Analysis Of Section 13 Of The Judiciary Act Of 1789

Improved Essays
I appreciated your discussion of the Supreme Court. The Judicial branch often is a terrifying display of near sovereign power. In 1803, William Marbury was commissioned to Justice of the Peace in Washington D.C by President Adams. However, when President Madison took office, the commission documents were undelivered. Marbury petitioned the court to force Madison to deliver his commission. The Supreme Court contended Madison’s refusal to deliver said documents was illegal, yet they refused to compel Madison actually to deliver the documents. The court’s reasoning was Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
Yet, Martin views this assumption of power, known as judicial review, as

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall Dbq

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When John Adams appointed Federalists to various judicial positions before his term ended, James Madison discarded 17 commissions for justice of the peace, rather than delivering them to the men appointed. Though many of the men did not care about this position, Marbury filed a suit in the Supreme Court, demanding the order of the commission. John Marshall ruled that Marbury had a right to the commission. However, during this ruling, John Marshall declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Marshall said that this law, the Judiciary Act of 1789, could not be used because it authorized an action which the constitution did not allow.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Marshall wrote the unanimous decision that stated Marbury had the right to sue. The Judiciary act of 1789 was considered unconstitutional4. The Supreme Court cannot mandate something happen. The Writ of Mandamus expanded the power that the court has under the constitution. The judiciary act of 1789 directly conflicted with the U.S Constitution.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Declaratory Act Analysis

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Thus, the Bostonians anticipated that a change of ministry would remove the source of their grievances and improve relations but were not fully aware of the empire’s capital. William Pitts called for the reapeal of the Stamp Act over the declaration of Parliament sovereignty in all matters rather than taxation. Thus, which began the Declaratory Act which establishes the king to have full power and have the authority to make laws and force to bind the colonies and the people of America as well as the rest of Britain’s subjects. The Declaratory Act also discusses Boston rivals and the various attacks on New York City Liberty Pole before heading back toward the Stamp Act. The town would not return the Stamp Act for which the power was transferred…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What we call judicial review today came about in the case Marbury v. Madison (1803), when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall assumed that power from the legislator. Marbury v Madison made it clear that the Supreme Court had claimed Judicial Supremacy in deciding unconstitutionality. In the book, Taking Away the Constitution From the Courts, author Mark Tushnet argues, “Doing away with judicial review would have one clear effect: It would return all constitutional decision-making to the people acting politically. It would make populist constitutional law the only constitutional law there is” (154).…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though the President is the one who appoints the members of the Supreme Court, the members of the Supreme Court that the President has chosen must be approved by the Congress. This is how the Check and Balance works with one another and keep every branches at the same level as one another. No branch has more power than one another because they each have some sort of power to keep the others in…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the early years of the nineteenth century, the United States of America was still adapting to its government. The powers of the government, just like the Union, were still developing. Because of the Constitution, the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches exist, providing their corresponding powers. However, the existence of some of these powers was caused by significant events, such as the Marbury v. Madison case – which paved way for the establishment of the Judicial Review. John Marshall – during his time as Chief Justice – helped establish the judicial branch as the final authority on the actions of the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Post-14th Amendment

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States is a country founded and built around law. A significant amount of the country’s founding fathers were lawyers. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton were all lawyers. It is no coincidence that the most important documents in the country specifically lay out the law for the protection of its people. The founders drafted an ingenious system; one of which the world had never seen.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judiciary Act of 1789, formally titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," was set apart into law by President George Washington on September 24, 1789. Article III of the Constitution set up a Supreme Court, be that as it may, left to Congress the ability to make lower government courts as required. For the most part composed by Senator Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, the Judiciary Act of 1789 set up the structure and ward of the administration court system and made the position of legal advisor general. But rectified at the time by Congress, the key format of the administration court system developed by the First Congress stays, all things considered, set up today. The act disconnected the country into zones…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the first acts of the new Congress was to establish a Federal court system through the Judiciary Act signed by President Washington on September 24, 1789. The United States Judiciary Act of 1789 was a landmark statute in the first session of the First United States Congress. It established the U.S. federal judiciary. The founders of the new nation believed that the establishment of a national judiciary was one of their most important tasks. Officially titled "An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States," was signed into law.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Supreme Court justices are more powerful than most of the kings and dictators in the present world, according to Shadow Mountain Community Church lead pastor Dr. David Jeremiah. During his Independence Day statement, the California-based pastor gave emphasis on the vacant seat left by late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the other potential vacancies in the high court. The Christian pastor said these vacancies are the reason why Americans must vote in the upcoming presidential elections, The Blaze relays. “We are a nation of laws, not a nation of dictators, but rest assured these Supreme Court justices who sit on the bench for life wield more power than most of the kings and dictators in this world,” Dr. Jeremiah said earlier this…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a country where powers are separated in order to prevent an all powerful branch of government. The three main branches of government are the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branch. These branched serve the purpose of checking and balancing each other. The Executive branch has the power to implement laws. These laws are brought on by the Legislative branch.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays