Socrates Argument For The Tripartite Soul

Improved Essays
Socrates’ argument for the Tripartite soul is as follows; “The same thing cannot do or undergo contraries at the same time, in the same respect, and within the same part.” And “the human psyche undergoes contraries at the same time in the same respect.” Therefore “the human psyche must have different parts.”
Socrates claims that the soul has three distinct parts. They are reason, appetite, and spirit. Plato believes that reason should rule the other two. He says, “…[we call an individual] wise in virtue of that small part which rules and issues these injunctions, possessing as it does knowledge of what is good for each of the three elements…” (see page 673) According to Socrates, reason has the enough perspective to serve the whole soul and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In other words, he suggests that the soul, as a whole, has parts that are divided up into areas much like the body. For example, consider the virtue or desire to be healthy. Socrates suggest that while there is a desire to be healthy, there is also an opposite desire to be unhealthy. These opposite capacities are the kind that exist simultaneously. Since they exist at same time, Socrates would say that they are in direct opposition to each other in the soul.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    None of the three components are good or bad on their own, but in Plato’s writing, the right direction of a human individual and the human society is kept when the mind is in charge.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates establishes a soul with three parts to it: a calculative, a spirited, and a desiderative. The calculative contains the knowledge of good and bad, the spirited part contains the courage to carry out the will of the calculative, and the desiderative seeks those animalisitc neccesities such as food and drink. Socrates establishes an aspect of the soul that is distinct from the other parts, when he says, “Isn’t there something in their soul binding them to drink and something forbidding them to do so, something different that masters that which bids?” Socrates goes on to further say, “doesn’t that which forbids such things come into being - when it comes into being - from calculation, while what leads and draws is present due to affections and diseases?” One can clearly see how the calculative part is meant to guide and drive both the desiderative and the spirited parts of the one’s soul.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for Socrates to effectively argue for a tripartite soul, means to first acknowledge the existence of a soul divided into two factions, each faction somewhat reliant upon the other. Socrates emphasising the superior and inferior parts of the soul to be reliant on one another. Whereby, the ‘naturally better part’ comes to be known as the unified, rational part. Whilst the ‘worse’ part is exposed as the irrational appetitive part. Ultimately deeming the term, ‘self-control’ to the person who can successfully control the appetitive part and not be overpowered by it.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this argument, our souls existed before birth and knowledge is only possible through the process of recollecting what was learnt in a previous life . Socrates affirms that the ability to recollect knowledge must prove a souls existence before the human form . Through recollection, a person can be reminded by something of another entity that is similar or dissimilar . Socrates gives the example of a lyre bringing to mind the image of the youth to which it belongs . Socrates’ recollection argument is consequent to the theory of the transcendent Forms .…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The considerations that Socrates offers in defense of his characterization of philosophy appear to introduce an equivocation into his main argument. The equivocal term is “separation.” In premise (1) the term “separation” refers to the removal of the soul from the body in the sense 3 that the soul exists apart from the body. But Socrates’ defense of premise (2) makes it clear that in that premise the term “separation” refers to the disassociation of the soul from the body in the sense that the soul is not influenced by the body.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the Republic, Plato mentions the soul several times. Plato agrees that the soul is immortal and separate from the body. He also believes that the soul is eternal and according to Plato, the soul doesn’t come into existence with the body, but rather exists prior to being with the body. He believed that the soul exists inside the body until it dies. Because of this, Plato called the body the prison to the soul.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Further into the reading, Socrates responds to Simmias’ argument by stating that a harmony cannot be separate from a lyre, whereas the soul is not under control by the body, and if they said the soul was like a lyre they would contradict themselves and Homer (Plato 30, 31). Cebes also uses an analogy about a man and a coat. Cebes believes that like a man, the soul could be destroyed by wearing out (Plato 25). However, this objection is not very strong and is easily dismissed by Socrates. After more proof is given to Simmias and Cebes, the two both agree with Socrates’ argument about the existence of the soul, and the composition and simplicity…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to show that human’s soul is plurality, Socrates uses the principle of opposites – a single thing is never characterized by opposites at the same time, in relation to the same thing, and in the same respect. Since this principle must be true, it is impossible for one thing to be conflicted. Sometimes, it appears that a thing is beautiful and ugly at the same time; whenever such situation occurs, it must mean that there is more than one thing. For example, there will be no contradiction if a chair is beautiful and ugly at the same time, as long as it is beautiful in respect to its form and ugly in respect to its color. Otherwise, a chair must be either purely beautiful or purely ugly.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that both body and soul are parts of human nature. The soul is the total of the operations of human beings. Aristotle tries to explain his understanding between body and soul using an analogy of an axe. He explained that the body would be metal and wood.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays