On Being An Atheist: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
In 1968, author H. J. McCloskey wrote an article for the journal Question titled, On Being an Atheist. In the article, Mr. McCloskey examines and argues God’s existence (McCloskey, 1968). Overall, this essay will provide a viewpoint of the article. “The author, McCloskey,” criticized that there is not an absolute “proof” in the case of God, and should be avoided and abandoned. McCloskey refers to the arguments of “proof” as valid and important (McCloskey, 1968). However, this course provides the thought of nothing in life can be proven and accurate. In addition, it is possible to wrong with accuracy within anything. The presentation, Approaching the Question of God’s Existence, Mr. Foreman asked that individuals use an approach that is cumulative …show more content…
McCloskey. In the first argument, the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being” (McCloskey, 1968). In addition, many individuals question, where did “all things” come from and why. Authors Evans & Manis (2009) believe that things that are contingent, requires an answer from the existence (p. 69). However, there is no real reason why individuals exist nor is there an answer for why everything else in the world to exist. Evans & Manus (2009) argue that individuals are important, necessary, and exist, because of the contingent beings. The world and universe are necessary, because of the non-temporal form of the argument (Evans & Manus, 2009). In addition, Evans & Manus (2009) believe that the contingency of the things within the universe does not need to exist. This would include the sun, moon, stars, and even the universe itself. However, the universe does exist despite what is believed to be not necessary which is the definition of contingency. God was not created; therefore, He is not a contingent. God has always been existing despite of the objections of everything must have a cause of existence. If there is a cause for God’s existence, then there would not be a God as individuals know it. However, the creation of all things is powerful of the loving

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever desired for a short, reasonable response that will please both the brain and the soul? In the pursuit of basic human rights, numerous individuals have searched for this fulfillment in religion. Webster defines religious as one`s belief in God, as well as rules used to worship a God. Since the beginning of time, religion was questioned, and it`s origin; consequently, they headed toward the sea to find some answers. Although we are not able to confirm the existence of God, we can provide proof of the power of religion.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCloskey makes the following statement challenging this argument, “The mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” (2) There is definitely a reason for our universe and why it is the way it is. Evans and Manis make a valid point when they say that there appears to be no natural reason why our universe exists versus nothing existing. Many of the items in our universe are contingent meaning that they exist but they do not necessarily have to exist. When this is taken into consideration then it leads one to wonder what purpose those items have for existing at all.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Breaking Through the epistemological mist: Fichte’s theory on Faith In 1798, Johann G. Fichte published his consequential essay ‘On the Ground of our Belief in a Divine World-Governance’ (Über den Grund unsers Glaubens an eine göttliche Weltregierung) . Fichte presents in this essay the key points of his idea on faith, which is important and deeply embedded in the system of his philosophy. Both the content and the insufficiently clear manner of this essay cause a set of serious argument that is called the ‘Atheism Dispute’, which in consequence cased a disrepute on Fichte himself and finally the dismissing of him from his position in Jena University.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    McCloskey tempts the theists to look for answers and reasoning in a different way with his statement. In response, Evan and Manis say that the thrust of the non-temporal argument is that present existence of contingent objects requires that there be a necessary being” (Evans & Manis, 2009). As mentioned McCloskey claims that everything requires a cause for its existence; therefore God requires a cause for his existence. Evans and Manis discuss it this way, the argument assumes that all contingent beings require a cause for their existence; however, God is not a contingent being; only a self-existent or necessary being can qualify for the title of “God.” (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atheist Christopher Hitchens in his book, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything throws down the gauntlet, defaming the moralist worldview as, “The person who is certain, and who claims divine warrant for his certainty, belongs now to the infancy of our species.” Contrasting, Francis Beckwith’s observation in his work, Politics for Christians: Statecraft as Soulcraft that scientism’s post modernism worldview demands a counterbalance of religious moralism in public policy. In 2017, the cognitive war for the soul of America demands an answer. This paper will address the role of religion, morality and worldview on the creation of public policy.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Emory University’s English professor, Mark Bauerlein, became beautifully transparent in his published article, “My Failed Atheism”. He shared his testimony of how he has constantly struggled with summoning up a belief in God all throughout his life. However, unlike most proclaimed atheists, Bauerlein admits that he wants to believe with all his heart. He quotes in the eleventh paragraph, “The discovery [of atheism] didn’t free me, it crushed me.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among the main arguments for the presence of God is referred to as cosmological argument and it affirms that the flora and fauna that make the world were not capable existing on their own and therefore there ought to be something that brought them into their right place. The initial cause for the world to begin was God according to this argument. Since God was the main source of the universe’s presence, it has therefore been concluded that God really exists. This argument has however been met with many criticisms from scholars. One of the criticisms is that if something requires a cause to exist, Then God also required a cause to exist.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It argues from an individual occurrence to a general conclusion. The cosmological argument is widely studied and supported by various scholars from Aquinas, to Stannard. However, the cosmological argument does not come without challenges. From theories such as the Big Bang, to Russell’s theory that the universe is simply a brute fact. In this essay we will discuss in detail the cosmological argument and it’s theory for the existence of God and how these may fit with modern theories.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Atheism Argument

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    gold, water, plants, basically anything and everything on earth that has been created was made by God. These objects did not just fall out of the sky and just become being, an intelligent being had to make it. After this large break down of the three main arguments on the existence of God, the next mission was the rebuttals to oppose the existence of God, which brings in the Atheism argument. This argument breaks down the problem of evil from the atheism point of view.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, my personal Ataraxia has longed for the answer to God’s existence. The philosophies I will entail within my research paper are; The Pragmatic Theory, Skepticism, existence precedes essence, and the problem with God’s existence. The Pragmatic Theory is conceived by Williams James and to summarize; A is true if and only statement “A” is true works. A must correspond with our beliefs and correspond with…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does God Exist Essay

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the vast study of philosophy, a particular question has baffled even the most intelligent minds. This question is, “Does God exist?” Philosophers have considered the answer to this question for centuries, each coming up with their own argument and reasons behind their thinking. A platform of debate often used is Antony Flew’s parable of the two explorers, who find a garden so beautiful, that one of the explorers is positive that there must be a gardener tending to it, even if he can’t be detected in any way. The other explorer is not so easily convinced that a gardener exists at all.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays