The Characteristics Of John Stuart Mill's Genius And Originality

Improved Essays
The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive. I concur with his argument since originality and …show more content…
I agree with his statement since I argue that originality and genius are essential for society to progress, and they require freedom to flourish while conformity holds them back. Therefore, environments that hinder these qualities from thriving, especially those that involve pressure to conform, will prevent society from progressing because uniqueness and ingenuity allow knowledge, as well as political, social, and economic life to flourish. If humankind cannot advance, then this will lead to a stagnant and dull society in which one would not want to live. However, if these characteristics were to thrive in an environment of freedom, the quality of a person’s life would improve since people would use their individuality to provide different ideas and opinions to better the world in any way possible. Henceforth, one should not be afraid to show their originality and genius; instead, they should share it with the world so that knowledge, humanity, and the quality of life can keep

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt 3 Author Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote a famous quote by him, he said “To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.” This quote relates to individuality and being to yourself meaning like should conquer own goal and lead to your own life. Don’t ever let anyone control your life, or tell you how live it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement Emerson wrote? Audiences who are reading this should ask themselves this question to understand this quote, go through all the accomplishments that they done by themselfs to see how individuality could be, and even see if they living their life the way they want, or not be forcing to live.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas” in more ways than one. In the story “Harrison Bergeron”. The world has many similarity, when you think about racism in today's society. When you think about how we live in a country where people with different cultures are been treated unfairly. We live in a country with many different races, religions, ethics and color.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Nietzsche both analyzed the outlooks fostered by the ancients, Christianity and modern morality in regard to the qualities of character that each group developed. The two men held similar views regarding the Christians and modern morality believing that each was creating a herd like mentality where individualism was being suppressed. The two interestingly differed on their view of the ancients, where Nietzsche disagreed with their rationality, Mill praised their individualism. For starters, Nietzsche viewed the character that each society developed in the context of whether or not they fostered the will to power. Will to power for Nietzsche was the driving force of man, and he believed that any hindrance or alteration…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Common Core is a set of standards that are currently being implemented all over the US. But with this legislation, there comes controversy on whether or not this actually raises the standards of education and is overall an effective way to aid children in the foundations of their learning. Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his essay Self-Reliance, explains the need to follow one’s nature and have one’s own beliefs and opinions and not rely upon others to form one’s beliefs. This legislation of Common Core Standards and transcendentalism go hand in hand with the controversy covering this issue as some believe that the Common Core could be helpful and others believe that this new standard is going to be more harmful. Governors, state commissioners,…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s praise of eccentricity as a means of self-cultivation illuminates the philosopher’s unique view of discovering one’s self as a form of education. To break the chains of tradition and social authority and embrace one’s eccentricity seems, to Mill, to be a duty to both an individual and mankind. As Mill tersely claimed, “the despotism of custom everywhere is the standing hindrance to human advancement” (Mills, p.69). If an individual subscribes to Mill’s view on individuality, then they avoid the conformity of being a sheep in the crowd and get to experience society and politics from many different viewpoints and learn from the varied viewpoints of a non-conforming body of individuals. Despite this, Mills supports the idea of civilization…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “On Liberty,” Mill discloses his view that “the despotism of custom” is the antithesis of progress and development (78). Progress and development need liberty, because liberty lets people explore new ideas, and new ways of living, which can help people increase their standard of living. Once again, the processes of representative governments protect liberty better than autocracies…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The criterion of right and wrong controversy has yet to be concluded though many years of argumentation have ensued. Mill attempts to explain the criterion of right and wrong using the concept of utilitarianism. Utility is not something that should be contrasted with pleasure, but rather pleasure itself with the freedom of pain. The criterion of right and wrongness is introduced for utility as the actions are right in proportion if they promote happiness and are wrong in proportion if they produced the reverse of happiness. Happiness is defined by pleasure and the absence of pain and unhappiness is vice versa.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    We live in a society where you will always be given credit or blamed for one’s action. Each individual leaves a legacy, in their legacy he or she will learn something from experience and take it for a life lesson. Emerson once stated “Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members… the virtue in most request is conformity”. My interpretation of the quote is that society robs us of our identity or individuality. This quote compliments the Novel Scarlet Letter and conspires to the main character to the book.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one hundred people, were asked what does it mean to live the good life, no two responses would be exactly the same. Even though everyone’s response would be different, many of the responses would most likely include being happy. Similarly to how people’s responses would differ if asked the original question, everyone would have their own definition of what happiness means to them because certain words mean different things to different people. Many of the authors that were covered in class talked about happiness and its relation to the good life. The authors that gave the most insight into their view of happiness were Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although many try to blend in with the rest of the population, the few who break away and think with eccentricity stand out and make a change. In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, Bernard Marx, John the Savage, and Helmholtz Watson all use their knowledge and ability to be an individual in order to understand freedom and escape from average society and community. Bernard is very important in the plot of the story because he is the one who first openly shows individuality and freedom, and inspires other characters to do the same. He starts off as the protagonist of the story, but quickly declines once John is introduced. He is individual because he does not understand the norms, but wants to.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill is a very important and popular philosopher in the 19th century. He is one of the earliest advocates of Utilitarianism. He defines the theory of utilitarianism in his book, Utilitarianism. It focuses on the general good of individual pleasure. Mill tried to provide evidence for his theory of moral utilitarianism and refutes all the arguments against it in his book.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays