Is The Difference Between Hobbes And John Locke's Views Of Government

Improved Essays
The idea of “The Right to Govern” changed drastically over time, and it changed by people having different opinions on the matter. For example, while Thomas Hobbes’s beliefs on the rights of the people to govern were heavily based on the system of total monarchy and people handing over their rights to a ruler. On the other hand, John Locke’s beliefs were heavily based off of the system known as self-government, and the right to consent to how much the government could govern you as a citizen.
Locke’s views of human nature differ from that of Hobbes’ in the fact that while Hobbes’ views seemed to be more harsh on humans, Locke’s beliefs seemed to support and trust in humans more.
Montesquieu saw the advantage in the separation of powers by seeing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Montesquieu, believed in the division of power in government, that executive power reside in a king, legislative power in a parliament and judicial power in the courts. Montesquieu also believed…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed in the Social Contract Theory, which stated that if people choose to have government then they are entering a contract that allows legitimate authority to be in power. However, in doing so, the people will lose a few rights. The people can also revolt and overthrow that government if said government failed to protect the rights of their citizens. (p. 15) It is also important to note that Locke was mainly interested in protecting private property and did not particularly care about voter turnout, unlike Loeb or Hobbes.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    European philosophers as early as the seventeenth century begin debating how to run government. As different forms of democracy come about, wars breakout amongst European nations. Ideas on human nature and how man runs government spread throughout the world, determining for years the ways of society. The first philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, promotes the strict monarchy of commonwealth, the second, John Locke, promotes the liberal monarchy, and the last, Jean-Jacques Rousseau promotes liberal republicanism. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, born in 1588 of Malmesbury, is most known for his work in modern political philosophy.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke was one of the men during the Enlightenment period who believed that the citizens have certain rights that cannot be taken away. These rights include life, liberty, and protection of one’s property. He believed that the people should have the right to choose the government, who protects these rights. In America, the colonies were being ruled by Great Britain and were forced to abide by any laws that they had set into motion for them. Thomas Jefferson took Locke’s ideas and made his own rights, that include, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, for the people stated in The Declaration of Independance.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leah Schulz Professor Jennifer Hanson History 2- 81010 September 07, 2017 Hobbes vs. Locke Both, Hobbes and Locke, were known as social contract theorists as well as natural law theorists. Hobbes is well known for writing Leviathan and Locke is well known for writing Treatises on Government. However, they are different in regards to their stand and conclusions in several laws of nature. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher from Malmesbury. He first started rising to fame when his book Leviathan, laid the foundation of Western political philosophy.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cyrus The Great Dbq

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Locke played off of Hobbes idea that the sovereign must justify its exercise of power. In contrast however, Locke went much further into identifying human rights. Locke writes that: The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker. (Locke 107) Locke believed that in a state of nature all men are inherently equal.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles de Montesquieu was the first to demonstrate the separation of powers in his work L’Esprit des Lois (the Spirit of the Laws) in 1748, he introduced the theory of the separation of powers as a baseline principle (Bondy, 1896). Legal power is separated between those who make laws, those who apply the laws and those who adjudicate on matters of compliance of law. The Judiciary also ensures that the laws are consistent with the powers given to the legislature or executive in accordance with the Constitution. This principle ensures that we are ruled by laws and not the exercise of unchecked executive power. The phrase “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” has become a truism as the concentration of powers in one branch is prone to errors (Civilization of the Political System,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated by Locke, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and this is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 365). Consequently, Locke believed that citizen should organize to protect their natural rights, to ensure that these right are not being abused by people of power or the government. As a result, Locke developed a social contract that states that the government and its people had mutual responsibilities in protecting these rights. On the other hand, Locke believed that “living in a state may entail consent to a social contract, but if the state abuses the power entrusted to it by its citizens, they retain the right to rebel” (Roots of Wisdom Pg.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His similarities to Locke have much to do with the social contract theory, which he was also believed in. Despite this, the two theories differ fundamentally on why government has its place in society and how influential government can be. (p.15). Hobbes put a great emphasis on government, probably in part due to the era in which he lived. Hobbes did not quite live long enough to see the Enlightenment and the new ideals that shortly followed.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    France During the 18th century, new political ideas greatly influenced the French revolution, which was the turning point in French history. Indeed, one of the most important and influential philosophers ever named John Locke (1632-1704) had a profound impact on French thinkers and the revolution. French philosophers of the Enlightenment took Locke as a model. He was the promoter of a political philosophy based on the concept of natural law where all men collectively elect a government to protect their natural rights.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, he brings up compelling argument that those who are most virtuous should rule (100-103). While in the “Second Treatise of Government” Locke explains the nature of humanity, state of nature, and the civil government. Locke’s belief is that all humans are born into…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A philosopher by the name of Montesquieu, “argued for a separation of powers, with political power divided among different classes and legal estates holding unequal rights and privileges” (McKay, 563). His idea on the separation of powers influenced the constitution of France in…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One argument that has prevailed throughout time and knowledge is the conflict between nature and nurture. This argument proposes that humans are either products of their genes and inherited traits, or of their environment and social relationships. Although many recognize that both nature and nurture play a role in humankind, this conflict still poses an issue till this day (Moore, 2001). This problem was brought to light during the eighteenth-century, also known as the Age of Enlightenment or Age of Reason. As this period promoted an increase of a well-educated society that emphasized reason, people began to investigate human behavior.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays