John Stuart Mill: Does Society Unjustly Wrong?

Improved Essays
Mill sets up his argument by giving his somewhat of a thesis about how society when it does interfere it is in the wrong time or place. He talks about how people all over use this moral code unjustly against things they do not like. Also that people have this ideal where the public gives freedom and choice in all uncertain matters and only involves itself when it is universally wrong. He argues that no society is like that but acts like it does in the view of others. Mill gives examples such as most Muslims do not eat pork inside their country, or in Spain where they punish married clergy. This shows that if people want to push their moral code onto others than they must be okay with the same action done to them. He also gives how society unjustly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Often times the terms we don’t know who to fault when it comes to limits of legitimate law making. The terms “harm principle” and “legal paternalism” never come to mind when we are seeking these answers. This is remarkably ironic because both of those terms justify laws. In this essay i will go into depth on each term and provide examples of how they justify law and human morality. John Stewart Mill, inadvertently created the term Harm Principle in his essay On Liberty, where he defends extensive individual liberty.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He argues that individuals cannot cause harm to others in society and they must give back to society and so if an individual does not fulfill these responsibilities the government can intervene. Mill believes in a public sphere where the actions of an individual impact other members of society as well as a private sphere where the actions of an individual only impact themselves. Actions can be positive or negative depending on how they impact other individual’s happiness and satisfaction. An individual is free to commit positive or negative actions in his private sphere as he is not impacting the overall happiness of society. However, in the public sphere, an individual must consider the impact of his actions on the rest of the individuals in society and therefore he can only commit actions that do not cause harm.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill, for instance, supported government, however, expressly stating that the power of government should be limited to prevent the government from “preying on the flock.” He believed that there needed to be certain political rights or liberties which would be regarded as a “breach of duty” if the government in place were to violate it. In fact, Mill felt that a rebellion was a justifiable response to such breaches of liberty akin to Marx’s belief that a proletariat revolution was necessary for progress. Such breaches may include the removal of certain freedoms such as the freedom of speech, which Mill believed was necessary for the advancement of society. Moreover, Mill believed in the establishment of “constitutional checks,” in which the community or its representatives gained some power of consent in important acts of the governing power.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “On Liberty” JS Mill suggests that conformity hurts both individuals and the societies they live in. He argues that it leads to an ineffective political rule because when a majority public opinion is formed, any nonconformist ideology or person is cast aside and loses its influence to change the society it is a part of, even if that influence might be beneficial. This thought can also be applied to our government today. In our case there is not one majority but a bi-polar spectrum that has stayed consistent for over 100 years, and the social pressure is to identify with one party or the other. Mill argues that when social pressure is upheld strongly by a particular society, those who try to shift the norm can be seen as “wild” or…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “On Liberty” mill argues the majority over the thoughts, discussion and action. Mill starts with an exchange of the authentic movement of the battle amongst Liberty and Authority. For most of mankind's history, this was a challenge between the subjects and their rulers, with the rulers considered as one representing station in an essentially hostile position to the general population whom they administered. It was the objective of loyalists as far as possible to the energy of this administering class in two routes: initially, to get an acknowledgment of certain insusceptibilities from strong intimidation with respect to the legislature called rights, and second to build up an assortment of agents of the general population, for example, a parliament or congress to check…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How important is freedom of thought? Benjamin Franklin is quoted as saying, "Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom & no such thing as publick liberty without freedom of speech. " Freedom of thought is defined as the freedom of an individual to hold or consider a fact, viewpoint, or thought, independent of others' viewpoints1. In Chapter 2 of John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, Mill addresses the issue of whether people should be allowed to limit, or eliminate, anyone’s thoughts or opinions.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays