I like how the article starts by identifying three key factors in what ethics involves in different platforms of context. I think people seem to forget police officers for example have lives outside of wearing the uniform. I do also agree with basis of conjoining principles of philosophy with moral conduct. Principles and behaviors are taught and emphasized in different elements which can thus produce scrutiny on any type of person overtime. I’m surprised the emphasis of different environments isn’t presented because no scenario in policing can be rehearsed. Anyone can go through trainings to create a foundation of the job however it is not always a consistent and thorough guide for what’s ahead with different possibilities. I must say the
…show more content…
It is when ethics and doing the right thing when no one is looking is out of context. What is best isn’t working for the agency because everything needs to be cleaned up from each and every single ranking within the agency. Basically, it is looked at as the local police aren’t doing what is best for the civilians but more for themselves and touches base with examples of why and when it happened within history. Police have to participate in ethics training and review panels started in 1958 cited within the article. Did an officer violate a law? Is the agency going to have to be reviewed in a court of law? I support the use of such panels because police are being funded by the citizens through taxes technically speaking they are working for us, we the people. This has been happening through the dawn of time and in the article it mentions some police might say we are telling them how to do their job but forget that it shouldn’t have to those extremes in the first place. There’s an old saying, you made the bed now lay in it. This conjoins with unethical behavior and going against ethical behavior which implements moral and just values. It’s also important to cite within the article, “as an example of police corruption, the GAO cites Philadelphia, where “since 1995, 10 police officers from [the] 39th District have been charged with planting drugs on suspects, shaking down …show more content…
He was remorseful and I think he really just had a hard time staying loyal. Cocaine makes you feel invincible and overly confident and some people in America actually do cocaine to keep up with the jobs because you then make time for sleep substitution and bring in more money. Also, with everyone of his fellow officers watching it all unfold and letting it happen it probably only fueled the fire and he probably felt extremely powerful in essence. Money makes you do crazy things and temptations don’t help so he in turn became a drug addict and sufficed to his own demons and demise. Everyone has a shadow side and can’t resist temptation especially with money and drugs. I think he forgot about the bigger picture which was his family and son and fell in love with materials like his corvette. Personally, I would have liked to touched more base Antoinette Frank because that was pretty appalling and relatively unheard of to kill someone, a fellow officer, your
It is when ethics and doing the right thing when no one is looking is out of context. What is best isn’t working for the agency because everything needs to be cleaned up from each and every single ranking within the agency. Basically, it is looked at as the local police aren’t doing what is best for the civilians but more for themselves and touches base with examples of why and when it happened within history. Police have to participate in ethics training and review panels started in 1958 cited within the article. Did an officer violate a law? Is the agency going to have to be reviewed in a court of law? I support the use of such panels because police are being funded by the citizens through taxes technically speaking they are working for us, we the people. This has been happening through the dawn of time and in the article it mentions some police might say we are telling them how to do their job but forget that it shouldn’t have to those extremes in the first place. There’s an old saying, you made the bed now lay in it. This conjoins with unethical behavior and going against ethical behavior which implements moral and just values. It’s also important to cite within the article, “as an example of police corruption, the GAO cites Philadelphia, where “since 1995, 10 police officers from [the] 39th District have been charged with planting drugs on suspects, shaking down …show more content…
He was remorseful and I think he really just had a hard time staying loyal. Cocaine makes you feel invincible and overly confident and some people in America actually do cocaine to keep up with the jobs because you then make time for sleep substitution and bring in more money. Also, with everyone of his fellow officers watching it all unfold and letting it happen it probably only fueled the fire and he probably felt extremely powerful in essence. Money makes you do crazy things and temptations don’t help so he in turn became a drug addict and sufficed to his own demons and demise. Everyone has a shadow side and can’t resist temptation especially with money and drugs. I think he forgot about the bigger picture which was his family and son and fell in love with materials like his corvette. Personally, I would have liked to touched more base Antoinette Frank because that was pretty appalling and relatively unheard of to kill someone, a fellow officer, your