How Did Aristotle Believes To Understand The Soul

Improved Essays
Aristotle believes to understand the soul is to understand nature, “for the soul in some sense is the principle of animal life.” The purpose of De Anima is to understand the essential nature of the soul and its properties. Aristotle starts of with asking the question “what is it?” In order to figure that out is there a formula or way of investigating? Is it a substance, does it belong to the class of potential existence or is it an actuality, is it divisible, is it homogeneous? These are all questions needed to be answered to get a grasp of knowledge on what the soul is. Aristotle uses his familiar matter form distinction in order to answer these questions.
What belongs to the soul itself in contrast to what belongs to soul-and-body as

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind body problem questions what is the nature of the mind and mental states? How are the mind and the body related? How are mental states related to brain states? Descartes says that there are two kinds of elements in the world, bodies and minds. Descartes believes in interactionism which means minds and bodies intermingle with one another.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everything considered, our heart, mind, conscience, and soul make up the whole identity in an individual, and the soul is the primary abstruse aspects of mankind, while the body is physically…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the soul is the self, the mind, and it can know things – including the forms and itself – then how can it exist without a brain? And is the brain not material? And doesn’t the brain perish? The soul depends on the physical body, which implies mortality rather than immortality. And if the soul must be immaterial because it knows the forms, then the knowledge of the object must also be like the object in essence.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ argument for the Tripartite soul is as follows; “The same thing cannot do or undergo contraries at the same time, in the same respect, and within the same part.” And “the human psyche undergoes contraries at the same time in the same respect.” Therefore “the human psyche must have different parts.” Socrates claims that the soul has three distinct parts. They are reason, appetite, and spirit.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The underlying reason for the soul being a special material is that it affects not just our daily bodily processes, but also immaterial things (i.e. sensations of love, happiness, betrayal that are not tied down to one specific part of the body). This is significant because he means that if a person were to lose his arm, he would still be able to experience things like love and happiness. Even though he has lost part of the body (and therefore some little part of the soul that caused sensations in his arm), the rest of his soul remains intact so he is not deprived of the feeling of other sensations. In this sense, the body cannot produce sensation on its own and needs the soul. In this way, the soul acts upon the body (i.e. causes/creates sensations that can be felt), but it is also dependent on the body because the body acts on the soul through providing a vehicle for things to be felt; after death, the body ceases to exist and the soul has nothing through which to furnish sensations.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As to this I understand what you're Aristotle means; matter is potentially, similar to wood. Wood is matter that has the potential to become something, such as a table or a chair. Form, on the other hand, is what gives matter it's actuality, similar to a chair or table giving wood actuality or essence, not the mere shape of the table or share but the virtue of being. I believe this is what Aristotle believes soul is. The form of a body.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Phaedo Analysis

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates could also argue that his theory of opposites could also relate to the relationship between the body and the soul. As he says, everything that exists comes from its opposite. It is clear to use that the all-knowing soul is what is important to us in the long run, for it carries on past the physical world. Moreover, we also are aware the body is the only threat to cloud our thoughts and steer us away from nourishing our soul. The reason behind this obstacle in our physical lives is never clearly answered by Socrates.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore he defined the soul as being the “initial actuality of a natural body possessing organs and the “whatness" of the human being can only be discussed in terms of its soul. For instance the ears without its ability to hear would only be an ear by name. Furthermore E.B.Tylor believed that the belief in the soul was in the pursuit of understanding phenomenon such as dreams. Descartes claims that the soul is connected to the physical body but more specifically to the brain and heart. The brain controls the organs of senses and the heart is where a human feel emotion and passion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Aristotle defines and contrasts both practical and theoretical wisdom. Practical wisdom is defined by Aristotle as being, “a truthful rational characteristic of acting in matters involving what is good for man” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 154). In other words, practical wisdom is concerned with deciding what a good course of action for man is. On the other hand about theoretical wisdom, Aristotle writes, “a wise man must not only know what follows from fundamental principles, but he must also have true knowledge of the fundamental principles themselves. Accordingly, theoretical wisdom must comprise both intelligence and scientific knowledge”(Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. When defining psychological disorder we have to question what exactly do we mean by psychological disorder. I considered the definition presented in an article by Psychology Today. They say the definition was released by DSM-5 it states, “A mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbances in an individual’s cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental process underlying mental functioning”. According to class notes and discussions, abnormality, according to the consensus has not definition, but there are some clear elements. I think the main focus to acquire when attempting to comprehend a psychological disorder, is to consider…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato uses this same sequence of thoughts to explain his thoughts of the human body and the human soul. There’s the body, which is material, and there is the soul that is immortal. With this in mind, the soul includes reason, allowing it to be able to set its own morals. Plato claims that the soul will always choose to do good, if it recognizes what is good. While Plato shows the thought of the outside world to look into the soul, Aristotle suggests that the soul can should “inside” the phenomena.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The beginning of understanding oneself starts with identity. For centuries, philosophers have contemplated a common issue known as the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem is a philosophical problem that asks the question of what we as people are. Are people a mind, a body, or a combination of the two? There are several major works that pertain to this problem, but this argument will focus on those given by Gilbert Ryle, Rene Descartes, and Richard Taylor.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays