What I expected to say:
Discussion questions
• In what ways can moral principles don’t have an exceptions?
• Does philosophers, such as John Stuart mill, contradict each other?
• Will there ever be a time which a Moral principle can be a Factual?
Talking points:
• Most moral arguments can be defeated by other moral considerations.
• All arguments have a statement, which they must have a link for the conclusion to be Valid.
• Most good arguments not only are valid, but also have true principles.
Summary:
• In the essay “Making Moral Arguments,” it’s about how moral arguments are reasoned and how validated they are. The essay goes on how each statement of the arguments can be true or false. Later in the text, it shows the reader how moral
Discussion questions
• In what ways can moral principles don’t have an exceptions?
• Does philosophers, such as John Stuart mill, contradict each other?
• Will there ever be a time which a Moral principle can be a Factual?
Talking points:
• Most moral arguments can be defeated by other moral considerations.
• All arguments have a statement, which they must have a link for the conclusion to be Valid.
• Most good arguments not only are valid, but also have true principles.
Summary:
• In the essay “Making Moral Arguments,” it’s about how moral arguments are reasoned and how validated they are. The essay goes on how each statement of the arguments can be true or false. Later in the text, it shows the reader how moral