Having the technology to control nature and the environment is good because it gets rid of natural disaster. It is good because people wont die from natural disasters. When Hurricane Katrina hit North America and the Caribbean, it caused 1,836 deaths. In The Giver, these natural disasters don’t exist, so people cant die from them, making life better to live. Another thing that controlling nature would help with is the damage done from natural disasters. Hurricane Katrina costed over $81 million. In a world where natural disasters don’t happen, these damages cant happen either. When an strong earthquake hits …show more content…
While this might not seem possible, it very much could be in an advanced society. All the communities would have to do is convert arid places that can not grow crops to nutrients rich soil great for growing crops. There are large portions of the earth where crops cant grow at all. The people who live around here have to spend lots of money to get food. Also, if people could enrich the crops, the quality of them would go up also. Lets say a area already produces good quality goods, that region could make the food more nutritious and healthy. If we could enhance the quality and the quantity of crops yield, the efficiency of growing food would go up significantly. If the communities could implement all of these features, there would not be any hunger in the world or