Groupthink: The Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster From 2003

Decent Essays
Groupthink is led by the influence from authority and peers. Groups grow to think alike and become convinced there is only one “right” viewpoint. Groups think it is disloyal to take suggestions for alternatives. Groups have narrow perspective and most likely believe they are fully right.
Groupthink can be detrimental. The Columbia space shuttle disaster from 2003 is an example. There were concerns that foam had broken loose during the launch and had possibly damaged tiles on the nose. Engineers informed NASA officials suggesting that the crew should do a “space walk” to examine it. However, the team in charge did not listen to the warnings. They were convinced a piece of foam that was less than two pounds would not seriously harm the shuttle.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In her article, What is Groupthink?, author Kendra Cherry discusses the concept of majority opinions in order to have multiple groups of people have agreements. People argue that groupthink occurs when a group of people work together and one opposes an idea and one person does not agree with the idea. This is helpful to the group because other ideas should be brought to the table. The concept of groupthink is related to the early settler’s experience because they had to work together in order to survive the obstacles they went through. Effects of groupthink on the settlers can be seen when they had to work with the natives to survive a harsh winter.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main challenge of this group situation is that there was a sudden rise of conflict among members at the beginning to mid phase of the project. This resulted the possible development of groupthink (Janis, 2008). As a leader in this situation, I would firstly feel lousy and disappointed in myself that I didn’t take note of group’s division and how the meeting could be more inclusive of everyone’s opinion (Chadha, 2016). However, at that point, I would also probably feel confused but yet curious as to why it was suddenly voiced out, hence thought that I should facilitate to explicit the thoughts and feelings of each member to better understand as well.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groupthink – Space Shuttle Challenger Thank you for sharing this article enjoyed when it mentions, “that smart people working collectively can be dumber than the sum of their brains.” What a simple statement, but packed with so much meaning. Cult Mentality – Jones Massacre I could never understand poising my kids. This clearly paints a picture how bad cult mentality can be, to be manipulated in that extreme.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Bellah’s quote, I believe, is spot on in the fact that we need other people to help to hone in on ourselves. We can understand ourselves by working with others, loving each other and learning from other people’s mistakes. People this days are making it harder to find themselves by isolating themselves in clichés, suburbia. “There are truths that we do not see when we adopt the Language of radical Individualism.” (Bellah pg. 80)…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The need for meetings that people had to attend so they could be told what to think is definitely groupthink. The Party plugs into your home to watch you and no one complains. Winston’s response to conformity is he stands with his back to the telescreen…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Louis, I see your point with your common thread with all the mishaps. Can you give some examples from the reading of how you believe overconfidence was the key factor in causing these mishaps? I can see your point with all but maybe one being because of overconfidence and that is the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. I just do not see it. I think when it comes to doing things better it is easier to say we would delay or cancel a launch if something was wrong.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, one may think that yes, Hester committed adultery, but it isn’t as big of a deal. When questioned about it in a group setting, they may answer something far more extreme than their actual belief because they want to conform to the standards of the group. This is considered Group Polarization. Group Polarization involves groups of people who all enter with an idea, but after time together, the discussions often lead to a major fluctuation of their opinions on the subject. To explain this in layman's terms, they enter tipping the scale slightly to the right,but by the time they are done, the scale tips more excessively than…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Groupthink is when groups make decisions based solely on the views of a few group members instead of considering other, outside possibilities. For instance the group covered for John when he messed with Mr. Vernon. In a particular incident, John removed the screw from the door to the detention room and lied about doing so. The principal asked the group who had removed the screw and they all answered that they had no idea in order to keep harmony. The group lied and protected John in order to maintain harmony which is groupthink.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “Committees, Juries, and Teams: The Columbia Disaster and How Small Groups Can Be Made to Work” by James Surowiecki begins by explaining the twenty-eight flight of the space shuttle Columbia. Columbia was hit by a large piece of foam which has been broken off by the left bipod area of the shuttle's external fuel tank. Surowiecki focuses on a narrow strip of the disaster which is how the small group decided that “nothing could be done”(Surowiecki, 475) about the hit and how their decision as a small group to come to that conclusion was wrong. Surowiecki begins by explaining all the different ways that working in a small group can be a bad thing. He puts in slight teasers of how a group could effectively work well like describing…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Groupthink, which is the excessive likelihood among members of a group to see ingroup agreement, is most prevalent when the need for agreement takes precedent over accurate or informed decision making. There are three main contributing factors to groupthink, all three of which are present in the article. First, the police officers were a highly cohesive group. In order to function effectively in emergency situations, being cohesive can sometimes be necessary. However, it also promotes groupthink.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When group members yield to this pressure, they may jeopardize the common objectives. This group dynamic, termed groupthink, has been responsible for major failures both in corporate world and in government (p. 35-36). For example, groupthink occurred in the Challenger tragedy from management and engineer’s agreement of the dangers as tolerable hazards (Riggio et al., 2008). In these situations, the amount of pressure on a popular launch of a space shuttle into outer space coupled with the success of NASA is hard position for a…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groupthink Research Paper

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moreover, groupthink undoubtedly leads to a steady decrease in mental efficiency, reality testing and moral judgements brought to bear by group pressure. Individuals entrusted with leadership and decision…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision making outcome. Jonestown is a great example of groupthink because everyone believed in Jim Jones. Hundreds of people thought it was a great idea to commit mass suicide in Jonestown, all under the command of their detrimental leader, Jim Jones even though some of them thought it was a preposterous…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originally coined in 1972 by psychologist Irving Janis, the term “groupthink” has its roots in 1984. The Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology defines the phenomenon as “a condition in which highly cohesive groups in ‘hot’ decision situations display excessive levels of concurrence seeking that suppress critical inquiry and result in faulty decision making” (Aldag). Janis chose the name groupthink due to Orwell’s “doublethink” in 1984, a similar condition marked by the simultaneous acceptance of two contradictory beliefs. Groups with higher cohesiveness are generally more likely to suffer from groupthink. Janis asserted that “groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgement that results from…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In The Crucible

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The idea of the word groupthink is defined as “the practice of thinking or making decisions as a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility” (Oxford Dictionary). When making decisions using groupthink individual responsibility is discouraged, because of the fact that your own ideas might not come into play or the group you are making a decision with might not like it or think it would help the situation. One might also say it discourages individual responsibility, because you are not taking the responsibility to solve the problem on your own. On the other hand, groupthink can be used to help reach a final decision as a team and open up the chance for new ideas to be formed and discovered. When you work as a team…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays