How Did Dred Scott Get Out Of Slavery

Improved Essays
Getting out of slavery in the US was very difficult prior to the Civil War (war between citizens of the same country).. Dred Scott attempted this by going to court and suing for his freedom. The final decision of the Supreme Court shocked America. Scott had lived in Missouri with his master, John Emerson, a doctor from the army. The doctor ended up moving to Illinois, a free state, and then the Wisconsin Territory where slavery was banned due to the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. The family later moved all the way back to Missouri where Emerson lost his life. This is where Scott had help from antislavery lawyers who helped him sue for his freedom. When he arrived to the Supreme Court in 1850, the trial began. At first, Scott was told he was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He wanted Dred Scott back in Louisiana, therefore having people force him into the household. Dred Scott was taken to court in Illinois, where he asked for freedom. He was granted freedom, but then he went to Louisiana, and he was not granted freedom. He then appealed to the U.S. Appeals Court, and the Dred Scott vs. Sandford (it had meant to be the Dred Scott vs. Sanford, but the person who had written the case down had miswritten it, therefore it has been vs. Sandford) case had said that he is not free. That case was quite obviously, quite outrageous.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While in office there was the dred scott decision, The Kansas question,Panic of 1857. Which states were admitted into the Union. Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case. The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was a bold move by Scott since he was an african-american slave at that time to go against a federal court ruled by whites. However, he had the courage and passion to fight for the rights that he thought he was entitled to. Roger B. Tawney, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, disagreed strongly with Scott’s points and request. Tawney was strongly opposed to an abolitionist movement and believed that slavery was ethically and morally right. The final verdict in the case was that no slaves, even those who were free, would ever be granted citizenship and treated one hundred percent as an official United States…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the mid-18th century, the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision became a key contributing factor in the separation between the Union and Confederacy going into the American Civil War. With the conflict of proslavery and antislavery groups fighting for new states, this choice became a debated topic within the detached United States for the effect it had in the slavery legal and economic system. Riots transpired and differences between political leaders and Court justices arose as the decision was made. Historical documents, like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the U.S. Constitution, were used within this court case by Chief Justice Roger Taney to lead towards the defeat of Scott.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott married his fellow slave, Harriot Robinson. Together they would have two girls and would continue to “work” under Dr. Emerson. In 1840, Dr. Emerson would leave his slaves, and wife in St. Louis to go and serve in the army for two years. When he returned he moved them to Iowa, which was a free territory, but the Scott’s would not claim their freedom. Dr. Emerson gave Dred Scott and his family a lot of freedom, but they were still entitled to him.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emerson had a lengthy stay in Illinois in which Scott was with him. Scott believed this stay gave him the legal standing to make a claim for freedom, likewise his stay in the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery was also prohibited. But Scott never made the claim while living in the free lands, perhaps because he was unaware of his rights at the time, or fearful of possible repercussions. After two years, the army transferred Emerson to St. Louis, Missouri, then to Louisiana; Scott was summoned a year later.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti-Slavery Movement By the mid-1800, American was a prosperous young nation. But much of the wealth had been made at the expense of the slaves. The slavery system particularly in the South had been increasingly inhumane and the horrors ate away at the heart of the country. After waging war with England for independence, some people believed it would be hypocritical to deny rights to African American.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott then got another suit government court. Scott 's lord kept up that no immaculate blooded Negro of African plunge and the relative of slaves could be a national in the feeling of Article III of the Constitution. At the point when the Army requested his lord to retreat to Missouri, he brought Scott with him back to that slave state, where his lord kicked the bucket. In 1846, Scott was aided by (abolitionist servitude) legal advisors to sue for his opportunity in court, asserting he ought to be free since he had lived on free soil for quite a while. The case went the distance to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Nat Turner slave rebellion, panic was set throughout the South. Slaveholders lived in fear that their slaves would rebel as well, so they inflicted fear into the slaves by punishing them and keeping them in their “proper place as submissive servants.” Additionally, there was a push for all free African Americans to be moved out of the state immediately, because they gave inspiration to African American slaves to revolt against their masters. However, another outcome of this rebellion was for the emancipation of African American slaves in the state of Virginia. This caused exorbitant, heated debates between antislavery and proslavery representatives.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is an important aspect of American history; it has shaped our country into what it is today. The civil war took place from 1861-1865. Without slavery, the civil war would not have occurred. Slavery divided the north and south, the differing opinions on things especially slavery is what led to the American civil war. The south expressed how slavery was beneficial for the whole nation because everyone depended on the southern economy and slavery was key to the prosperity of our nation.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery in the United States tore the nation in two. Slaves started to rebel against their slave owners through acts of both nonviolent and violent rebellion, which played an enormous role in the abolitionist movement. The social, political, and economic impact of the rebellions reached far beyond the Civil War, giving black Americans a newfound identity. A day in the life of a slave was tiring.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction: Illusion of Equality Following the end of the civil war, slavery came to an end with the passing of three important amendments the 13th which abolished slavery, 14th that gave the right to citizenship to any individual black, tainted or white born in the US and last the 15th allowing African American men to vote. African Americans would finally have been considered equal to rest of the US citizens or so they thought. Even though the new three amendments granted African American their new rights they were cheated out of them by both the Federal government who failed to enforce them and by the State government who took advantage of that and allowed several different methods to still oppress African Americans and maintain white…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays