Argumentative Essay: The Effects Of Gun Control

Improved Essays
The effects of gun control I feel could be very dangerous. Taking away the right to bear arms could endanger defenseless families when an armed criminal breaks into their house. Taking firearms off of the legal market doesn’t mean that they still won’t be bought and sold illegally. An example of something that is illegal but widely bought and sold would be drugs. They are highly illegal but the demand for them is through the roof. So then, when the common law abiding citizen cannot buy a firearm for self and home defense, a criminal/murderer can just buy a black-market gun and barge into any house without a worry in the world. I feel the effects of banning guns could leave innocent citizens defenseless against armed criminals. I can see the good intention that goes along with the want to ban guns but realistically they just aren’t going to completely disappear. I don’t think that taking away guns from the people with good intentions, leaving them defenseless, and giving the people with the intent to kill the tools to do so. Somebody with the intent to kill isn’t going to think twice about purchasing a firearm illegally. In Australia, they made their citizens give up their personal firearms to the government to be destroyed. Since then, homicides went up 3.2 percent, assaults …show more content…
11,078 of those deaths were homicides, which means that 20,594 of these deaths were accidental, or suicides. Obesity kills over 400,000 people every year. Things associated with obesity such as heart disease and diabetes cause about half of those deaths. The other half of those deaths is caused from being physically inactive for very extended periods of time. Even though there are far more people dying from obesity nobody is going to ban food because it is not the food that is killing the people. I feel that banning firearms could have negative affects on America by leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless against armed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they have a clean record, then they simply purchase the weapon from a local gun store, or sporting goods store. Convicted felons and other criminals cannot even be near weapons or touch the weapon. This makes it difficult for them the acquire weapons, so they resort to theft or black market sales. This is imperative since it shows how criminals can obtain guns and maneuver around and avoid laws. They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without gun control chances are, criminals won’t break into your house as much. Why? Because of the uncertainty of whether you have a gun or not. Everyone with a gun will have a way to defend themselves, should anything happen to them. Criminals will still have access to guns, they don’t listen to the law anyways.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people feel like someone has taken something from them they don 't think straight they start act careless and can even start do criminal activity. If the right to bear arms was taken away it would make people like they no longer have any rights at all and it would make citizens feel like it is a dictatorship. Which is one thing that Americans hate is being told what to do. Also if guns become banned this will not stop criminals or reduce the crime rate. The criminals would just want to get the hands on the guns even more so they can sell it at a high rate for profit.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Violence Argument

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If these individuals aren't allowed allowed to own firearms it would prevent a lot of gun violence. If gun store owners and big companies weren't so stubborn and ignorant and don't let criminals and mentally ill people get a hold of a firearm we would have a lot less violence. However when it comes to these big gun corporations like the NRA money is the root to all evil, they would rather get and abundance of money than saving innocent lives on the…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Activist in favor of gun control believe that with gun control being enacted that the United States would not only be better off but safer as well. The other party who disbelieve in the need for gun control believe that with it the country will only grow more corrupt considering the facts that the states that have had gun constraints have grown more violent prove their point. Gun control would keep guns out of the United States for a short period after it would be enacted, but as soon as they are smuggled into the United States all of the citizens who had previously given up their arms now have no guns to defend themselves against robbers, muggers, or whoever it might be that threatens their lives. In order to keep guns better under control without taking away guns from citizens is by enforcing security in places like schools and for the government to keep track of who is mentally unstable and to make sure that there is no chance what so ever for them to get in reach of a…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that the term gun is badly used everyone is saying that guns are being taken away that’s not what they are trying to do with gun control. The government is using gun control to make it harder for criminals to get ahold of guns. Also it will be a bad thing because if you have a record for the state you will not be able to have your guns without going through a legal process to get the record taken away. It is for these reasons that I am against these and also because America should be able to protect themselves from criminals that do abuse firearms. Americans were given the right to bear arms by the founding fathers, it isn’t right that the government can just make a law to take away those rights but also I believe it can be a good thing to though.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lott argues that more gun control would do absolutely nothing, and be very ineffective. Lott says that criminals oftentimes procure their weapons illegally, and tightening gun restrictions would not do enough to completely stop illegal firearm trafficking. Therefore, gun violence would not be lowered. Lott compares this idea to illegal drug trafficking. Even though many narcotics, including marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, are illegal in the United States, there is a high availability of each of these illegal substances.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    They obtain them illegally and cause harm to the people around them. This was not the original purpose for guns, guns were used to protect what people want to protect. Banning guns would not reduce the crime rate in America, since criminals and psychos obtain weapons illegally anyway, all the government would be doing is preventing citizens from getting guns to protect themselves. If the government decides to ban guns, they…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays