American serial killer and rapist, Ted Bundy, was one of the most notorious criminals of the late 20th century. Bundy raped and murdered young women in several states. He was connected to at least 36 murders, but some thought he had committed one hundred or more (Bio). How could a person want this guy living, out on the streets, or knowing that his evil brain is alive thinking of what he wants to do next? Ted Bundy eventually got the death penalty and he more than ever deserved that. Since we can remember, the U.S has always enforced punishment to prevent potential criminals from committing illegal crimes. Because society has the highest interest in preventing murder, they should use the strongest punishment available to shut down murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing due to fear of losing their own life.
The death penalty should be used on intentional murders, but the question is what defines an intentional murder. An …show more content…
It put many lives at risk back then because they did not have solid proof that the person that committed the crime actually did so. In our current time, we do not need to worry about false accusations like we did back then because we have visible, latent, and patent prints. These prints are the prints by the murder that you are not able to see (Fingerprint). DNA evidence has come a long way and so has fingerprint evidence. Police officers can now test something that used to be complex into something so simple as in hair and skin follicles. We now can interpret biological evidence that has been left at the crime, by comparing the suspect’s DNA to that left at the scene (Lawyers). Therefore, the court no longer has false accusations when it comes to accusing someone of
The death penalty should be used on intentional murders, but the question is what defines an intentional murder. An …show more content…
It put many lives at risk back then because they did not have solid proof that the person that committed the crime actually did so. In our current time, we do not need to worry about false accusations like we did back then because we have visible, latent, and patent prints. These prints are the prints by the murder that you are not able to see (Fingerprint). DNA evidence has come a long way and so has fingerprint evidence. Police officers can now test something that used to be complex into something so simple as in hair and skin follicles. We now can interpret biological evidence that has been left at the crime, by comparing the suspect’s DNA to that left at the scene (Lawyers). Therefore, the court no longer has false accusations when it comes to accusing someone of