Into The Wild Argumentative Essay

873 Words 4 Pages
Into the Wild Argumentative Essay Christopher McCandless stated “The very basic core of a man’s living spirit is his passion for adventure, the joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences.” Chris McCandless had been a very spontaneous person in his time of living. McCandless always did things the way he wanted to do them. He was an independent person who did courageous things. McCandless never let people get him down, because he knew the things he did were gonna be fascinating to tell one day. Therefore, let's see Chris McCandless’s story and why it's so worth telling the world. To start with, John Krakauer was such an intelligent person to tell the world about Chris McCandless’s story. Krakauer showed that McCandless had been an “Individuality and Non-Conformist” person when Carwile said “But I get the feeling he was the kind of …show more content…
He had been a “Spirit of Rebellion” type of person. McCandless had never really cared of what other people had thought of him. Even if he was doing something wrong he didn't mind it, because he knew he could change it around. For example, when McCandless dropped all of the hard work he did in school, left where he was living, and decided to live out Into the Wild was a huge risk. But, sometimes taking huge risks like that make a huge difference and will be worth it in the long run. Another ideal that Krakauer had claimed that McCandless had was “Living a Simple Life”. McCandless followed by this ideal through most of his time adventuring. He wanted to live in simple conditions without having to worry about anything. McCandless believed living in the wildness was simple enough for him to enjoy life more than it was started. For example, when McCandless child good had even bad he wanted to be able to live it as simple as possible in the future. And adventuring in nature had been the answer to McCandless, which brings us to our next

Related Documents