Judicial Selection Process

Improved Essays
Being a judge is regarded as one of the most prestigious professions in the world. Depending on the court, whether the judgeship is state or federal, and the state, there are many different processes used for how judges take their office. Judicial selection has been a topic for discussion as people argue about which selection method is superior and why. As a proposal to Governor O’Malley, I will offer my opinion on which method should be used for the Maryland State Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, examine other methods, and ultimately provide why my solution is the ideal choice for judicial selection. As learned in class, the justices for the Maryland Court of Appeals are currently appointed by the governor and must be confirmed …show more content…
There should not be any retention elections and the justices should serve for life. I believe this method is the best choice for judicial selection because there are numerous problems with the other two methods. Upon looking at the way it currently is, with justices having periodic retention elections, I believe the elections are not only pointless, but harm the credibility of the justices along with the judicial system as a whole. While most of the justices never face any competition in retention elections, the possibility of someone else running against them completely ruins the system. If another person runs against the current justice and wins, they were not appointed by the governor nor were they confirmed by the Senate, so this already questions the credibility of the court. Another issue with retention elections is that elections in general can cause negative media surrounding the candidates. With negative ad campaigns, problems with justices that were never thought of by the general public before can be out in the open. With the general public rarely paying any attention to retention elections, one negative ad can ruin a justice’s entire credibility and whole body of work. Retention elections can cause problems that were non-existent to arise, and take up time that the justice could be using to be more focused on working than just …show more content…
Most of the public has no idea who their judges even are. Elections would take away some of the prestige of being elected by the governor, as merit is not always important for elections. Elections often times become an arms race of who can gather up the most money in support while trashing the other candidate’s campaign through ads or speeches. Most of the time during any elections, the everyday citizen is either uninformed, or under informed. They seem to pay very little attention to campaigns, and are easily swayed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. In your opinion, please discuss the “pros and cons” of the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. (Please include the advantages and/or disadvantages of partisan judicial elections and whether, in your opinion, is a better system for choosing state judges. When talking about a state judge selection, the best way to elect a judge is by the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. But there are many pros and cons to each side of this choice!…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.” Theall believes her experience as a judge and lawyer will allow her keep her personal beliefs out of cases and solely make a ruling from the facts presented. “As a judge you learn very quickly that your personal opinions don’t matter,” she said. “Your opinions are solely based off the facts and evidence in front of you.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although voters are looking for a judge that they can relate to and represent them the best, they are overlooking the educational background and credentials of those running. There is also the possibility of judges being elected primarily on their party affiliation alone and not on their platform or…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, the onerous process takes about two years, which is similar to those of many other states, and some states do not even allow restoration of suffrage upon completion of sentence or parole. Dugree-Pearson also argues that these laws are unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because they “fence out” a section of the population despite not providing a “compelling governmental interest” to do so (Dugree-Pearson 388). She specifically presents arguments against disenfranchisement laws preventing voter fraud, preventing changes that weaken criminal justice law, and the claim that felons are uniquely incapable of making rational voting decisions. She reviews literature…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist 78 Hamilton defends the Constitution’s lifetime tenure of Justices on the Supreme Court. In doing so Hamilton argues that, because of the Court’s particular role and purpose, appointing Justices for life poses no threat to republican governance. To start, Hamilton identifies the duty of the Court as, “to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void,” this is what becomes Hamilton’s definition of judicial review. Those who opposed the Constitution, Antifederalists, argued that the power of judicial review was far too great to be wielded by Justices appointed for life. In response to this Hamilton argued as to why lifetime tenure was, “an indispensable ingredient in,” the efficacy of the Judiciary.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pertaining to re-election, should judges be held to a higher standard than other candidates for any political office? Why or why not? Yes I believe that judges must be above reproach and the same for any candidate that holds a political office. As mentioned previously the American public currently believes that most judges and officials are corrupt, simple based upon hearing or reading about their unethical behaviors in the media.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States does not leave room for democratic rule. There are several instances that indicate that this statement is true, some are: the Electoral College in the selection of a President, the ratio of citizens to Senators, and the President’s judicial appointment of Supreme Court Justices. The rules set forth in the Constitution do not constitute a democracy because the weight of each vote varies. The Senate is one of the two sections in the Legislative Branch of our government.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Currently, thirty-seven states throughout the country have term limits on the governor. The majority of those thirty-seven states only allow the governor to serve two four-year terms. The term limits in these states has helped keep fresh ideas and ideologies moving through the state’s political system, and has also kept keep the elections in these states…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges are not politicians and voters should look at their values and experience. Judges interpret the law and make decisions in the pursuit of justice. It can’t be expected that a judge will be good only because he represents a party. The judicial race should not be political. The straight ticket should be therefore eliminated so that voters can select one individual candidate.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prisoner Rights In Canada

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our judges have more than enough education and experience to make these important decisions for us, and this way only the severe convictions can be accompanied by disenfranchising the convict. By not grouping all prisoner’s together and not taking away everyone’s voting rights we can hope that prisoner’s allocate their votes in an…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays