Compare And Contrast The Three Branches Of Government

Improved Essays
The writers of the Constitution separated the major functions of government by creating the three branches of federal government. The three branches of government are the Legislative, the Judicial and the Executive. The Legislative branch is the branch in charge of making laws. The Judicial branch is the branch that explains the laws of the U.S under the Constitution and lastly the Executive branch, the President is the head of the government making laws official. Checks and Balances is a system used by the U.S government to limit the power of each branch so that every branch is equal in power and no branch has too much power. This Checks and Balances system is important to our government because if not, one branch would take over the others and there would be no control or equality with the power our government has and is given by the people. The colonists past experiences with British rule led to the fear of creating a strong central government. Because of this fear the Articles of Confederation seemed like an amazing constitution for the U.S. It established a weak national (federal) government and strong state governments. State governments had the power to coin money and control …show more content…
Then this way, not one branch or the other becomes too powerful. Checks and balances sound exactly as it works each branch checks the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them. Checks and Balances is a very important system in our government, the writers of the Constitution thought it would be best to divide power of our government into three branches this also began separation of powers. Separation of powers is each of the branches having its own jobs or duties and without the system our government would be over powered by a single branch and that wouldn’t be right to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This branch does not work to cooperate with the other branches to take over the United States and gain complete control of everyone inside the country. The anti federalists see the federal government as one that agree with each other and that will simply pass any law that they wish in order to make them richer and stronger, but in reality only truly necessary laws would be allowed to pass. They forget what happened back in the late 1700s when states and their governments power were greatly uneven. The states that could offer more economically would inevitably have more power leaving other states weak. The federal government helped fix this problem by creating a Union that helped every state.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fight Against Tyranny

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With checks and balances, each of the three branches has the right to limit the powers of the other two branches. By doing this, one branch does not have the opportunity to overpower the others. Basically, each branch “checks” or oversees the power of the other two branches to make sure that the power is balances among all three of them equally. Checks and balances limit government power in the U.S. because it allows all three branches to watch out over one another so one won’t become too powerful over the other two. By doing this, they equally balance the power between them.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Extended Republic

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Feasibility of an Extended Republic in America Governments are only as effective as their structure allows them to be. A government that is large and unwieldy will rarely be efficient due to the red tape and bureaucracy bogging it down. The power structure in a monarchy differs from the structure in a republic. When deciding the shape of the American government, the Founding Fathers carefully considered all shapes and sizes of government to try and find what would suit the new nation the best in the wake of the Articles of Confederation. Their decision to establish an extended republic was a revolutionary idea that attracted much criticism and attention because it was an untested idea.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of power also creates a checks and balances system which prevents one of the branches of government from having more power over another. Ultimately resulting in a equal or limited government. Without these systems limiting the government's powers and keeping it balanced the government would be controlled by a single group of people (tyranny). Our government today is a clear democracy run by our three branches united so I’d say our systems have ultimately create a balanced or limited form of government in the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This government provides an ideal balance between personal rights and federal power. Terrorists and white supremacy groups such as the KKK reject the values of equality and cause conflicts while attempting to revoke the rights of many Americans. But this dissent is ultimately defeated in the face of a solidified political structure.. Government has an obligation to enforce the rights of all people, meaning that dissenters now have less influence on democracy. Dissent can still cause discord, but because today’s federal government has much more power and stability than its early American counterpart, dissenters are now unable to seriously threaten American…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair, cruel ruling and no freedom, how would you like to have a government that follows these set of rules? This is what it would be like to have tyranny in the United States government. This is what it would be like without the creation of the constitution.The first guard against tyranny was federalism, which is federal, state and local government. Another protection against tyranny was separation of powers which made three main branches of government, judicial ,executive and legislative. One of the last guards against it is checks and balances which makes sure the different branches are using their power correctly and if they’re not then the others can check them for it.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution’s guard against tyranny was very powerful. The guard was set to protect the states and individuals from the government having absolute power. If the Constitution was not intact, the government would absolutely use their powers to their benefit because they would be untouchable. The Constitution has many ways of abolishing tyranny and making it hard for the people in power to take advantage of it. The Constitution does help against government having absolute power, mainly because issues laws that contain rights for its citizens.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Constitution Flaws

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The separation of powers is likely the most vital to our country, in that we have no one person or elite group in power, that power is divided in a way that keeps it in control. This goes hand-in-hand with the three branches and checks and balances. Separated and sharing power, they keep the other in check and create balance in the government. This was key regarding the compromise the founders made, strengthening the government from what it was but still keeping it in control. This goes back to the writing of John Locke, who contended that legitimate government comes from the consent of the governed, who have “natural rights,” prohibiting the government from being corrupt (42).…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It became clear soon after the Articles of Confederation were implemented that the document had certain flaws that weakened the newly created United States. A new document, the Constitution, was drafted to replace the Articles. Many people supported the Constitution, but some disagreed with it. Both the Federalists and the anti-Federalists provided valuable insight into the creation of the Constitution. Some of the arguments presented by the anti-Federalists were that it lacked a Bill of Rights, which would guarantee citizens freedoms; that the strong central government would be unable to govern such a large territory; and that the government that was established was too close to the British system they had just overcome.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist 51 Essay

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-federalist#1 idea was to make the power of the government in the hand of the states more than the power of the central government. Only small states support Anit-federalist because they want to make decision by themselves. Unlike the assumptions of the anti-federalists, the federal system did not take all the rights form the states but in reality gave them most of the decision making right that make the states have right to raise the tax to get more money, but the supreme law of the land is the constitution make sure that the union is the most powerful thing in the…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays