Children learnt the lesson of what happened to soldiers who were defeated.” The Romans were desensitized to death from early childhood. The children learned that if you are defeated in combat, steal, or break any laws that there is no tolerance, just death. From the beginning of their life, it was just the cultural norm to see criminals dead in the square as a reminder of what happens when you disobey. Public executions were also reminders to slaves, subjects, citizens, and non-combatants that they would pay if they betrayed their …show more content…
It was where the Romans went to watch gladiatorial fights, slaughter of animals, and plenty of criminal executions. The large structures were a big tool in keeping Rome in order, for it provided a form of escapism. If you were a poor Roman, you could go and watch the killings and cheer for blood and death with others. Gladiatorial games went on until the early fifth century AD, even though philosophers and later Christians strongly disapproved. The games continued on with wild-beasts executions until the sixth century. It was proof that even though some people did not agree with the harsh deaths as a form of entertainment, that Rome’s culture was so deeply rooted in violence and death that their voices did little to change Rome. Gladiatorial shows were also the bread and circus that held Rome together for centuries. “Public participation, attracted by the splendor of the show and by distributions of meat...” The city gave the Romans entertainment and free food. It was how Rome kept the 50-60 million people under control. “The Roman people ‘wrote Marcus Aurelius’ is held together by two forces: wheat doles and public shows.” Without the bread and circus that bewitched every social class, it would be probable that Rome wouldn’t have lasted nearly as