How Does Shakespeare Use Rhetoric In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
In class we have discussed numerous rhetoric’s from across Shakespeare’s plays. Within them, the characters are constantly trying to persuade other characters into doing certain things. Shakespeare gives many of his characters very different methods of persuasion. Sometimes it’s planting false information into someone’s mind like Iago in Othello, who manipulated the title character to kill his wife. Even so, there are times when the rhetoric fails and so did the characters that gave them. In the plays The Merchant of Venice, Henry IV Part One, and Julius Caesar, as each rhetoric tries to convince characters in the play to do things, Shakespeare shows how words used in rhetorics can change a person or thing entirely. In As You Like It, the play is centered on the beautiful Portia, the heiress to a vast fortune, whom marries Bassanio. …show more content…
However after Mark Antony comes out with Caesars corpse, and Brutus finishes, Antony delivers his own speech using Brutus’s words against him, Brutus spoke of his honor and how they Plebeians should listen to him because of it, Antony constantly says how honorable Brutus is “Brutus says he was Ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man-” (3.2 88-89) and counters Brutus argument, and turns the Plebeians against Brutus, recalling all the good Caesar did for Rome, how Caesar named the Plebeians his heirs in his will, where even the Plebeians speak in-between the speeches favoring Mark Antony over Brutus. Brutus’s rhetoric fails to convince the ones they’re speaking too, and like the previous ones the result is similar to Falstaff, Brutus’s failure leads to his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony also asks to speak at the funeral and makes an obligation that he will not say anything unacceptable about them. The essential three types of persuasion used in the book are logos, pathos, and ethos. Logos is applying logic or reasoning, and providing evidence to persuade someone. In Brutus's speech…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus uses rhetorical questions to get the pulpit to agree that if Caesar were still alive, he would be a tyrant. Mark Antony uses a fact to get the audience to agree with him. " He hath brought many captives home to Rome/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill:/ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" (16-18 IIIii).…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upon Julius Caesar’s funeral, in William Shakespeare's, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, both Brutus and Antony attempted to persuade the people of Rome to believe two entirely different stories, and only one them were victorious. Both speeches were crafted with different methods of persuasion, and because of this, the people embraced their words differently. Both speakers were attempting to achieve total persuasion of the unforgiving crowds, and certain aspects of their speeches lead to either complete success or failure. Shakspeare was very specific in portraying persuasion and how it can be very manipulative and powerful if used correctly. Mark Antony more effectively persuaded his audience by using the manipulative rhetoric of pathos in pursuit of turning the tides of Rome against the conspirators.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any effective argument is guaranteed to have some form of rhetoric in order to push the persuasive agenda of the author. One such example of this is in Brutus’ speech after Julius Caesar’s death when he expressed his thoughts toward Caesar, but in doing so induced slight logical fallacies. However, he continued to effectively use rhetoric to persuade the people that Julius’ death was for the good of Rome. Brutus’ claim is that he killed Julius Caesar for the good of Rome.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rylee Sellitto Ms. Heaton RL 1 English 10 November 4th, 2015 Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays