Michael Sandel The Case Against Perfection Analysis

Improved Essays
Michael Sandel in “The case Against Perfection” talks about benefits and drawbacks in genetic engineering, designer children, and bionic athletes. The benefit is that improving technological advancement, we will be able to treat and prevent many diseases that are prevalent today. The downside is that exponential growth of technologies will allow us to manipulate our own nature, to enhance our cognitive abilities, physical strength, and choose genetic traits of our children to make ourselves “better than well” (Sandel, 2004). Sandel argues that Genetic engineering offers us the power to master our nature, but that kind of power & choice threatens our ability to appreciate life as a gift, and erode human agency by allowing us to serve our purposes …show more content…
Although he would approve some modification of plants that are going extinct to main diversity and bring them to a certain healthy threshold, just like he proposes in human diseases. Sandel would not approve to modify plants to withstand pesticides and some of the harsh weather conditions. That would qualify to improve their abilities above the normal threshold. I don’t agree with Sandel because his argument about a role of God can be used to hinder any technological innovation because anything we do will affect the nature some way or the other. Modifying plants to withstand harsh chemicals and weather conditions are one of the main benefits of GMO. That is one the main solutions to maintain our future food supply regardless of climate change, growing population and unforeseen natural disaster. Lack of diversity is a major issue in GMO and Sandel talks about that in sex selection part of the paper. Sandel offers a solution to stop parents from selecting the gender of their child by not allowing them to screen or pick a gender for the first and second child but can screen for a third child. The same logic can be used to maintain diversity with Genetically Modified Foods. We can regulate the percentage of crops farmers are allowed to plant that are genetically modified and require them to plant the proportional number of organic food as well. This allows the farmer to maintain …show more content…
In several places throughout the paper, he mentions this notion that We can’t tinker with nature because that’s God role. He says that “one of the blessings of seeing ourselves as creatures of nature, God, or fortune is that we are not wholly responsible for the way we are” (Sandel 17). To support his thesis, he talks about the concept of insurance and sharing the risk between everyone. Although his argument was persuasive, we can argue the other side just as well. Blaming God for our actions can also set a precedent for all the ill behavior that Humans do to one another. We wouldn’t accept murderer to say I am not responsible for this murder, it’s God’s fault for making me the way I am. By Genetically modifying Food we are not disobeying God’s will but are merely making it better. Improving the status quo is a reasonable way to approach genetic advancement. It’s not morally wrong to want better future for our children, to want better health, and better Food even if we have to enhance some of the traits genetically. Just like you can’t stop the flow of river but only guide it, we won’t be able to stop genetic innovation, but we can set forth some guidelines that can make Genetic enhancements fair, responsible and still maintain our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They say the crops are environmentally safe and practically the same thing as an organic plant. For that reason they don’t believe GM foods should be labeled and consumers shouldn 't know. It has a very big impact because it could be very dangerous to eat because of all the unknown things about GM foods. Since there is so much about GM foods to be discovered and how it affect the human body the severity could be drastic. The scope of the problem is people just want to have the ability to know if what they are eating and feeding their family is a GM food.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although there are many tests, such as using nutritional analysis and protein analysis, to find out the potential risks to human health, to livestock and to the environment, they cannot 100 percent guarantee the GM foods do not harm our health and the environment. The long-term health risks on humans have not been adequately investigated. Because of the uncertainty, production of GM foods should be banned until it has been proven safe to eat and produce. Our health is the most important factor to consider. We cannot put our health at risks just because we want foods with higher levels of nutrients or longer shelf life.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Doping In Spiderman

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The society will benefit from preventing harmful diseases but the health risks the research poses is huge. There has to be more research done by bioethicists and geneticists to determine if this is possible in the near future. CRISPR-Cas9 promises to remove the genes for obesity, Alzheimer’s but what is being neglected to mention is the process of how this research is obtained and the societal impacts. Creating super humans will lead to uniformity and lack of individuality within the society, everyone would aim to look a certain way, physically be a certain standard, have the same intelligence as others. It would be a tamer version of Brave New World, the people that cannot afford to have their genes edited would be treated as scum.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gmo Research Paper

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The information on genetically modified organisms is divisive. However, people are not divided on the issue of starvation and malnutrition; everyone wants it to end. The two are closely related because it is scientifically proven that GMOs can do a lot to end those devastating issues when given the chance. The problem that interferes is the widespread panic about the alleged dangers of genetic engineering. Many are concerned that there are negative effects to their health and to the environment.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are also against GMOs because they want the food they buy to represent their beliefs and what they value. GMOs can be very beneficial for helping countries with high rates of a disease because of malnutrition. GMOs can be used to enhance foods to better certain aspects of the food. These enhancements…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the contrary these genetically modified seeds reported in causing health related issues on consuming the food grown from them. This impact can be reduced by the company by putting more efforts and investment in development and research to improve and eliminate the side effects of their products without much damaging the environment. Furthermore, Monsanto can employ a team to regularly check whether the negative effects are still being possessed by their products and if it so then the authorities can be alarmed about this and suitable actions can be taken against this…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free will basically paves the road for God to allow mankind to learn by right or wrong, but if God saves the baby from the burning building we are not necessarily learning from certain mistakes. Since mankind has the free will to make wrong decisions, evilness will run its course. In conclusion, Hick is saying in order for God to be who he is portrayed as, evilness must exist. If evilness did not exist, then mankind would not have free will and therefore, our universe as we see it today would not exist the way it does (The Soul-Making…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gm Foods Persuasive Essay

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although some research papers state that GM crops a menace towards our earth and economic system, their benefits outweigh their risks. Unless there was evidence stating that genetically modified food has large negative impacts on our health, environment and economy, we should not impose a mandatory law for the labelling of GM foods. Instead, we should educate the public about genetically modified organisms in order to understand why labelling these products is not necessary. The effects of GM foods on our health…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is not enough impact to the human body, or to the environment that would require any actions to genetically modified foods. There are some reasons why genetically modified foods have scared everyone. There is nothing to be afraid if since there are no reports of modified foods hurting people. Scientist modified some plants to have better nutrients than before. Genetically modified foods provide more food with less land, and are better for you because of the extra things the scientists add to…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we know consumers do not wish to eat food that has been treated with pesticides, and the pesticides and fertilizers can poison the water supply and cause harm to environment. In the United States, corn was genetically modified with the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) gene to against the corn pesters, which resulted in increased yields and reduced pesticide use. Growing genetically modified food can help eliminate the usage of chemical pesticides, reduce the cost of crop and the loss nutrition of the food. Admittedly Genetically Modified food have some disadvantages. We do not exactly know if the Genetically Modified is safe or not safe.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays