How Does John Stuart Mill Create Happiness

Improved Essays
In most societies, such as the American society, people dream to be happy and to have pleasure. John Stuart Mill explained that every person wants pleasure in utility. Utility creates happiness through pleasure is what every person wants. The higher amount of utility a person receives, the more pleasure he or she will get. The more pleasure a person gains, the better life he or she will have. When asked questioned about morality, Mill explains that the right and moral thing to do is to do something that produces the most utility, even if it goes past someone's own personal beliefs. One example of utility is by the term, “white lies”. When people say a white lie, they are not telling the whole truth because they feel that the receiver would …show more content…
If Mill’s doctrine was correct, then Neo and the rest of the people who found out would be morally obligated to let the matrix go on and fool the world. The group decides that it is not moral to keep the lie going, but it is immoral. The reason they decided that it was immoral to keep people in the Matrix is because the civilians unwillingly live a life that is not the reality. The civilians are being tricked, but they have no idea. The resistance decided to end the matrix, and thus ending the fake everyday life that people are living. The group in the matrix know that the civilians will probably lose utility after awakening, but they explained that a fake life of perfection is a more horrible fate than a real life in a post-apocalyptic world. The rebel group and Neo believed that it was unfair for the civilians to not know of what has been happening to the world. The civilians were being tricked, and that trickery will not allow them to live a true, happy life. Mill’s theory would explain that freeing the people would have less utility than letting them stay within the Matrix. The group and their mission is the direct opposite of Mill’s

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both Kant and Mill created systems of philosophy that can guide the actions of an individual. Although neither system is perfect and they differ greatly, both have redeeming characteristics that attract believers. It can be seen that Mill’s utilitarianism attempts to remedy the problems brought up through practicing Kantian ethics. Although his propositions have strong merits, they can still be disputed by a Kantian. The example of lying can help one see the differences and problems with both systems.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that pleasure is something that can bring good things to people and thereby bringing good things…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the text he states, “…actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” Although I do not believe that people should lie if they have devious or malicious intent, lying can be the right action to take in situations of self-preservation, the preservation of others, or where it can be used to benefit a multitude of people. Lying is an act that should be used sparingly and not excessively. It should be used in special situations like, but not exclusive to, the ones aforementioned. Mill also makes the argument, “Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something admitted to be good without proof.” By this measure, lying can only be good so long as it is proved to be a means to an end that is a good in and of itself.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s philosophy contained a limited government or the notion of laissez-faire (hands off)! Concluding that men should be given civil rights as long as no harm was done to anyone. John Locke claimed all mankind was equal, believing that State of Nature has natural rights to freedom, liberty and justice. Meanwhile, Hobbes posed the notion that man was inherently evil and needed a monarchical government but both were against the Divine Right and developed the ‘Social Contract’(Carol 2017).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism as defined by Mill is not clear and cogent. I disagree with his argument because I think it is too broad and too exaggerated. I do not believe that if something creates mass amounts of happiness that it should be done. It is not genuine ethics because it lacks metaphysics. There are many gaps in the principle that are not valid to his argument.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What I expected to say: Discussion questions • In what ways can moral principles don’t have an exceptions? • Does philosophers, such as John Stuart mill, contradict each other? • Will there ever be a time which a Moral principle can be a Factual?…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is one of several examples that shows this is not always true. Let’s say for example, that a group of people come to your house asking where your mother is because they want to kill her. Now if one were to act in accordance to Mill’s theory…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stuart Mill Individuality

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Experiments of living are, in essence, just as they sound: like a scientist examines a test tube to either discover new information or disprove old truths, we must do this with our way of life. Mill encourages the full utilization of our mental and moral abilities to draw our own conclusions. Just as we need to exercise our muscles to strengthen our physical selves, we must exercise our decision-making facilities to strengthen our moral character. Unique from one person to the next, character is the result of observing, reasoning, and actively making a decision based on what is aligned with your soul. Mill discusses truth in the second chapter of On Liberty, saying that it must be under constant scrutiny and open to discussion.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, actions are deemed right or wrong based on the balance of pleasing and painful consequences that result. In Mill’s words, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” Mill makes an important distinction between higher intellectual pleasures of the mind, and lower sensual pleasures of the body. Mental pleasures are qualitatively superior to bodily ones, and thus have more importance when assessing the consequences of our…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays