Comparing Barbour And Wright's Keeping The Republic

Improved Essays
Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17) Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind. People would essentially vote for or against certain issues in order to benefit or prevent being hindered by them. (p.17). As mentioned in a class discussion, Madison was a Federalist, so he believed in a stronger national government, which may have also been due to …show more content…
Locke believed in the Social Contract Theory, which stated that if people choose to have government then they are entering a contract that allows legitimate authority to be in power. However, in doing so, the people will lose a few rights. The people can also revolt and overthrow that government if said government failed to protect the rights of their citizens. (p. 15) It is also important to note that Locke was mainly interested in protecting private property and did not particularly care about voter turnout, unlike Loeb or Hobbes. (p.15 and class discussion) Having lived very closely to the Enlightenment, we see some of the ideals of the time, namely logic and reason, indented onto Locke’s theory. Locke believed that reason was the basis of government, which was the previous ideals of Divine Right, the thought that god chose individuals in power. This was a classic example of enlightenment ideology, which was mostly based off of logical explanations rather than religious. (p. 15). While it does not appear that Locke himself was affiliated with a political party, his theory appears to have later supported the Whig Party after his death. (Moseley,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Federalist Papers were papers written in 1787 by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. There were eighty-five papers in total. However we will just be covering numbers ten, fifty-one, forty-seven, and thirty-nine. These cover many of the major problems that would be facing a new government. These papers were very important to our constitution, and our founding.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison wanted to due away with the idea of a Pure Democracy because of the accepted idea that democracies inevitably dissolved because of factions. Factions commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others. A common faction many officials worried about when creating a new governing document was the “various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.” , as stated in the PowerPoint “Understanding Federalist…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson Vs Hamilton

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their opponents - "Democrats, Republicans" from the camp of Jefferson, Madison and George Clinton, on the other hand, insisted on limiting the powers of central government and strengthening the position of local institutions. From their point of view, the less the federal government will intervene in the life of the country, the better. As it turned…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers were written in attempt to get citizens to ratify the United States Constitution in 1787, and more specifically the citizens of New York. Eighty-five essays made up the Federalist papers. When citizens were reviewing the United States Constitution the Federalists papers basically guided them through it and helped people to understand how the Constitution should be interpreted as well as where the ideas came from. In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which brings me to my next topic: Separation among the government. James Madison was one to think that the Articles of Confederation wasn’t good enough, that there needed to be something new and better create. The Constitution gives the three branches of government the chance to have powers the other one may not have. The point of separation is that the government isn’t just a big group of people that meets every month and discusses their issues and creates new ideas, They made three groups because if there was just a big, gigantic group of people, everyone would try to take control by himself and rule over everybody else. In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison had written “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly the very definition of tyranny.”…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke was a vocal supporter of the freedoms of equality and the protection of democratic government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke stated that “there [is] nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank…should also be equal” (Document A). This idea of equality among citizens was important in promoting acceptance and fairness in English society after the adoption of a constitutional monarchy. In addition, Locke believed that, “When the government is dissolved, the people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative[ure]” (Document A). This revolutionary idea of overthrowing a failing government greatly influenced the American colonists in their revolt against Great Britain, and is evidenced in the Declaration of Independence.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Madison also is keen to promote the unity of the United States of America. The Federalist publications, after all, were the means to an end of gaining support for the ratification of the constitution which proposed a centralized, or Federal, government. Madison exemplifies the glory of a republic, on the size of the United States, when he goes to say, “Hence, it clearly appears that the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic.” (Great Documents 41). After this new republic has been practiced for eight years under Washington, one could say that it appeared to be justly unifying.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer Escue Coach Quinn European History November 24, 2015 The Ideas of John Locke A philosopher is someone who is engaged or learned in philosophy. So who were some of the greatest philosophers?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison took these concerns, and addressed them in Federalist 10. He argued that a large republic wouldn’t limit liberty or promote tyranny, and that the people would be fully represented. Madison’s first argument was that it was nearly impossible for the government to become a superpower. The Constitution had built in “fail-safes” for the government, and it was difficult to gain enough power to be despotic. One of those fail-safes was the principle of limited government.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison took many notes and recorded most of the information from the Constitutional Convention. He wanted a strong central government, making him a federalist. He was known for having concepts on forming a three-part federal government, including the legislative, executive, and the judicial branch with his Virginia Plan. James Madison wanted to have a check and balance system because he didn’t want abuse of power in any one group in the government. James Madison is also well known as the “Father of our Constitution” due to his contributions towards drafting it as well as getting it ratified.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist Paper

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The framers of the constitution believed that those voting would not vote with the basis of everyone having the right skills for that job. With the government depending on the people for power, it is up to the people then to ensure that powers are not taken for granted and that we institute safeguards, such as checks and balances to protect us. Madison even dictates towards us that if we were indeed angels, then we would not require a government. Madison concludes this essay with stating that certain countries are too large for self-government to flourish, however his proposed plan of justice to be the purpose of government and society.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. What did he suggest to eliminate the cause of factions? Madison believed there were only two plausible ways to eliminate the cause of factions; however, the first one he believed was impossible. Either you destroy the concept of liberty, freedom, and basically everything they fought for in the American Revolution or you alter the opinions of every citizen so that the beliefs are uniform across the board. Because both are either impossible and/or…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that if a government acts out of line and in their own self-interest, the people who are under its control should rebel against them and then construct a new government. He thought that man was able to govern themselves since they naturally were unselfish. Thomas Hobbes was another English philosopher who had pessimistic views that were a little different than Locke’s.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays