Mark Klaas Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
In 2012, a man named Mark Klaas was interviewed about how he felt after the man who kidnapped and murdered his daughter, was executed. His response was that he was disappointed that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice had been fulfilled. Mark now knows that the man that killed his twelve year-old, will never cause harm to anyone else. But what if the court had decided that it was not a "heinous" murder? Closure is what the death penalty brings to many hurting families, which is why the death penalty should be allowed in any murder cases where someone was proven guilty.

The court's job is to decide if a murder is considered heinous, but all murders should be seen as atrocious and thus treated the same. I agree with Alex Kozinski,
…show more content…
When students do not study, they get bad grades. When people drive too fast they, get a ticket. The price for murder should be execution. The Southern Baptist Convention stated that they, "... support the fair and equitable use of capital punishment by civil magistrates as a legitimate form of punishment for those guilty of murder or treasonous acts that result in death." The quote not only supports capital punishment, but it also says that it is "fair and equitable". The price of someone taking another's life, should be having theirs taken also.

More families like Mark Klaas' will be able to get closure if the death penalty proceeds for all murders. Dismissing the death penalty would lead to families living in constant fear and never being able to move forward with their lives. The Los Angeles Airport Peace Officers Association said it like this, "Giving up on the death penalty would mean giving up on justice for crime victims and their families." By widening the criteria for capital punishment, more families will be able to feel closure. Families will let go of what has happened, and move forward without ever hearing the name of that murderer

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It would give the citizens a feeling of safety knowing a potential threat will not be on the loose again. Also, a serial killer should be sentenced to death because serial killers have committed the act of murder multiple times. After the first time someone might regret killing a human being but a serial killer feels no remorse for the victims he has hurt, and therefore, should just die. An adherent of this position may believe that it would be fair for the victim’s family to decide the fate of the criminal since the criminal decided the fate of the victim. Another belief held would be that it is the job of the…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overcrowded Prisons

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When it comes down to it the death penalty should be used more often to get justice for these victims and their families. Many people argue today that the death penalty has killed innocent people. That being true that will not happen today. With science being as advance as it is today innocent men and women will no longer be sent to death for a crime they did not commit. With that being said the real criminal can be brought to justice so the victim and the victim’s family can have it too.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again. We need to consider our safety and stop these killers from committing more murders. Many people who are against the death penalty, of course, may want to question whether there is an alternative way to protect society without the use of capital punishment. Such as, putting the criminals in prison for life. Though I concede that putting away the felons can help, I still insist that murderers get the death penalty because it is the only way to 100% guarantee that they will never kill again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For most it 's the one everyone would guess; They say the Death Penalty is necessary because it serves as a warning to criminals, provides closure for the victims and the only punishment fit for murder? So murdering is fit for killing someone who has just murdered another person. ("English 15." English 15. N.p., 11 Nov.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a person commits an awful crime, it takes over society on many levels. It takes away many lives of victims, peace they deserve, and liberty from the society. Death penalty given as a severe punishment brings peace to society and punishes the criminal for his wrongs. Budziszewski states, “Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring this just order, making the wrongdoer pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done.” . Punishment also helps murder victims families become more less on their toes but rather justice will be served and they wont have to live in fear anymore.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The definition of capital punishment is “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime” (Merriam Webster Dictionary). To get a death penalty a criminal has to really do a disturbing crime, like the Orlando Massacre Shooting. I believe that this is a good way out because the state is getting rid of someone who doesn’t deserve to be alive. Statistics have shown that the death penalty can really bring peace to victims or the family members of the victim. The famous quote “an eye for an eye” simply means if…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are all equally entitled to our human rights without discrimination. My opponent tried to tell you that it gives family 's closure, and because of the acts committed by the inmate it cause them to have to seek medical attention. However this isn 't always the case. Many people and in particular a woman called Judy Kerr sister of a murder victim said, and I quote, many people have unsolved homicides and oppose the death penalty, because they recognize the resources were spending in the death penalty could much better be spent on prevention, deterrence, public safety and on finding the killers. We could use the money used on the death penalty for medical treatment for these destroyed family 's, and find the killers of the cold cases, thus giving them closure.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves people’s lives.” − George Walker Bush. There are some crimes that are so horrific that only the death of the perpetrator can assure the innocents in society that they will be safe from someone who has demonstrated not only their capability to murder, but their complete and utter…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty helps the families of the victim, and/or the victim too, get closure and they can move on. Retribution is the strongest argument for the capital punishment. "Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death...…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The officials say that the death penalty is used to get vengeance for the family that had just lost a loved one and that is the reason why the death penalty is mostly used for murder crimes or criminals, even though the death penalty is used for mostly vengeance the lawyers and officers say that the death penalty should not be used since killing the criminal will not bring the victim back to life. Many police officers say that the death penalty should not be used because the criminal that is being put on the death penalty is just trying to take a quick way out of life without killing themselves the officers say that the death should not be used and that the criminals should serve a life time and that they should die in jail for all of the killing that the criminal has done. Police officers say that it will cost more money for them to do the death penalty since the penitentiary or the prison has to by the lethal injection which cost the jail a lot of money and the jail gets the money from the state. It will not cost as much money for the jail or the penitentiary if the prisoner had to only serve a lifetime instead of having to by the lethal…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays