“J.K. Rowling’s monumental, spellbinding epic, 10 years in the making, is deeply rooted in traditional literature,” reads her review of the final Potter novel, published in 2007.” This input from Doyle is non sequitur, it only hurts and misleads the direction of the essay. It hurts the essay by adding on information that irrelevant to her main topic. And it misleads the reader by talking about another book series. There is really no reason to add on extra information about something that will not benefit the
“J.K. Rowling’s monumental, spellbinding epic, 10 years in the making, is deeply rooted in traditional literature,” reads her review of the final Potter novel, published in 2007.” This input from Doyle is non sequitur, it only hurts and misleads the direction of the essay. It hurts the essay by adding on information that irrelevant to her main topic. And it misleads the reader by talking about another book series. There is really no reason to add on extra information about something that will not benefit the