John Stuart Mill Vs Qualitative Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it …show more content…
Mill bases his theory in human psychology, saying that desire is universal regardless of one’s religious convictions. He also recognizes that human pleasures differ in quality, not just quantity (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Mill believed that human higher desires are those of reason and intellect while the lower desires are based on our immediate and biological needs and wants. Mill found that it is impossible to quantify lower desires because they are innate and natural. Some strengths of qualitative utilitarianism are that it does take into account natural human desires and gives them weight in order to help make an ethical decision (Wilkens, 2011). Utilitarianism’s goal is to promote goodness and happiness and focuses on how no individual’s happiness is more valuable than that of any other. Unfortunately, not everyone has the same definition of goodness. This is the key flaw in utilitarianism because like in the example of man trapped in the electrical hub, it can be skewed by number of people it may affect. Another flaw in utilitarianism is that it does not take into account justice or laws of any kind. If the government attempted to use utilitarianism to justify it’s laws, even if they are trivial like jaywalking, there can be an extensive argument on both sides of the issue and no decision could ever be made. If utilitarianism is placed only upon individuals when making relatively small or personal decisions it can be very useful. A perfect example for this would be the “trolley allegory” where a trolley driver has to make the decision whether to accidentally kill five or only one maintenance man. His breaks are not working and the maintenance workers are completely oblivious to the oncoming danger, he has to make a choice weather to keep going straight killing five workers or make a turn where there is only one worker in the way of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism as defined by Mill is not clear and cogent. I disagree with his argument because I think it is too broad and too exaggerated. I do not believe that if something creates mass amounts of happiness that it should be done. It is not genuine ethics because it lacks metaphysics. There are many gaps in the principle that are not valid to his argument.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through spring-boarding off opponent’s arguments, Mill defines the utilitarian vocabulary and fortifies his theory of morality. Mill begins by first defining “utility” in a way that holds the word neutral from belief that it is opposed to or based solely on pleasure. He defines utility as “not something to be contradistinguished from pleasure, but pleasure itself, together with…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is so the future is understood better (Cave, 2011, p.62). Also, Utilitarianism has an unprejudiced concern for the overall welfare of people Utilitarianism allows minimal pain on humans and animals as much as possible which is seen to be a good thing as there will be minimal suffering (Cave, 2011 p.62). Additionally, Utilitarianism focuses on human flourishing which can be argues as an Aristotelian direction to be able to understand this. Likewise with Deontology, Utilitarianism has fixed principles that is unlikely to change, for instance, not killing. This allows individuals to rely on the moral theory and to perform their own rights democratically to go with the majority to become fair (Cave, 2011 p.64).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holden Gilbertson Philosophy 101 Dr. Fletcher RAP Assignment Kant Vs. Mill Mill believe that the consequences of actions determine its moral worth. While Both Philosophers have a good argument on the process of making decisions. Mill believes in utilitarianism and thinks that actions are based off of happiness.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When time is of the essence, utilitarianism can be a guide when we need to make a moral decision. It allows us to think with her heart and emotions, and not just our brains. This is what makes us different from animals and has enabled us to evolve into the people we are today. Utilitarianism allows people to live a happier life because they can make the choices that are best for them, their friends, and…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we routinely differentiate between hedonism as a theory of the good and utilitarianism as a consequentialist theory of the right. Mill, however, considered both doctrines to be so closely intertwined that he used the term ‘utilitarianism’ to signify both theories. On the one hand, he says that the “utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end.” (CW 10, 234) On the other hand, he defines utilitarianism as a moral theory according to which “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness…”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In class, we have been discussing ethical theories as well as practicing placing these theories to cases. Ethical theories are a set of principles of right conduct and a system of moral values. The field of ethics involves systematizing, defending, and deciding different concepts of right and wrong behavior. In this day, philosophers are known to separate ethical theories into either metaethics, normative ethics, or applied ethics. I’ve chosen to focus on John Stuart Mill and Aristotle’s opposing argumentative theories which help teach me to analyze the cases provided to me.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays