Cosmological Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
Among the main arguments for the presence of God is referred to as cosmological argument and it affirms that the flora and fauna that make the world were not capable existing on their own and therefore there ought to be something that brought them into their right place. The initial cause for the world to begin was God according to this argument. Since God was the main source of the universe’s presence, it has therefore been concluded that God really exists. This argument has however been met with many criticisms from scholars. One of the criticisms is that if something requires a cause to exist, Then God also required a cause to exist. It is along this line that other arguments have been created. If it is with no doubt that some being brought

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is these two arguments that I find the most compelling arguments mentioned thus far in the…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments lay on both ends of the spectrum. Both sides have valid cases in the way they present each other. Among the more controversial…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God, also known as “Arguments from Design”, states that a designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern, and that designer is God. One of the analogies used for this argument is William Paley’s Watch Maker Argument. He gives the scenario: if you were to find a watch in an open field you would automatically assume that it was designed and did not just randomly form out of thin air. Based off this argument, if you agree that the universe and its inhabitants are designed in some way for a purpose, then there must be a designer responsible, which would be God. Believers in the Teleological Argument also argue that scientists and evolutionists are unable to explain how complex organisms such as the eye originated.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Teleological Argument The existence of God can be supported by the design argument or teleological arguments that conclude: since nature looks like it was designed, then nature was or has a designer which we call God. Not only is nature designed but things humans have created are designed also. In order to have something in existence, it must have a creator which must have designed that something. A number of arguments utilize design arguments in favor of the existence of God.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cosmological argument The cosmological argument is a well known argument that attempts to prove the existence of God. The most common leader of the argument is Thomas Aquinas who devised Five Ways to prove the existence of God, which he referred to as “demonstration.” It comes to the conclusion that God exists from posteriori because it focuses on cause and effect to come to an assumption that God exists, which contrasts with the priori approach to the ontological argument. Linear religions generally accept that God made the universe ex nihilo because in Genesis God existed at the beginning of time; therefore, He must be the cause of the universe because you can’t have an effect without a cause.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only adequate explanation, the arguments suggest, is that it was created by…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sense brute being do not have a cause, they can’t exist through the principle of sufficient reason. The cosmological argument is defended through this…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Response Paper H. J. McCloskey is a proclaimed atheist, and in his article, “On being an Atheist” he explains his views in a unique way from the 1960’s while refuting various arguments and views held by theists. McCloskey brings up a whole pot of valid points in his arguments. However, Evans & Manis, the authors of Philosophy of Religion: Think About Faith and Holmes, the author of Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions are able to counter and bring up many points and McCloskey’s points concerning the existence of God and the truth that the world was created by an intelligent designer. Mr. McCloskey pointed out in more than one occasion the existence of the universe is not enough to show that there is a God. I believe that there are multiple options for our world and the universe is the “handiwork of an omnipotent, all-perfect being” (McCloskey 1968).…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relativist position seeks to reach a conclusion in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, succumbing to the very logical blunder that they pose their arguments against! The absence of evidence of a suprapurpose for our species implied through our general knowledge of the world does not mean that there is no possibility of an objective and general prescriptive guide to life. Concluding so is similar to concluding that since we can't see aliens, they must not exist. If we are to simplify this further, we must eventually state that an answer is not possible without a question. When we are making statements about matters regarding which a question has not been asked, we're operating on the assumption that the information our statements…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays