Reverse Of Happiness Analysis

Improved Essays
“Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Mill 11.)” In happiness versus unhappiness, people are going to do what they can to strive to be happy. Individuals will do their best to maximize happiness even if it means breaking the rules. When it comes to rape and abortion, what is the morally right thing for the woman to do? A woman has a right to her body but a fetus also has a right to live. For that reason, the issue of utilitarianism is biased; therefore I will argue that Mills is incorrect since his concept claims that actions are true in the amount since they tend to encourage overall human desire, for instance, abortion is morally wrong even in the case of …show more content…
“So act, that thy rule of conduct might be adopted as a law by all rational beings (Mills 15.)” In this day and age individuals strive for happiness in their society. Most spend their liveliness seeking it and evading pain, the hope here is to feel content. "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure." (Mill 16). How does one determine pleasure and pain when it comes to abortion? For starters they would have to determine what their moral standards are. Dejectedly, abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Is abortion morally right or wrong? Well that would depend on who you ask. For those that feel abortion is morally right would argue that a woman has a right to decide what happens to her body. Yet, those that feel abortion is morally wrong would argue that life starts at conception therefore killing a fetus is murder. Sometimes in life, a person has to determine that there’s more to life than pleasure. Sometimes we have to do what is morally right even if …show more content…
Just because it makes people happy doesn’t mean it is right. There are unusual situations that rules don’t cover. For example, the conflict between rape and abortion. What is the right thing to do morally? Is abortion justifiable in rape cases? Both parties should be considered victims. A woman who is raped is a victim of a horrendous and violent crime and carrying a fetus to term is going to be a constant reminder of the violent crime committed against her. However, is this a relevant case for abortion considering conception does not occur immediately following intercourse? If the woman gets immediate medical attention then pregnancy will not occur. Likewise, some will argue that babies born to rape can be put up for adoption if the mother doesn’t want to keep

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is happiness? Do we have a right to have it? In the essay “We have no Right to Happiness” C. S Lewis claims that we do not have a right to happiness and sets his foundation on an anecdote. Throughout our life we meet so many different people; some are happy while some are not, but it is not up to us to decide whether they are happy or not, and what makes one person happy would make another person happy, or whether it is the right path to happiness. In the article mentioned above, Lewis describes a story about a husband who divorced his wife to be with other women which consequently drove the wife to committing suicide.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion, also referred to the withdrawal of the fetus and or embryo from the womb of a woman, for the sake of ending the pregnancy. Inside of one of the most controversial topics to date lie two sides, those Pro-Life, and those Pro-Choice. Many believe that abortion is an unforgivable act, one in which is the “…direct killing of the innocent child, ‘Murder’, by the mother herself…” (Mother Theresa), while others believe that abortion is that of a complete choice given to the mother who is carrying the child. Abortion has been an issue all around the world since the 18th century, however, not until the late 1800’s did much controversy began to appear when many states banned the act.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Abortion

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    According to strong pro-choice advocates, until someone knows for sure when human life begins, it is not possible to know that abortion is the killing of a person, so for now, it is morally right if a woman wants to get an…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We Cannot Chose To Be Happy Imagine you are a old man, nearly 90. Your family has neglected to care for you. You are alone, begging on a street corner.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equation Of Happiness

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Concept of Happiness Happiness is finding satisfaction in everyday life. There are many factors that, added together, equal happiness. That particular equation is unique to each individual. Many times happiness is sought in material things. Happiness can not be bought, it is free.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent discussions of women having abortion, a controversial issues has been whether it should be against the law or not for women to have an abortion. On one hand, some argue that it should be against the law for women to have an abortion because some a portion of the population thinks it should illegal since the mother is ending her pregnancy by killing the baby. They believe it is considered murder since the mother is practically killing the fetus. On the other hand, however, others argue that women should be allowed to have an abortion if they want to because if the individual believes that she is not able to support the baby or does not want to have it due to personal issues, then the mother should be able to abort the pregnancy.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using Immanuel Kant 's moral philosophy, we can make an arguable debate. According to Kant 's moral principle, Kant uses categorical imperative: a rule stating what ought to be done based upon pure reason alone and not contingent upon sensible desires. Therefore, moral rules for Kant, have no exceptions. Killing is always wrong. Everyone has good will.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the conscious decision to choose to end a pregnancy. Although gruesome, an abortion is, in simple, nonmedical terms when a child inside the womb is torn apart and taken out of the mother’s body. In some events, when it’s been more than twenty-four weeks of pregnancy, the doctor is forced to pull the fetus out of the mother and stab in in the neck with a sharp item. The brain is then sucked out of the neck with a vacuum like medical tool. Due to the amount of research and knowledge we have on the human body, nowadays there is also an option to abort a child by ingesting pills.…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    CRITIQUE 1: “Does Money Buy Happiness?” (331) The essay “Does Money Buy Happiness?” by Don Peck and Ross Douthat which was originally published as the January/February 2003 issue of the Atlantic discusses how wealthier countries tend to be happier than non wealthy countries, but there are exceptions. In paragraph 2, Peck and Douthat wrote the claim as “[M]oney does buy happiness-but only to a point” and justifies by using Robert E. Lane’s argument and charts to support their claim (use of logos).…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental problem with the greatest happiness for the greatest number, is that it eradicates genuine people and turns them simply into numbers. This is shown explicitly in Bentham’s hedonic calculus, which turns ethics into a calculation. The issue with this is that it can deem blatantly immoral acts as “the right thing to do”. Following this philosophy, we can easily justify, injustices and the violation of rights such as gang rape, murder or the general suffering of others in order to provide the masses with pleasure. However, this is assuming Bentham’s hedonistic views, that happiness is pleasure, an idea that has since been disputed by philosophers such as Mill.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics