While yet I have no concise way of knowing which depiction is actually true it does provide some form of explanation for why god appears to be a dynamic character. However this small form of closure on that issue prompts another potentially even more important question for me. If a portrayal of god is wrong must that not mean that whoever took part in the writing of that book of the bible did not know everything he was writing about? This issue could potentially lead to not only the depiction of god being wrong but also whatever it was the writer was uncertain about. So if this is the case as I believe it is then how am i supposed to understand the bible as the “word of god” as I have heard it said before? If the text of the bible could potentially be littered with writings of uncertainty then I am left with the issue of not knowing what is true and what is not and that poses a very big problem for how I am supposed to understand and practice my
While yet I have no concise way of knowing which depiction is actually true it does provide some form of explanation for why god appears to be a dynamic character. However this small form of closure on that issue prompts another potentially even more important question for me. If a portrayal of god is wrong must that not mean that whoever took part in the writing of that book of the bible did not know everything he was writing about? This issue could potentially lead to not only the depiction of god being wrong but also whatever it was the writer was uncertain about. So if this is the case as I believe it is then how am i supposed to understand the bible as the “word of god” as I have heard it said before? If the text of the bible could potentially be littered with writings of uncertainty then I am left with the issue of not knowing what is true and what is not and that poses a very big problem for how I am supposed to understand and practice my