George Ryan's Argument Against The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
The piece written by George Ryan struck my interest. Considering, I plan to argue against the death penalty this speech presented me with ideas to aid my argument. However, before I talk about the Ryan speech, I will talk about how the discussion in class aided in my understanding of how to approach my argument. One argument Professor Dullea addressed was the murdering innocent people argument. It was discussed that we spend so much time and money, so there is the proper things occurring to prevent the death of innocent people. I flipped this argument. I thought about using the argument with the idea that we do all of these things, but there are still innocent people being murdered. If all of this occurs, and we can not catch the right guy,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The family of an Ohio inmate whose Thursday execution took nearly 25 minutes and was marked with ten minutes of gasping and struggling will file a lawsuit over the circumstances of his death. Dennis McGuire was put to death using a combination of intravenous drugs that had never before been used in a lethal injection execution. John Paul Rion, the attorney representing McGuire’s children in their lawsuit, said at a press conference that the execution violated McGuire’s constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment. “I can’t think of any other way to describe it than torture,” daughter Amber McGuire said in a statement. While fighting last week to block the execution, McGuire’s lawyers argued that the new drug combination could…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson argues that the decision should be made by the majority. He affirms that while some claim that criminals deserve death penalties for their sins, many regard death penalty as a threat to innocent lives instead of the guilty. Because government’s goal of protecting innocent citizens’ lives is more important than executing harmful individuals, governments should go with the majority and stop executions. Nathanson also argues that the cost of death sentences and execution procedures are far more expensive than the benefit of executing criminals. Finally, Nathanson argues that our legal system is not compatible with capital punishment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “The Death Penalty: Is it Ever Justified”, the longtime democratic and former mayor of New York Edward Koch refutes the idea that death penalty should be removed due to the possibility of an innocent suspect. To counter, Koch explains that states, “Human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to guarantee protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again”. He goes on by adding that administering the death penalty is the only guaranteed solution. While killing these people does assure they will not commit murder again, the idea that an innocent citizen could be wrongly accused and receive the death penalty is an abhorrent thought. Once a citizen is executed, if more information is discovered…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “A Strong Argument Against Capital Punishment”, Lincoln Caplan expands upon Connecticut's recent choices about capital punishment. Connecticut is one of several states in the United States that brought the issue of capital punishment to the Supreme Court for debate and discussion. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional in the state of Connecticut. In this debate, the Democratic legislative side leaned against capital punishment; while the Republican legislative side leaned towards capital punishment. The Democratic side reasons that the death penalty violates the state constitution against excessive punishments.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, a man named Mark Klaas was interviewed about how he felt after the man who kidnapped and murdered his daughter, was executed. His response was that he was disappointed that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice had been fulfilled. Mark now knows that the man that killed his twelve year-old, will never cause harm to anyone else. But what if the court had decided that it was not a "heinous" murder? Closure is what the death penalty brings to many hurting families, which is why the death penalty should be allowed in any murder cases where someone was proven guilty.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Innocent lives are being taken away every year due to a mentally ill offender. Mental illness is a severe condition that interrupts the way a person think, feel, and mood. Most of the time criminals that are diagnosed with this disorder commit crimes knowingly. In addition to them knowing right from wrong. Therefore, mentally ill law offenders should be held accountable for their actions through treatment and punishment, but not execution.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American serial killer and rapist, Ted Bundy, was one of the most notorious criminals of the late 20th century. Bundy raped and murdered young women in several states. He was connected to at least 36 murders, but some thought he had committed one hundred or more (Bio). How could a person want this guy living, out on the streets, or knowing that his evil brain is alive thinking of what he wants to do next? Ted Bundy eventually got the death penalty and he more than ever deserved that.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reiman clearly defines that he is against the death penalty, because it does not deter criminals, proves to be inhumane, and tortuous. In his first argument, he states “If the government can reduce people’s tolerance for cruelty without acting unjustly, it should”, meaning the governments active role is deterring cruelty should only happen if it is done justly to the criminal. He does this in his paper by addressing the different punishment sentences in the “common sense principle”, in explaining it is only common sense that people will be more deterred by what they fear more, and since people fear death more than life in prison, they will be deterred more by execution than by a life sentence” (506). But he then raises the question that having…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1989, the infamous Theodore Bundy took his last breath as he paid for every murder and rape he had ever committed. After years of terrorizing the nation, Bundy had finally been seized and sentenced to death by electric chair. The Los Angeles Times described the people standing outside the prison, where Bundy was executed, as joyous while “a few were shocked at the celebration that filled the chilly morning air” (latimes.com). This was only one execution that has sent the nation into a frenzy due to the moral and ethical conflicts people have on this topic. Heated opinions concerning whether capital punishment is just or unnecessarily vindictive have thrived for decades.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have heard the argument that it is cheaper to lethally inject someone that has been found guilty of a capitol offense instead of sentencing the accused to life in prison. Although most people believe that sentencing an inmate to death on a capital case is cheaper than life in prison for tax payers in the particular state where the inmate is being held, however research continues to state that this isn’t always the case. Therefore, sending the guilty party to prison for life is a better alternative to sentencing the defendant to death row, surprisingly.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacoby’s basic argument is that flogging or corporal punishment should be a justifiable way to punish prisoners instead of jail time. A reason for this is there is an overload of prisoners in the United States justice system today. Furthermore it is actually quite expensive for the United States to keep all of the prisoners locked away, so one option to make it quite a bit cheaper would be to reinstitute corporal punishment. Due to the abundance of prisoners many first or second offenders are not charged, which causes the cycle to continue to repeat. Furthermore, criminals get put in jail for a variety of different offences including non-violent crimes and violent crimes, but both offences get the same punishment.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, written on September 28, 2003 for The Boston Globe, Jeff Jacoby expresses his opinions about the death penalty; he thinks that the death penalty is a system that has its weaknesses and errors, however he believes it is a system that needs to be in place to pro-tect us. The article aims to persuade the reader and to outline key points, why the death penalty should be accepted by the public and all. I will be evaluating and analysing the article discussing the techniques used by Jeff Jacoby to persuade, engage and convince the readers. In the first paragraph Jeff Jacoby shows sympathy towards the readers because he knows no law is “100 per cent infallible” so by showing sympathy he is reassuring the audience that he is on their side like the Government and wants the best for them, but he is also truthful at the same time by informing them that there will always be imperfections, nothing can be flawless as we are humans and mistakes will always occur.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, the issue of the death penalty is a highly debated topic. The death penalty is legal is 31 states, plus the United States government and the United States military. Many of those who support the death penalty claim that the killer no longer has the right to live because they took away someone else’s right to live. However, those who are pro-death penalty do not take into consideration that we are taking away the killer’s right to life through the actions resultant of the death penalty. They may refute that the convicted murderers forfeited their right to life when they killed someone.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment Google defines Capital Punishment as “the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is argued that the death penalty is justice for those who commit crimes deserving of such extreme punishment. It is argued that the death penalty is a punishment set up so that the grieving families of the victims will feel a sense of accomplished justice. According to the Death penalty information center since 1976 there has been 1,438 executions. The death penalty should be abolished because it is a barbaric, immoral, and small-minded.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays