Group Wound By Doris Lessing Analysis

Decent Essays
Thesis: To prevent the types of manipulation and cruelty done by the groups in the part, people need to be aware of and protect ourselves against the power of groups over individuals by standing up for our independent thought rather than giving in to the “Group Mind”.
__________________________________________________________________________
In the same way, Doris Lessing, the author of “Group MInds,” presents a similar view when describing the influence of group mind. Lessing believes that we need to guard against the influence of group mind and that we need to make ourselves aware of these influences. She feels that people have the right to speak out against a group, but not a lot of people have the courage to do that because their opinions may be judged.For example, there was an experiment done by researchers. Their was
…show more content…
The majority of the group was instructed on how to behave during the experiment while only a few are unaware of the true purpose of the experiment. The people in the group who did not receive instructions say that the pieces of woods are not the same despite the fact that one is clearly shorter. She feels that going along with a group was a consistent pattern and that it was hard for them to stand against the group. We are sometimes embarrassed and ashamed of the times we didn't speak out against a group. She seems to say that we need to acknowledge the influences rather than be emotional. We can't feel regret but we can try to prevent it from happening. Along the same lines, Lessing describes that people have different opinion but it’s hard for them to share it when speaking out against a group because they might get judged. She states ”People who have experienced a lot of groups, who perhaps have observed their own behavior, may agree that the hardest thing in the world is to stand against one’s group, a group of one’s peers” (Lessing, 1985, P.2). Lessing insist that going against peer

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Carol Tavris, the author of “In Groups We Shrink”, received her PhD from the University of Michigan in social psychology and has since then published many articles and books; Tavris’ works include articles for Vogue, G.Q., and Harper’s, as well as a handful of novels including The Mismeasure of Women. Using her knowledge of human emotions and sexuality, Tavris also taught in the psychology department at UCLA as well as the New School for Social Research. Printed in the Los Angeles Times in the early 1990’s the article “In Groups We Shrink” leads one to predict that the piece will explain in-depth about how group socialization differs from one-on-one contact and how each person’s self-assurance changes. The author stayed true to her title, the article is very much so about how when individuals become part of a group they often lose their self-reliance and wait for someone else to make the first move. In the article, the author mentions two particular names: Kitty Genovese and Rodney King.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main challenge of this group situation is that there was a sudden rise of conflict among members at the beginning to mid phase of the project. This resulted the possible development of groupthink (Janis, 2008). As a leader in this situation, I would firstly feel lousy and disappointed in myself that I didn’t take note of group’s division and how the meeting could be more inclusive of everyone’s opinion (Chadha, 2016). However, at that point, I would also probably feel confused but yet curious as to why it was suddenly voiced out, hence thought that I should facilitate to explicit the thoughts and feelings of each member to better understand as well.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She explains the fact that she believes she deserves the right to equality just like every other African American woman would like to as well. With her consistently states the same rhetorical question to build more and more of the emotion into her audience as if they could feel the discrimination onto them and how they would like to be free from the burden that others bring onto them. As she stated her rhetorical question to her audience she changes tones and the volume of her speech so that her audience understands her passion and dedication to the rights of others and how seriously it should be taken…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this conflict of persuasion of a group's thoughts on a subject to one’s own there can be multiple implications to how the actions of the self-community can alter to the group community which can lead to a change that the self-community wouldn’t have made if not presented with a feeling of wrong by having a differing…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groupthink is led by the influence from authority and peers. Groups grow to think alike and become convinced there is only one “right” viewpoint. Groups think it is disloyal to take suggestions for alternatives. Groups have narrow perspective and most likely believe they are fully right.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She brings up the case of "Emma DeGraffenreid and several other black women su[ing] General Motors for discrimination, arguing that the company segregated its workforce by race and gender." She speaks of inequality and the use of identity in institutions to "exclude and privilege" others. It is also evident that she stresses the importance of doing more than just speaking of intersectionality. Actions speak louder than…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groups, crowds, and teams can have an effect on ones behavior. Groupthink is defined as a kind of thinking in which maintaining group cohesive-ness and solidarity is more important than considering the facts in a realistic manner (Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. ,2013).Group polarization is defined as The tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of its members (Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2013). For example lets there was a small isolated school and people want to believe that they had the best football team and they had the best players. Eventually everyone collectively starts to believe that they’re the best football team and they may make the mistake of challenging…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are intelligent. We think through everything we do. This allows us to feel regret. Our…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If people do think for themselves, they can overcome prejudice. She also shows how prejudice can keep people from being friends. The effects of prejudice can be seen everywhere in our day-to-day lives, and never in a positive way. If everyone just makes the effort to be the best, and the most open-minded person they can be, little by little we could see prejudice begin to fade. Almost any well-educated person will tell you that prejudice is harmful, though few are truly unprejudiced.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the first day of the experiment she made the brown eyed students wear collars to distinguish them between as brown and blue eyed. Furthermore, on the second day she switched the collars so that the blue eyed would wear the collars instead of the brown eyed. She told the superior group that they were not allowed to talk to the inferior group, did not have to drink out of a cup rather than the fountain and had extra…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originally coined in 1972 by psychologist Irving Janis, the term “groupthink” has its roots in 1984. The Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology defines the phenomenon as “a condition in which highly cohesive groups in ‘hot’ decision situations display excessive levels of concurrence seeking that suppress critical inquiry and result in faulty decision making” (Aldag). Janis chose the name groupthink due to Orwell’s “doublethink” in 1984, a similar condition marked by the simultaneous acceptance of two contradictory beliefs. Groups with higher cohesiveness are generally more likely to suffer from groupthink. Janis asserted that “groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgement that results from…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    You also should understand it so that you are able to recognize it in your organization. Groupthink can be detrimental to an organization if allowed to continue unchecked. I make sure to be conscious of groupthink in my daily life and as a leader within organizations on campus. Edward L. Bernays very eloquently illustrated the reality of how damaging groupthink can be, “In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction, the framing of a group stage, is a critical stage and ought to be drawn closer with alert. Framing a group with individuals who did not volunteer to be a part of the group, has a far more prominent possibility for disaster than success. Each group must to begin with motivation to exist. For this situation it 's extremely easy to depict. A man is blamed for slaughtering his own particular father and this group of men must choose in the event that he is liable or not liable.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In The Crucible

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When we work together we are able to get so much more done than we would be able to do just by ourselves. In contrast, some negative effects of groupthink is the fact it discourages individual responsibility and creativity. When we work alone we are able to focus on strengthening and carrying out our own ideas, but when we are in a group we are influenced by other people’s ideas and how them might be better or worse than our own. Also when we work alone we must be responsible to get the task done or find a solution for something in a timely and neat manner. Also when we work as a group this could create fighting such as when Hathorne says, “Why do you hurt these children?”…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This implies there will always be a power struggle between groups, even those of the most cooperative and sociologically mindful individuals behaving as part of a collective. Being mindful allows one to see how information is linked to power and the extent to which that power can make things happen based upon the resources at hand to devise as accurate and complete a view of the world as possible. This will help us “be less susceptible to the illusions that are supposed to keep us polite and calm while horrors go on all around us,” Schwalbe explains (98). By observing the patterns of social life, we can also see how those in power use what is most meaningful to people to keep them compliant with the status quo and more readily opposed to the common enemy of their in-group. This includes shaping public opinion about the meaning of appearances and how those meanings determine the ways in which we interact with others.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays