Judges Discretion Analysis

Decent Essays
There are many things according to the Kzinski article and class discussions that can limit a judges discretion. In the article, it mentions that an example of judge discretion is that judges often have to base their findings strictly off the constitution. This is very limiting because the constitution says very specific things for example, in the constitution under article 2 section 1 that says "no person except a natural- born citizen or a citizen of the US, at the time of the adoption of the constitution, shall be eligible to be president". There is essentially no way around that and since the constitution often does not change, judges are limited in their decision making process by this and often times only the constitution. The are often

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, the Constitution does not give any time constraint as to when the president can make the appointment nor has any law or amendment been made to suggest such a restriction. Unanimously striking down President Obama’s appointment on the basis of seemingly pure whim brings up the question of the court decision’s constitutionality. The courts’ decisions do not appear to follow the standard rule of law thus leaving the president powerless and the government…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Indecisiveness

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Taft had a long and extensive career path before he became president of the United States. He attended law school in his hometown of Cincinnati, Ohio after graduating high school. He easily passed certification to be a lawyer in 1880, and a few months later he was appointed as the assistant prosecutor of Hamilton County. 2 years later the president appointed him to the position of Collector of Internal Revenue in Ohio’s first district. In 1887 Taft was appointed to be a judge for Cincinnati by the Ohio governor.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Persuading Judges Summary

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Making your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner provide a framework of 115 principles dealing with persuasion, legal reasoning, brief writing, and oral arguments both budding lawyers and courtroom veterans can employ to persuade the courts to decide cases in their clients’ favor. While each of these principles was most likely laboriously scrutinized and meticulously fact-checked before making its way into the book, there are a few principles that emerge as more valuable than others. Consequently, other pieces of advice provided, while still having some merit, are simply less crucial in order to persuade judges. Many of the ideas raised in this book are essential to be successful in the courtroom, but the three…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The events that befall the Pyncheon family after Colonel Pyncheon’s initial offence, though tragic, are not a result of a curse cast by a wizard. The events that befell them directly related to their own lust for wealth and prosperity and not to their ancestors. Each and every event was the direct result of each generation’s individual decisions. For example, When Judge Pyncheon framed Clifford for the murder of his Uncle; he executed it with the same greed that motivated Colonel Pyncheon to hang Maule. Like Colonel Pyncheon, Judge Pyncheon wanted land, and ultimately wealth.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fourth Amendment History

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While it is powerful it is not absolute for it is limited by the other two branches making the checks and balances in our government take place. Judicial Review includes the ability for the court to review laws or an official act of an agent of the government. Terry v. Ohio (Know My Rights). A police officer suspected that three men were about to rob a store and confronted them.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When justices on the bench of the United States Supreme Court make their respective decisions on a case, they are faced with two outcomes. The first is that they can decide to overturn a decision from a lower court, deem a federal law unconstitutional, or nullify other federal or state statute. When the Supreme Court changes previous statute or overturns a previous court decision, it is judicial activism. But when the Supreme Court decides to uphold precedent, upholding laws passed by Congress or state legislatures, or strictly adhering to the original text of the Constitution, it is judicial restraint. Although the aforementioned terms do not have any overlap in their definitions, it can often be seen that both of these judicial practices can be implemented in a single Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our readings this week, we discussed procedural justice, due process and whether they are related, in my opinion they are. Procedural justice is the perception that decisions are implemented in fairness and transparency. Due process is when the employer advises the employee with a written notice of the reason for the termination and is presented at least 30 days prior to termination. A copy of the notice will also be sent to the Department of Labor office where the employee’s office is located. When the true process of procedural justice is implemented, people feel they have been treated with respect and dignity allowing the individual to accept outcomes they may not like (Burgess & Cast 2013).…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the judicial branch also reviews lower court decisions to also ensure they are meeting the intent of the Constitution (Kelly, 2015). Since the inception of the Constitution, there have been few instances where the system of separation of powers has been in question. The separation of powers allows each branch to work interdepended but also have overlapping powers between the other branches. These overlapping of powers allow the checks and balances to occur, so no one branch holds all the power and everything the country does is within the bounds of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lon L. Fuller’s purpose in “The Problem of The Grudge Informer” is to show his readers the various relations between the nature of law and morality. In his article, he tells his readers to hypothetically imagine that they have been elected Minister of Justice for their country. He makes his readers imagine a perfect country that then has been ruined by a political party or society that called themselves the Purple Shirts. The way they were elected was by giving false promises and by intimidation. They had no interest in abolishing the constitution, Civil and Criminal Codes, and the Code of Procedures.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays