.…
Brock Turner vs. Moral Justice Rape, has been a thorn in societies side for thousands of years; women, men, and children have been victims of nonconsensual acts since before the formation of society. The first written laws against rape were first saw in Ancient Rome, and is still illegal in most modern societies today. Recently, In the United States and much of Europe, rape, is more critically viewed and can often have severe punishments. However, in the case of Brock Turner v.People, a young man was able to walk freely for a crime considered heinous for centuries. Because of Brock Turner, many eyes have been opened to how athletes and people of fame are able to get away with heinous acts with minimal punishments and justice.…
I could name off five others that I wouldn’t be surprised about’” (Persky). Aaron Persky was the judge who decided the ruling. He gave Turner a light sentence because he was intoxicated at the time of the crime, and he had a friend, who just so happened to be a girl, who had never felt threatened by Brock Turner. This was essentially stating that because Brock Turner did not rape one girl, he did not mean to rape the other and would never do it again.…
Politics have played a significant role when determining how White America views the black race as a whole. Over the years people have characterized and associated blacks as the criminals and predators of society. They relate blacks to drugs, violence, and crimes. As a result, they enslave and incarcerate blacks. They use their Machiavellian justice system and laws created by them to eliminate or impoverish the black race in the white society.…
The criminal justice system often is examined using political, organizational, or sociological approaches [or lenses] (Pollock, 2010). Asking [simply] whether something is legal [or illegal]…is not necessarily the same question as asking whether something is right [or wrong] (Pollock, 2010). The term “ethics” or “ethical” refers to something “being in accordance with the accepted principles of right and wrong that govern the conduct of a profession.” In the case of police officers, use of discretion, or a lack thereof, in the application of force has direct ethical consequences to which the objectivity of the police officer on scene is subjugated by the subjectivity of a review board after the fact. Actors at every stage in the justice process…
Is it fair for a Supreme Court Justice to follow public opinion instead of seeing the case through the law? Originally Africans were captured and taken to the United States by the Dutch in 1619. During the next couple of decades, more Africans and Caucasians were brought as apprentices and indentured servants to become free after their time was served. As time passed the Africans were no longer indentured servants, but rather moved down the socioeconomic scale around the 1650’s. They remained as slaves while, their white counterparts became free.…
The Judiciary Act of 1789, formally titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," was set apart into law by President George Washington on September 24, 1789. Article III of the Constitution set up a Supreme Court, be that as it may, left to Congress the ability to make lower government courts as required. For the most part composed by Senator Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, the Judiciary Act of 1789 set up the structure and ward of the administration court system and made the position of legal advisor general. But rectified at the time by Congress, the key format of the administration court system developed by the First Congress stays, all things considered, set up today. The act disconnected the country into zones…
One of the first acts of the new Congress was to establish a Federal court system through the Judiciary Act signed by President Washington on September 24, 1789. The United States Judiciary Act of 1789 was a landmark statute in the first session of the First United States Congress. It established the U.S. federal judiciary. The founders of the new nation believed that the establishment of a national judiciary was one of their most important tasks. Officially titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," was signed into law.…
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the Supreme Court, and with it, the notable power to deem federal laws unconstitutional. This Act was brought to light again in 1803, in the case of Marbury v. Madison. Judges were appointed by Federalist John Adams in his last moments of presidency, but Democrat-Republican Thomas Jefferson disagreed with them. Though the “midnight judges” had been confirmed by the Senate -- with prepared commissions -- President Jefferson ordered Secretary of State James Madison to not deliver the commissions. These “midnight judges” followed by sueing Madison in the Supreme Court, citing his position as the Secretary of State in arguing that he was neglecting his Constitutional duty by failing to deliver their commissions.…
In a country like the United States the power of the government is divided among three branches; the legislature, the Judiciary and the executive. Out of the three, the Judiciary branch is responsible for interpreting and applying the laws made by the government. Our Judicial system comprises of courts that administer justice in the name of the state. The Judiciary is meant to ensure equal justice under the law, but the poor and minorities groups seem to suffer in our judicial system. As mentioned in the book, Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson, minorities mostly suffer due to injustices like racial profiling and flexible sentencing.…
Ethics codes comparison paper Deanna Baker Class Instructor Date Ethics codes comparison paper Abstract Confidentiality, teaching and training, and community standards Ethics codes comparison paper Introduction A code of ethics is the heart and soul of any business or organization. The standard in which all business and certified activities are measured in the code of ethics of its memberships.…