A Rhetorical Analysis Of Hard Measures By Jose A. Rodriguez

Superior Essays
Former FBI agent Jose A. Rodriguez, Jr. served undercover as an officer of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for twenty-one years. Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 on the U.S. by Al Qaeda, Rodrigues was assigned to the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center where he was then responsible for developing and implementing methods for capturing terrorists and collecting their intelligence. In his New York Times Bestseller, Hard Measures, Rodriguez discusses the controversial interrogation techniques used by the CIA on detainees suspected to be involved with the 9/11 events and retain information on future attacks on the U.S. In this paper, I will express my views and opinions of these bizarre tactics carried out by Rodriguez and other members if the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center and relate the topic of ethics as defined by John Mill and Immanuel Kant. Government agencies were created with the intent to ensure public safety and prevent incidents …show more content…
The course of action selected brought about some positive outcome and vital information that helped them protect their country. The Obama administration chose to enforce the “take no prisoners” approach. This approach limits itself to “using blunt instruments in the war of terror.” (Rodriguez, 2012, p.252) Instead of “torture,” missiles are the used. Ultimately, the actions of the CIA displayed an image that they would do whatever it takes to protect our country from another terrorist attack. Although these agents are held to an extremely high standard, they must also learn from trial and error. Everyone and every organization must face a hiccup in order to become better. What we as American citizens and student in an Ethical Issues course, is that everything that our country does is under their own discretion. These methods would not have been made if they believed that it would but our country at greater risk of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Anne Applebaum states in “The Torture Myth”, that America has operated under the false pretense that torture is a viable option for obtaining information, and because terrorists are malicious, so America needs more aggression to win. She argues that torture hurts the country more than it benefits. Torture…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    September 11, caused most Arab descendants to be viewed as suspects to the United States. “The CIA has been hiding and interrogating some of its most important Ai Qaeda captives at a Soviet-era compound in eastern Grope, according to United States and foreign officials familiar with the arrangement” (Priest Para 1). “The hidden global internment network is a central element in the CIA unconventional war on terrorism” (Priest Para 3). These captured suspects can be held in this secret prison legally for as long as possible without being charged for any crime.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legitimacy of the criminal justice system is constantly questioned and challenged by not only victims of crime, but also those of accused of committing crimes and by the public. When should someone be read their Miranda Rights? Why do a number of people confess to their crimes while others do not? What makes an interrogation legal? How are interrogations legal?…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The NSA’s primary way of fighting terrorism, as previously noted, was through the collection and surveillance of every citizens’ communications data – known as “The Program” according to the documentary. However, not only is “The Program” unconstitutional and illegal, it has also proven to be less than helpful in contributing to the counter-terrorism efforts. While several top government officials – including President Obama, former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Cheney, former NSA Chief Michael Hayden, and others – claim that many threats have been averted thanks to “The Program,” a report found, according to Anna Mulrine, that “traditional investigative methods, such as the use of informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations, provided…for investigations in the majority of cases, while the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal…playing an identifiable role in initiating, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases” (Mulrine, Anna). She goes on, with a quote from a source saying “’it can’t justify the gathering of these millions of records when it can be done another way where the government doesn’t have to obtain all of that information’” (Mulrine, Anna).…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is now easier to justify in the context of the war on terror. Many opinions may arise when looking at whether or not we should torture potential terrorists and since there is not an actual strategy to proceed along when looking at it, the question still remains unanswered. The debate began after the incident in 9/11 had occurred and the government implemented several anti terrorism measures where justification was placed under the veil of Unitarianism. In the article “The torture debate” by Phillip Rumney and Martin O’Boyle they provide readers with complementary views on whether or not legalized systems of torture would be worth having. The authors also emphasize the issues that could result from having a torture of system since it could come with many implications.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After 9/11, security and surveillance have taken a huge turn with the advance in technology. In response to this terrorist attack, President Obama wrote a letter to the Congress of the United States, authorizing for the use of military force (AUMF) against Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). President Obama viewed these targeted killings as an act of war, but the issue is whether this act of war can be justified. Establishing whether the threat posed actual imminent threat, will determine if the war had a just cause under self-defense with the right intentions.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ENHANCED INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES According to a poll 46% of people who voted said yes EIT should be used. Everyone has heard or seen a threat and/or an act of violence. The military should be able to use Enhanced Interrogation techniques(EIT) because information not freely shared could lead to later events, the information that was gathered to prevent those events, and it could be used as a way to send a message or set an example. Information not freely shared could lead to later events.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past few years, the word “Guantanamo or Gitmo” has come to embody far more than the Cuban bay that lent its name to one of oldest military prison bases more than a century ago; it has joined our 21st century dictionary as a term emblematic of mishandling, deceived, and disregard for the rules of military and civilian law. In rare agreement, there were only two U.S. Presidents that have acknowledged the benefit of terminating operations at its detention facility, but both have tried and failed to close Gitmo. Thus far, attempts to close the facility have not only failed; they have arguably undermined their own ends by releasing belligerents back to the fight and prolonging the conflict.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most tragic terrorist attacks to take place in the United States occurred on September 11, 2001. Days after these attacks, the standing president at the time, George Bush, declared that he was on a new mission to fight back against terrorism (“The War,” 2018). Since then, various laws and regulations have been put in place to help provide a feeling of security to American Society. Moreover, to aid in the relief efforts that follow events that are considered emergencies, such as terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Consequently, of these various enactments, the following has been found to be hurtful to American society: Homeland Security, the USA Patriot Act, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The CIA gathers information from reasonable suspicion than looking for facts. From the information they gather, they try to identify connections and patterns for help them solve their cases. Few rules apply to the CIA when they gather their information. Typically, the FBI’s actions are generally public, which contrasts the CIA’s actions which are seldom heard about. Officers in the CIA are very secretive, never give away their source of information, and do not welcome outsiders.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The CIA: Mainstream Media

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, the CIA has a history of being involved in criminal activity which brings a hosts of ethical and constitutional questions into consideration with this CIA connection to control of the mainstream…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although some people say that the new agencies implemented after the 9/11 attacks have facilitate communication and integration between security measures and agencies to reshape the community to a better state, many still are not content with the aftermath. Opponents of the wiretapping and the intelligence team think that the system has been flawed all together. Many think that the money spent for the warrantless wiretapping is absurd. Robert Dreyfuss, journalist, contends that: “Even at the height of the Cold War…there was nothing like the post-911 behemoth in existence. A thousand smart intelligence analysts, a thousand smart FBI and law enforcement officers, and a few hundred Special Operations military folk are all that's needed to deal with the terrorism threat” (Intelligence Gathering).…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays