Reasons For The Fall Of The Roman Empire

Improved Essays
The Empire of Rome was certainly one of the greatest in the history of mankind, but it fell. Why did it so? Given the complexity of the Empire’s organization and its long-lasting life, it is hard to assign one or two exact reasons which may exclusively be accountable for its fall. The point is that there were many reasons generated by many different triggers that have contributed to the fall of Empire. One can point simultaneously to internal and external factors which played a role in the weakening of the Empire and on leading it to eventual falling apart. Historians have been discussing many reasons which caused the falling of the Roman Empire, the one that used to stretch in a vast territory in the Mediterranean, from the British Isles down …show more content…
There are also historians arguing that the Empire actually did not fall, given the fact that it continued existing in the East. Nonetheless, in this essay, I am going to argue that the Roman Empire, at least as a whole, disregarding the survival of the Eastern part for another millennium, had fallen. I believe that the reasons for its fall are not to be assessed individually, but rather as a chain effect from one to another. In this context, I have chosen several internal and external factors that I believe contributed to the final disintegration of the once unified great Roman Empire. Firstly, the fall of Empire is related to the fact that the army was weakened due to many internal and external reasons, making it easier for barbarian tribes to attack and invade. And secondly, another chain effect to be accounted has to do with the fact that Empire’s government organization for quite some time was not in a very good shape, encompassing various internal divisions, leading to the quarreling for power between different groups of …show more content…
Meanwhile, with some exceptions, the Empire had most of the times been in a quest to conquering new territories. At the end, this was the main factor which was contributing to the welfare of the Empire in terms of economic survival. But on the other hand, being constantly engaged in wars and in keeping the frontiers secure did require a vast investment in the army, which of course was a huge burden for the Empire’s treasury. Once the Emperors decided to give a rest to the expansion, other sources of income were needed, thus putting at stake the citizens who had to pay more taxes. In this context, maintaining the army and investing in it became a hard thing to achieve. Nonetheless, even if the expansion of the Empire retired, the territory stretching from England to the Middle East was already too big to efficiently sustain. But was the Empire too big to fail? I believe that in this case this notion does not hold. It seems like the splendor of the Empire caused its own collapse. Albeit of the Roman very good infrastructure of the time, the communication within such a vast territory could not be so effective. Controlling the legions from the central authority located in Rome became a problem. Due to worsening of the economic situation, the requirement of high taxes to substitute the need for money that once used to come from the conquered

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Diocletian and Constantine’s reconstruction of the empire, division into West Empire and East Empire, resulted in a loss of money, which was desperately needed for the newly altered military and government. Both emperors attempted to solve these financial issues, but all of their attempts fell short. In the Western Empire there was a lack of money in circulation, which caused the people to amass the little money they had. In the Eastern Empire, Constantine was able to circulate new coins during the time period of his reign. By the 3rd century the economic instability became increasingly worse.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because they had been at the top for so long they forgot their fight for glory, especially because a lot of their power was based in a strong military. This signaled for the end of the remarkable power that the Roman empire had because it lost its roots: the ambition to be the greatest. As stated in the source, this directly affected Rome’s success in fighting battles and they were bested by barbarians as a result. An easily exposed army was an invitation for more barbarians to come and exploit Rome, therefore putting pressure on its borders. Additionally, Romans could avoid being drafted into the army, so the empire had to pay for disloyal Germanic mercenaries to increase the size of its military.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Next, the economy completely collapsed because of lack of money and high rates of unemployment. Finally, the Empire suffered from several issues with the military and invasions. Part of why the Roman Empire fell was because of massive social problems. Some of these social problems include issues with the common religion, and the values of the Romans. The original Roman religion was one in…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the seemingly all-powerful Roman Empire has been blamed on a tremendously long list of mistakes and events that are still heavily debated in today’s society; some examples of the these events include the invasions of various barbaric tribes into Rome, the economic decline and overspending of Roman society, the splitting of the empire into the East and the West, and even the rise of Christianity. While all of these causes likely contributed to the overall downfall of Rome, one in particular stands out—the copious invasions of growing barbarian tribes into Roman territory. The Visigoths, Vandals, and Huns are only a few examples of the plentiful number of barbaric factions that had a hand in Rome’s devastating collapse (Andrews).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Collapse Of Empire

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Squires (2011), states the increase in taxes, imbalanced trade, and a weakened army that was being destroyed from within its own ranks, may have been the cause (3). Whatever the case, unearthing their lost cities and finding the missing pieces to the puzzle is the only way to answer the question. Additionally, the Roman society was comprised of many different cultures. As their expansion grew, so did their multifaceted culture. Furthermore, the complexity of their society is very similar to that of America’s.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What I believe to have been the cause of the fall was the expansion of land. The greediness that had taken over, where quantity was more important then quality. With having so much land comes many responsibilities that the emperors didn 't have the strength nor intelligence to do take care of, they were too busy living a lavish lifestyle. If the Roman Empire had been more selective of the land they took over and created a system to protect and rule a more efficient way, I bet they would 've been…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire. The theory of government corruption having a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So Rome was economically beginning to fall. From that there was invasions by the Huns which made the country weaker in terms of trade and economics. The empire was just really unstable after the invasions. In India it first started because of the Mauryan dynasty, throughout…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then there was also an outbreak of disasters. Critics argue that political instability lead to fall of Rome. Critics argue that political instability lead to the fall of Rome. However, the military mistakes lead people to think that military mistakes were the primary reason behind the decline of the Roman Empire. Two reasons to support the claim that military mistakes lead to the fall of the Roman empire are that the couldn’t conscription and that they didn't have the right armour.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Had there been Roman government that was effective in it’s final stage, the distant Romanized provinces would have kept Roman rule over the barbarians. In conclusion, the Fall of Rome was unavoidable due to three main arguments, the first one being that Rome expanded its empire too far which lead to military overspending. Secondly, the military overspending proved to be infertile, because it deemed impossible to protect such as vast amount of land with the constant attacks from enemy barbarian tribes daily. Thirdly, without supporting leaders and the Roman legions, the empire fell into a long sad spiral into corruption and political unreliability. Therefore, the “‘Holy Roman Empire is [no longer] holy, nor Roman, nor an empire’…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays