Analysis Of The Trolley Problem: Kant Vs. Mill

Improved Essays
Kant VS Mill: The Trolley Problem The Trolley problem involves a runaway train that you are driving, but the train has breaks that don’t work. You can either chose to drive straight and kill five men working on the track or hit a switch that will divert the trolley onto a side track and only kill one worker, which would you chose? There is also a second scenario to this problem; the train can either go straight and hit the five people or a fat man can be pushed in front of the train, killing himself but saving the five people. In each problem you are forced to choose between saving five people or one person. The majority of people who are asked the first scenario question chose to kill the one person over the five. When asked …show more content…
Utilitarianism is a theory based on the principle that actions are right and moral when they promote happiness, but wrong when they create the opposite. This means that even though one has goodwill he might still be creating sadness. Good will is not enough to be moral, any action based on good will must result in happiness. Typically, when we think of an action caused by good will we think it’s going to cause happiness but that’s not always the case. This makes me think of a parent trying to help their kid study. I know whenever my dad would try to help me with homework it would just confuse me further and cause me to be upset. While my dad was tutoring me believing that it was good will, it didn’t have a good outcome. The utilitarian approach also applies to the Trolley problem. Choosing to let one man die over five because you think it’ll cause a happier outcome is technically moral according to Mill. He also believes that it is not morally right to use people as an end to a means. This relates to the obese man scenario. Mill says that it is not okay to use someone to get an outcome you want, even if it causes happiness. I agree with this because this means that pushing the obese man in front of the Trolley, even though it would save five lives is not morally correct because it’s using someone (obese man) as an end to a means. The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good. I think Mill’s moral principle is more liked and easy to follow among most people. This is because people like the freedom to do what they please. Being told what to do is just going to cause

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Mill believes that true happiness should be rational or ethical in nature. Physical happiness does not count as true happiness. Sometimes the pursuit of happiness or of human pleasures may result in pain as a result of sacrifices we consciously make.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant essentially states that to act in favor of the majority or in favor of yourself instead of following a universal rule or law is wrong. Because of this Kant’s Categorical Imperatives by their very nature reject the theories of John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism. If in Jim’s situation he were to choose to kill the man and save himself or the others, he would be seen as using the innocent as a mean to an end, an immoral act according to Kant. To be aligned with these Categorical Imperatives was to live…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Mill was a consequentialist in that he only cared about the outcome of his actions, Kant was a deontologist who cares only about the motives of an action. In The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, his second formulation of the categorical imperative, a rule that all must follow, states “man and generally any rational being exists as an end in himself, not merely as a means to be arbitrarily used by this or that will, but in all his actions, whether they concern himself or other rational beings, must be always regarded at the same time as an end” (35). Therefore, I can never use a person to obtain anything else. Kant’s view is practical, unlike Mill’s, in that it does not require the agent to weigh net happiness and instead lets him make split-second decisions quickly, and without lasting guilt, as the agent knows that his action was merely following the rules (even though avoiding guilt is not Kant’s purpose). In the trolley example, we cannot pull the pulley because we are purposely killing one man to save five…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: The book “Would You Kill the Fat Man?” by David Edmonds, presents a philosophical discussion on the ethical dilemma called the trolley problem. The situation that is proposed is that a runaway train is headed towards a group of five people who are tied to the track. Unless the train is stopped, it will inevitably kill all five of the people. You are standing nearby and have the option to pull a lever to to redirect the train to a different route, which has one man tied to the track.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs. Kant Essay

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This would further suggest that when following Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism, right or wrong is more so accidental and depends on the world instead of depending on an individual's awareness of the situation. If the student were to follow Kant’s advice, then they must follow along with their duties as a student while also performing through a maxim which they could will to be universalized. In this case the student must study for…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It makes utilitarianism theory look like consequentialist. This causes Mill lacking attention on intentions behind actions. He believes that motivation of actions is insignificant for judging one’s morality. Results are more important and critical in Mill’s theory. And here the issue I have comes, how are people supposed to know what results their every action would cause before they do it?…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mill’s effectively handles answers that critics of utilitarianism may have. Mill describes the theory of utility as pleasure its self without the presence of pain. What Mill’s means is that we should choose what is good and brings us to total happiness or pleasure. Mill goes on to say that others how have used the word in the past should reexamine their view of utilitarianism for it is not a black and white as they once thought. Next Mill explains that mankind has high needs of pleasure or happiness than those of animals.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant is practically the opposite on this point. Kant like mentioned above believes that an action is only good if it in itself is good. He believes in order to be good it cannot be based on the consequences of its actions. Kant takes into account what happens before an action to determine if it is good, where Mill focuses on the ends. I side here with Kant for he is able to better defend his theory and keeps it related to what we humans are able to do in regard to our duties not…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, a child was drowning and you were passing by, it is generally agreed within society that you are obligated to do whatever you can to save that child. This becomes a moral issue when risk is taken into consideration. Both Kant and Mill agree that if you cannot swim and your attempt to save the child would end in increased suffering, then you are morally obligated to not jump into the water. The morality of the issue comes into play when, hypothetically speaking, you do have the ability to swim and thus, theoretically the ability to save the child but you both end up drowning anyway. Kant believes it 's the intention that dictates morality.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Knowledge Of Neuroscience

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Neuroscience is a very informative class and provides a good understanding for advanced courses. It is revealing to note how the cerebral cortex functions in terms of human consciousness, language, and the ability to imagine, reason and think is what makes human beings unique. Furthermore, the four sections of the cerebral cortex called temporal lobe, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital lobe have such distinct functions such as auditory perception and reasoning. For instance, the primary motor cortex residing in the frontal lobe carries out motor function while the primary auditory cortex residing in the temporal lobe is responsible for auditory function.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays