Judicial Recall Will Inevitably Lead To Harsher Sentences

Improved Essays
The issue of whether the judge should keep his position or be removed was debated after the public become aware of his sentence. It is believed that the judge shouldn’t lose his job after one unfair decision. In an article written by Paul Butler, a law professor and former prosecutor called “Judicial Recall Will Inevitably Lead to Harsher Sentences” he brings up a point that if Persky’s records reflect a pattern of unfairness, then he should be removed from the bench. However, if the judge had simply made a bad decision on the case, then a recall is unnecessary. A judge should consider about how popular their decision is to the public because “[t]his would inevitably lead to harsher punishment because, politically, it’s always safer for a judge

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judge oh no set me freeeee Have you heard of Judge Dredd? Have you heard of Judge Gesell? Unlike Judge Dredd, in bloody Batman Comics and an R rated movie, Judge Gesell was just a Judge doing what is right and making a living.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sandusky Case Study

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In many cases I like to maintain an open mind to a situation presented to me. In this case, the conspirators who contributed to Sandusky's abuses should be found guilty. Spanier, shultz and curley should all be found guilty and as mentioned before have no excuse as to why they turned a blind eye to a situation such as this one. If people who are alongside a murderer can also be found guilty of murder, then what difference does it make for these people to be charged with something less when they should receive the same charges such as Sandusky. For many years within the community the public trust was being fed nothing but lies behind their backs.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Aaron I think it's cool you picked Idaho. To be honest I here about Idaho constantly living in Montana I'm glad you gave some incite in on the sentencing guidelines for the state of Idaho. I also read the Idaho I was thinking of doing my post on Idaho as well, and I read according to U.S. Probation & pretrial District of Idaho (2014), "The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 radically changed the philosophical model for sentencing offenders in the Federal Courts" (p. 1). After this occurred congress adopted a determinate based off of national guidelines. Which lead to the supreme court in 2005 ruling in the"United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smarter Sentencing

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I am writing this letter requesting you vote in favor of the Smarter Sentencing Act. Sentences regarding possession and trafficking of controlled substances are due for much needed review. Taxpayers spend several thousand dollars to hold a single inmate in prison for a year, and there are thousands of individuals currently incarcerated for such offenses. By essentially halving the minimum sentence of these crimes the billions of taxpayer dollars saved can be applied elsewhere.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Introduction On March 12 2012, Harpers conservative government implemented omnibus bill that introduced many new mandatory minimum sentences (cbc,2012). As part of Harpers tough on crime agenda, the bill introduced mandatory minimum sentences for crimes such as drug trafficking, child exploitation and some other violent offences(cbc,2012).In accordance to their tough on crime agenda, the harper government has introduced so many new mandatory minimums sentence, to the point that we now have the second most mandatory minimum sentences in the world, second to the USA(Fine,2015). Since their introduction these mandatory minimum sentences have been debated heavily, with most people believing these mandatory minimum are unnecessary and are just increasing…

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Students at The University of Alabama weigh in on the House Judiciary Committee’s decision to send the bill that would end judicial override to the House floor on Wednesday. The committee voted 10-2 on the bill that would no longer allow judges to rule on the death penalty, shifting the responsibility to the jury instead. “It would appear that having 12 people on a jury making the decision would be more valid because there are more opinions,” said Carter Helm a freshman majoring in marketing from Chattanooga, Tn. Jameson Evans a sophomore majoring in computer science from Moscow, Idaho weighed in with his experience from his home state. “A jury always makes that decision in Idaho and it has never been a problem,” he said.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Criminal Justice System has many problems, but one of the most prominent problems deals with the issues surrounding mass incarceration. Mass incarceration in itself deals with a multitude of problems. The main problem that I am going to focus on is the incarceration of low level offenders. In the United States 1 in 5 incarcerated individuals are locked up for a drug offense (Wagner 2017).…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are thousands of nonviolent drug offenders serving a lengthy mandatory prison sentencing within federal prisons. Years ago, during the “war on drugs”, this was President Richard Nixon quick fix to the dramatic growth on drug use and dealing. Decades later, maybe sooner, it has come to light that this mandatory sentencing mostly affected African American Men. For example, powder cocaine versus crack cocaine, were said to be two different drugs and crack cocaine dealers would serve a mandatory sentencing if in possession of such. Crack cocaine was an easy drug to acquire in urban neighbourhoods while powder cocaine was seen as a much prestige drug used among a more rich community.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To leaders, workers, and interns of CALPRIG, Mass incarceration is defined as a large number of individuals being imprisoned. This definition gives no indication of a certain race, class, or religion being jailed, but we have seen incarceration in America be defined repeatedly by these very topics. Starting in the Nixon era, politicians starting advertising themselves as being, “tough on crime” to win elections and continued to cramp down on all drug related crime. Since this time, we have seen millions of people indicted on drug charges and our prison system is reaching maximum capacity. With multiple new drug laws, it has been made somewhat easy for police to arrest anyone who is involved with drugs and the majority of arrests have come on minority races and people of low class.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do people really understand what mass incarceration is? African Americans and Latino’s are the ones being thrown in prisons and jails over white people. Why is that? Who is protecting our society when individuals are being thrown in jails for committing nonviolent crimes? “African Americans are subject to legalized discrimination in employment, housing, education, public benefits, and jury service, just as their parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents once were.”…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays