Human Enhancement Analysis

Decent Essays
Although human enhancement technologies may benefit societies in important ways, their use at work also raises serious ethical, political and economic questions that demand broad consideration. These questions include, how do the public view these technologies, what are the consequences of their long-term use in individuals? Who pays? If the private individual pays, then the rich will get cleverer. Another set of authenticity concerns arises in arguments that focus on enhancement interventions performed by parents in conceiving and raising their children. Here, the claim is that offspring who have no agency in deciding whether to be enhanced are cheated of their authentic identities and the autonomy to create themselves as others normally do.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Uncc300 Task 2 Case Study

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (Blyth et al., 2008 & Dahl, 2007). This is essentially the assumption that parents will also want to choose other physical aspects of their child (e.g. hair/eye colour); further negating the unconditional love a parent is expected to have for their child (Blyth et al., 2008). The negative debate surrounding ? designer babies? reflects quadrant 2B: ? Dignity that humans acquire (or lose) through moral or immoral behaviour?…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel in “The case Against Perfection” talks about benefits and drawbacks in genetic engineering, designer children, and bionic athletes. The benefit is that improving technological advancement, we will be able to treat and prevent many diseases that are prevalent today. The downside is that exponential growth of technologies will allow us to manipulate our own nature, to enhance our cognitive abilities, physical strength, and choose genetic traits of our children to make ourselves “better than well” (Sandel, 2004). Sandel argues that Genetic engineering offers us the power to master our nature, but that kind of power & choice threatens our ability to appreciate life as a gift, and erode human agency by allowing us to serve our purposes…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Buchanan argues against that enhancement is always wrong because it will change or destroy human nature by stating “I will argue that there is nothing wrong, per se, with altering human nature” (Buchanan, 142). Buchanan believes it will neither change nor destroy human nature by containing the “bad as well as good characteristics and there is no reason to believe that in every case eliminating some of the bad characteristics would so imperil the good ones” (Buchanan, 142). Therefore, altering enhancements will neither change nor destroy human nature in the context of Buchanan. Buchanan disagrees to a principle of objection of enhancement because he believes enhancement shouldn’t be judged based on principle. A principle objection includes…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parental manipulation of progeny is where parents increase their own reproductive success (fitness) by eliminating particular offspring. This is seen in nonhuman primates societies when males engage in…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whose Body is This? Whose body is this? Mine or societies? Mine, or my swayed conscious’?…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    when the executive shows up, what he doesn’t realize is, I’m actually debriefing him on behalf of a competitor.” He speaks with pride knowing that he is a spy, taking pride in his profession. From the public’s perspective, he is a harmless job interviewer, but from the private image of who actually is, Barry has an ulterior motive that ultimately benefits himself. He throws away the feelings of the people he is “interviewing”, and thinks only of the greater reward he will receive.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As “reading” our genomes becomes more available, I think each person should have complete privacy over their genetic information. It’s their personal information, and it’s their right to share it if they’d like, but no one else besides immediate family should have the right to use their genetic information. Immediate family should be allowed rights too, because it could be helpful in making important decisions or in emergencies. Employers and insurers should absolutely not be able to reject someone based on their genome. That would be purely discrimination, weather it saves them money or not.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a significant portion of our lives we do not know what future holds for us. Therefore, we are blissfully ignorant to our shortcomings and we are afforded endless opportunities; provided that we put forth the necessary effort. Unfortunately, in the distant, utopian future presented in Gattaca humans are genetically engineered to the most elite standard. Furthermore, those unfortunate enough to be the children of natural conception are doomed to a life of serfdom and they will never achieve their dreams. If they are to prosper, it is imperative they exert tenfold the amount of effort as their elite counterparts.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effect technology may have on future human evolution can be determined via analysis of various developmental and technological factors. Uncovering the possibilities of potential further evolution requires a familiarisation with Darwinian development and the purpose for its occurrence. A reflection of current and past technologies and their subsequent repercussions on society also assist in defining the specific impacts on future humans. In order predict the essence of mankind in coming years, a realistic idea of future technology must be expected, taking into account technology currently being developed, which soon, may be utilised everyday. In addition, the transhumanist movement must be taken into consideration as humans persist in combining themselves with technology.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Persons Of Color Analysis

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The author uses the term persons of color to be politically correct when addressing people other than Caucasian within the United States. Before the term persons of color were approved as the politically correct phrase, all the people within the country other than Caucasian were called minorities. Minorities should have been kept as the politically correct term to use since Caucasian are the majority in the country. According to the 2010 United States census, there are 308,745,538 people. There are 196,817,552 Caucasian, 37,685,848 African American, 2,247,098 American Indian or Alaska Native, 14,465,124 Asian, 481,576 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 5,966,481 two or more races, 604,265 some other race and 50,477,594 Hispanic or Latino…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He dismisses the idea that immunization against infectious disease is a form of genetic enhancement because the goal behind immunization is to prevent disease and for that reason the process of enhancement for immunization meets the definition of the goal of medicine. After examining medical procedures and how they may be valid gene therapy or invalid genetic enhancement, Glannon reasons examines the moral concerns of genetic enhancement. His first moral objection to genetic enhancement states that “enhancement would be unfair because only those who could afford the technology would have access to it.” He reasons that this would put those unable to afford the treatment at a socially competitive disadvantage. Without the treatment, individuals would fail to reach the new physical and mental standards set forth by genetic…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The conditioning also removes self identity from the children by the bokanovsky process. This process takes one single embryo and divides it “from eight to ninety-six buds, and every bud will grow into a perfectly formed embryo, and every embryo into a full-sized adult. Making ninety-six human beings grow where only one grew before. ”(6). This absolutely eliminates identity when almost everyone looks the same and everyone is nurtured the same so, there is nothing unique about anyone.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay #2: Disability or Enhancement? In this essay, I will argue that Gauvin’s parents were not morally justified in their decision to permanently make their son born and remain deaf because by doing so the parents are treating the child as a lesser equal and are inflicting psychological harm. The role of parents is to ensure the wellbeing, safety, and support of their child in hopes that they can become stable, independent, and functional individuals in the near future. However, choosing a sperm donor with a history of deafness or any other disabilities is morally unjust because it is specifically taking a trait and implanting it upon a child causing them a life of hardships that they have to endure.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Having a designer baby or spare parts child is not only immoral but also damages the natural cycle of life. The only purpose a designer baby serves is to prolong the imminent death of a preexisting life. The people born with genetic disabilities are kept alive by these spare parts children, who ultimately will pass weak genes to their offspring.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays