The Role Of The Separation Of Powers In The Australian Constitution

Great Essays
This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described
In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian
…show more content…
Charles de Montesquieu was the first to demonstrate the separation of powers in his work L’Esprit des Lois (the Spirit of the Laws) in 1748, he introduced the theory of the separation of powers as a baseline principle (Bondy, 1896). Legal power is separated between those who make laws, those who apply the laws and those who adjudicate on matters of compliance of law. The Judiciary also ensures that the laws are consistent with the powers given to the legislature or executive in accordance with the Constitution. This principle ensures that we are ruled by laws and not the exercise of unchecked executive power. The phrase “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” has become a truism as the concentration of powers in one branch is prone to errors (Civilization of the Political System, …show more content…
Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014).
Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014). Another form of checks and balances has been the implementation of constrained parliamentarism. Another form of checks and balances has been established with Parliament seeing the need for different institutions such as the Auditor General’s office, Freedom of Information, Integrity commissions and the Ombudsman to reformed upper houses (Fenna,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Australian Federal government and all State governments, except for Queensland, consists of two chambers; the upper and…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The executive, legislative, and the judiciary are the three branches of our government. Keeping them separate is necessary. Otherwise, you would have a dictatorship. Also this paper was written to protect the rights of the people, and of the country.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Framers Research Paper

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation of powers was exceptionally important to the framers when creating our government. They were immensely worried about one branch becoming too strong and needed a solution to ensure that it would not happen. The Framers created the three branches of government and put checks and balances on each one. Each branch has a number of checks on the others. An example of this is the executive branch has the power to veto a bill from the legislative branch, but the legislative branch can override the veto by a three fifths majority vote…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this system created by the Constitution, one department’s ambition and need for power hinders the other department’s liberty. In order to possess power, the departments must find an equal balance. This equal balance is “necessary to control the abuses of government. ”(51) Although equal separation of power is ideal, “the legislative authority necessarily predominates.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental truth of separation of powers and checks and balances is that they prevent the government from gaining too much power which could potentially lead to a tyranny. Checks and balances help keep separation of powers by giving each branch specific powers that can check the other branch's actions. These checks and balances allow the branches to have limited power while maintaining the clear separation of powers into three branches and have ultimately created a limited/balanced form of government. Balance is described as an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady. The system of separation of powers distributes the government's power into three even branches while checks and balances allows these branches to stay even in power and prevent the branches from gaining too much power, overall enabling the government to stay upright and perform its duties to the people properly.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Separation of Power To ensure no person in the government has too much power. The government is separated into three branches, the congress, executive, and judicial branch. Each branch has different power, duties, responsibilities, and limitation.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (1900) set of fundamental laws that dictate how powers are granted, ordered and exercised within the Australian Commonwealth. As Australia’s social and political climate changes with time, the constitution is changed due to it’s out-dated, irrelevant or lack of clauses. This can happen in several ways with two distinct outcomes – its form can be altered (the actual text and clauses of the written act change) or its operation can be reinterpreted. The Constitution was originally drafted to clearly outline the states’ and the Commonwealth’s divergent powers in a binding document. However, 115 years passed and the constitution created with the intention of granting states a semblance of autonomy,…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In many countries such as Canada and the United States, the hegemony has been divided between the executive branch, the judiciary courts and the legislative branch. “Generally, the amount of power for each member of these institutions is to be uniformly divided; conversely, the fairly recent transformation has increasingly concentrated the majority of power towards the hearts of the government” ("Is the Canadian Prime Minister too Powerful?,"2010). In recent years, many political scientist have argued that the demographic changes in political systems have led the executive branches in western governments to have extensive amounts of power. In this essay, I will argue that the executive branches of western governments; particularly that of Canada’s…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the result of the 2010 Australian federal election, the issue of whether or not the health of Australia’s liberal democracy necessitating a two party system is debated academically. In this essay it is argued that a two party system is not essential thus the opposing proposition not confirmed by the result of the election. Relevant and contemporary arguments are presented in support of the premise that a hung parliament is of benefit to the health of Australia’s liberal democracy. First, academic definitions of Australia’s liberal democracy and tow party system are discussed. Second, research shows a two party system as an elitist system supported by neo liberalists and an affront to liberal democratic principles.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks And Balance System

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A good example of balances are good for the country for instance if a legislative branch introduces a lot that they would like past to go will go to the executive branch president decides to not sign the bill he therefore vetoes the law but the legislative branch has another chance and within the foots the branch can override the executive branch is veto the bill becomes a law and once that laws in place the type of the country May use it in the court system. I see may be able to see and of the countries when the branch of government is a lot to take over then send you have a dictatorship if you will with that branch of government in the United States we make sure that no government can override each other and cause…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Post-14th Amendment

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States is a country founded and built around law. A significant amount of the country’s founding fathers were lawyers. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton were all lawyers. It is no coincidence that the most important documents in the country specifically lay out the law for the protection of its people. The founders drafted an ingenious system; one of which the world had never seen.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of powers is designed to make the branches balanced and prevent too much power being in the hands of one person. Separation of powers weaken the power of the executive branch by spreading power to the other branches. It took away the core powers that the executive branch needs to make effective decisions. As Hamilton stated ()But the multiplication of the Executive adds to the difficulty of detection in either case. It often becomes impossible, amidst mutual accusations, to determine on whom the blame or the punishment of a pernicious measure, or series of pernicious measures, ought really to fall.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays