Comparing Barbour And Wright's Keeping The Republic

Improved Essays
Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17). Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind. People would essentially vote for or against certain issues in order to benefit or prevent being hindered by them. (p.17). As mentioned in a class discussion, Madison was a Federalist, so he believed in a stronger national government, which may have also been due to his distrust of “the people”. Madison’s ideologies also appear to have been influenced by his era. Madison worked through what was known as the American Enlightenment. This was a period where new political advances were being made and new ideals were created. As a newly founded country, there was essentially a blank slate to work with. This allowed Madison to feel free to develop his ideas …show more content…
His similarities to Locke have much to do with the social contract theory, which he was also believed in. Despite this, the two theories differ fundamentally on why government has its place in society and how influential government can be. (p.15). Hobbes put a great emphasis on government, probably in part due to the era in which he lived. Hobbes did not quite live long enough to see the Enlightenment and the new ideals that shortly followed. During this time period, the church was a major authority and, as such, life was sometimes seen as being impossible without some force controlling it, whether or not it was as large and powerful as the church

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Federalist Papers were papers written in 1787 by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. There were eighty-five papers in total. However we will just be covering numbers ten, fifty-one, forty-seven, and thirty-nine. These cover many of the major problems that would be facing a new government. These papers were very important to our constitution, and our founding.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers were written in attempt to get citizens to ratify the United States Constitution in 1787, and more specifically the citizens of New York. Eighty-five essays made up the Federalist papers. When citizens were reviewing the United States Constitution the Federalists papers basically guided them through it and helped people to understand how the Constitution should be interpreted as well as where the ideas came from. In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first major claim he makes is that the three governmental branches will seek to be independent from each other in an attempt to keep their governmental powers from being encroached upon. This is particularly explicit from Madison in Federalist 51, “But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.” Again, the idea of separate branches comes as a central point in the containment of federal powers. Additionally, Madison also recognizes that the legislature will always be the more powerful branch and is once again stopped from becoming too powerful by use of the bicameral system (Federalist…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the constitution of the United Stats of America was written in 1787 it has long since been a topic of conversation as well as confrontation among politicians and political theorists alike. The ideals of James Madison and John Dewey regarding constitutional reform and democracy are just another example of this. These two men, both extremely influential in their own way, have conflicting views of liberty, democracy and largely the revision of the constitution and its consequences or lack there of. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution, believed that constitutional revision should be infrequent. While John Dewey argues for change, while not specifically on constitutional revision but rather for “effective liberty” for the state of democracy as a whole, which ultimately relates to that of constitutional revision.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will examine the theory that there are differences between Hamilton and Madison in The Federalist. The mild differences between them are largely thought to be considered a split personality. However, one may determine that there are no differences between Hamilton and Madison writing as “Publius”. As to be evidenced, this analysis will show that they actually had very similar views on the new ideas of government. The differences between Madison and Hamilton were actually related to the issues and struggles they faced while introducing such a complex system and principles of republicanism rather than theoretical differences between its…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drew Hysjulien James Madison Paper 3 Despite endorsing radically different visions for the institutional set up of government, both the federalist and anti-federalists had very similar end goals to their governmental system. Revolutionary leaders from both sides agreed that it was essential for government to protect the rights and liberties of their citizens, promote the common good, and that governments were to be republican and endorsed by popular sovereignty. The Anti-Federalist feared a consolidation of the states, whereas the Federalists feared the anarchy of sovereign states. In regards to popular rule the Anti-Federalists believed this would be best obtained from state governments, as they were closest to the people and best reflected…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist Point of View The United States of America decided to break away from The British Empire. The first constitution of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, which imposed strict limitations on the authority of the federal government. Most of the power rested in the hands of state governments. The government of the United States under the Articles of Confederation was weak, could not enforce laws, raise an army, regulate commerce, or levy a tax.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two years later he was elected in to the Continental Congress where he was recognized for his power. James Madison knew the Articles of Confederation were flawed and feared the government would not be able to win the war. He believed a stronger government could protect the United States. As he attended conventions, he took the lead for the Federalist on arguing why a constitution should be…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founders of the Declaration of Independence sought to create a government that would be formed from the ideas and concepts that they had encountered through their various readings and studies. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are by far the most influential thinkers of the Constitution and continue to affect American thought even today. Many of John Locke’s ideas directly correlate with those included in the Declaration of Independence yet they are reworded to suit the needs of the new government.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An idea that is very important is that no branch of government can be completely independent. As Madison said, if that were to happen, then the people would have to vote for every office position. The normal American cannot make those informed choices because they don’t understand all of the experience needed for certain government jobs. Also, while the government must govern the people, they must govern themselves as well.2 That statement is one of the biggest problems we are facing in today’s society. Corrupted elected officials are all we see on the news today.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, he did not agree with the fact that majority would settle wise decision for the public. During that era, minority group was more educated and had more properties, so Madison had a point on his argument. Therefore, he suggested to have Republican…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke and Hobbes are political philosophers, very important in the development of politics and a great influence for modern thought. The two make reference in their texts to the thought in which man exists without government "state of nature", and the risk of it. On the one hand, Locke talks about the benefits that are to come. He believes that men are by nature social animals. And when referring to the state of nature, he points out already existing examples.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays