Persuading Judges Summary

Great Essays
In Making your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner provide a framework of 115 principles dealing with persuasion, legal reasoning, brief writing, and oral arguments both budding lawyers and courtroom veterans can employ to persuade the courts to decide cases in their clients’ favor. While each of these principles was most likely laboriously scrutinized and meticulously fact-checked before making its way into the book, there are a few principles that emerge as more valuable than others. Consequently, other pieces of advice provided, while still having some merit, are simply less crucial in order to persuade judges. Many of the ideas raised in this book are essential to be successful in the courtroom, but the three …show more content…
Because first impressions are greatly influential and can entirely determine how one is viewed, making a favorable initial impression on judges is necessary in persuading them. Starting off with a weaker argument is likely to leave a bad taste in the judges’ mouthes, so to speak, and they will be less receptive to additional arguments even if they are stronger. Attention from the judges will be the highest at the beginning of oral argument, and delaying the strongest argument may cause the judges to focus on a weaker point. Additionally, many judges will ask questions while a lawyer is giving his/her argument, so the first point made will frequently be the only point discussed. Leading with the strongest argument as often as possible is vital in assuring that judges hear and understand the main point being made, leading to a more favorable case …show more content…
Justice Scalia was the valedictorian of his 1960 Harvard Law School class, served on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and was known for frequent questioning on the bench that explored “the nuances of legal text” (Oyez). Because of his time as a lawyer and his time on the Court of Appeals as well as the Supreme Court, Justice Scalia was well reversed in the art of courtroom persuasion and knew what it took for lawyers to sway judges like himself, making him an excellent source for a book like Making Your Case. Bryan Garner is the editor in chief of Black’s Law Dictionary, has published many leading books on legal style, and has been praised by The New York Times and Harvard Law Review for his knowledge of legal writing (LawProse). He has also taught many seminars and classes at law schools on the subject. While he may not have Justice Scalia’s judicial experience, he is clearly an exemplary source for the sections about legal writing, which is an important element when persuading

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, Scalia and Roberts would continue to inject questions and opinion over twenty more times each. In between the barrage of other Justice would comment all around fifteen times each. An impressive display or legal oral arguing, everyone was intellectual prepared and lucidly succinct. Justice Ruth Ginsberg was less than the best orator and Justice Kagan was often confusing with here interjections of hypotheticals. Concluding by the deciding announcement on April 29th 2013 by Justice Alito.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jay Heinrichs, the author of Thank You for Arguing, happens to be one of the best consultants for persuasive argument in the world serving clients ranging from NASA to the Wharton School of Business. In this book, he begins by demonstrating how key persuasion is…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scalia, on the other hand, is inclined to avoid using the tools of purpose and consequence because he believes they create subjectivity. Scalia also makes the argument that the meaning of the Constitution is not supposed to change generation to generation and that the open language of the Constitution is there for the legislative branch to create law, not for SCOTUS justices to make up their own laws based on the text. In the interview, Scalia argues against the Developmentalist approach. He even goes so far as to criticize it by comparing the Constitution to an empty bottle where each generation pours the liquid of its choice into it. Basically, Scalia’s argument centers around his belief that the Developmentalist approach results in judges reflecting their own morals their decision instead of remaining objective and sticking to what the text says.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MILLERSBURG — Outlining years of addiction that culminated in criminal charges for trafficking in drugs and an unrelated overdose, a Killbuck woman on Wednesday admitted to selling methamphetamine to an informant working with law enforcement. Devin Jade Williams, 22, whose last known address was 3251 Township Road 1021, pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of trafficking in cocaine. In exchange for her guilty plea, the state dismissed four other drug trafficking charges. For her part, Williams agreed to repay $295 in buy money associated with all six charges.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courtroom participants most have professional standards when serving the public. In Kenneth Olsen’s case the prosecution withheld information. In Brian Adcok case there was ineffective assistance of his counsel. In Judge Amanda F. Williams her court room was not properly ran. Because of theses misconduct, two defendants in these cases were able to appeal their court’s decision.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There I was, getting ready to argue my very first contested case, and it's before the United States Supreme Court. I'll never forget the morning of oral arguments. I got up really early and headed over to put the last touches on my argument. There was a sense of majesty, walking up those stairs, my steps echoing on the marble. I went to the lawyers' lounge — to go over my argument.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The author includes one side that favors the abolishment of peremptory challenges due to the possibility of subjecting biases. Though, the author also includes the opposing point of view, including that of a prosecuting attorney, Michael D. Barnes. Barnes believes that peremptory challenges should…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courtroom 302 provides the reader with a real time view of criminal processing. Steve Bogira begins this work from the earliest moment that a person is entered into the criminal justice system, the arrest. Bogira then takes the reader on a step by step reading tour of criminal processing, following alleged offenders as they progress through the system. Bogira introduces the reader to every character that he follows, sharing with them a background of the character, perhaps in an attempt to garner understanding of the character to the offender.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On Thursday, February 18th 2016 I attended multiple court hearings at the Marion County Courthouse in Marion, OH. In this particular court-house there are two common pleas court rooms along with two judges which include Judge Slagle and Judge Finnegan. I felt it necessary to observe both courtrooms of the courthouse to get the most out of this experience. Judge Finnegan’s courtroom was much larger than Judge Slagle’s but seemed to have been more out of date compared to Slagle’s courtroom. In judge Finnegan’s courtroom there was a witness stand directly next to the judge, a table sat vertically on both the left and right side of the room, and individual chairs lined up directly in front of the judge across the room between the two tables.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the aforementioned statements in this week’s assignment, I agree with the second statement regarding plea bargaining being right and proper. Like any tool utilized to find a solution, or to compromise, plea bargaining can be abused. A majority of the time I feel that plea bargaining is a great tool that allows for a reduction in the number of trails that judges oversee (Plea Bargaining, 2009). Moreover, I believe that our justice system is flooded and congested with pending trials and lacks the resources needed to pursue each trial with an equal amount of attention (Plea Bargain, 2009).…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The factors I believed that influenced the judge’s sentence would be for starters, the sentencing judge remarked, “ I’m not going to sentence you to centuries in prison, although the law would allow it,” (Bohm, & Haley 2014). Consequently, to me, this means the judge would not implement the full extent of punishment due to Sandusky’s contribution in the community. However, that same contribution to that same charity was where he befriended the eight young boys and molested them. Therefore, the monies received should go towards restitution for the victims and future counseling.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Court Observation Paper

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On Friday 17, 2105 I went to the Coconino Court house at 200 N San Francisco Street 10am to watch a court hear in Honorable Joshua Steinlage court room. I stayed for an hour listening to Honorable Joshua Steinlage rule on five different civil cases in dealing with sentencing. One of the main things I was struggling with was hearing what the judge had to say or what the defend was saying to the judge. Even with the one number I managed to write down, there was no court case on record in the Coononico case look up. Without the case number, I can look up what was said…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Fairness

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These instructions to the jury are not only virtuous because they illustrate the virtues of neutrality and impartiality by instructing the jury to only consider the evidence and to not be influenced when deliberating by any preconceived notions, influences, or prejudices. These instructions also envelop the common practice employed by judges of “dispassion” to prevent “emotion from exerting any influence" wherever such opportunities exist in order to maintain fairness and equality to all in the courtroom regardless of standing or background. This admonition and instruction by Judge Ito to the jury also alludes to the virtue of testimonial justice described by Miranda Fricker in Epistemic Injustice in that the jury and as well as the judge…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good Afternoon Judges, As this school year comes to a close I would like to thank you for the experience I gained from the CASA Program. My foundational year field practicum experience was remarkable. The knowledge I gained observing the professional conduct of the judges, trial counselors, for the People of the United States of America, defense counselors, the investigators, the pre-trial officers the note takers; served to invigorate my altruistic personality. In addition, it enhanced my knowledge of developmental psychology, and my ability to properly advocate for clients, takes into consideration how biological, psychological, environmental and social factors influence client actions. Mary, Raven, and Joyce provided me with solid…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays