Marx Theory Of Reification Analysis

Improved Essays
Georg Lukács concept of reification refers to the reduction of people to things. As Lukacs states in History and Class Consciousness, this reification is “crucial for the subjugation of men’s consciousness” (Lukacs 1923). Reification essentially objectifies and reduces human beings to things. This concept of reification is directly linked to Marx’s ideas about commodity fetishism. Capitalist exfoliation establishes the workers and products of their labor as objects. It is further developed in human relations as people are unable to see themselves in relation with others; thus, human relationships are also objectified. Lukacs argues this concept of reification is applicable to all aspects of life as things and relationships become abstract. …show more content…
Such transformation eventually leads to the good being sold in market which creates its value. Thus, the value exists in relation to other things in the market. However, Marx states that, “a commodity is” essentially “a mysterious thing” (Marx 1867) such that the labor time and social processes invested in it are often hidden from the worker. Therefore, people are alienated from labor, things, and relations with other people. This alienation eventually leads to the worker fetishizing commodities more than social relations. The concept of reification is quite similar to Marx’s idea of commodity fetishism. It's a form of objectivity where the proletariat is detached from the fruits of its labor. It is related to Marx’s idea of commodity fetishism through the alienation that they describe. This alienation is evident in Marx’s commodity fetishism as well as Lukács reification. Further, they argue that this alienation is a major problem of capitalism that needs to be addresses. Both reification and commodity fetishism alienate the worker and establish human beings as objects. The development of class consciousness is how the worker is able to overcome this …show more content…
In order to fight for the revolution, the working class needs to become aware of its exploitation. Class consciousness will then compel the worker to overcome isolation and oppression in a capitalist society. Lukács argues that, “reification can be found in all the social forms of modern capitalism” (Lukács 1923). However, only the proletariat can rise up to challenge reification. Further, he argues that this consciousness which is situated in proletariat is due to historical circumstances. Referring to Marx’s historical dialects, he states that that, “consciousness is nothing but the expression of historical necessity” (Lukács 1923). This historical necessity of consciousness compels the proletariat to realize the contradictions and irrationality of a given capitalist society. As the proletariat becomes aware of this irrationality, it will seek to transform society as a communist state. Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it. This contradiction of the capitalist society is essential to its decline. This decline while not really a transformative revolution but over time will allow the proletariat to rise in power. Therefore, class consciousness is the essential characteristic of revolutionary politics. The transformation of society through the communist revolution will only arise

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this piece, Marx discusses the concept of “Estranged Labour”, about which he goes into great detail. He begins by stating that the current political economy takes the worker from the level of a human, to that of a commodity. He describes this as “the most wretched of commodities”, as the commodification of the worker is always done in contrast to success of the land owner. This creates two classes, the property owners and the propertyless workers, with a stark distinction between the two. The political economy that creates this distinction is run by greed, which is fueled by competition.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The estrangement of man from an other, is understood in how man sees the other. As Marx famously states in the beginning of the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (473). This quote is meant to illustrate the historical and hostile dichotomy of bourgeois and proletarian relations, of working class and ruling…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commodification is the process by which material objects are turned into marketable goods with monetary value based on equivalent commodities. In relation, the Marx idea of commodity fetishism is related to this by which all value is derived from an abstract unknowable meaning, and the original meaning or use is absolutely gone. Commodification is evident Ed Kienholz’s watercolor artworks. In exchange for a service or material possession, he would offer a watercolor painting as payment. He was able to achieve this by having enough fame that artwork was considered valueable.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1) What, according to Marx in The Communist Manifesto, must one understand in order to understand the course of historical development? What, in other words, is it that moves history along? The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1).…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Karl Marx (2003) talks about labour in a political economy, he argues that the workers are “degraded to the most miserable sort of commodity” (p. 6)—in other words, the workers are being exploited by owners of private property. He introduces the concept of alienation, describing how workers become externalized not only from their labour and the product of their labour, but also from their species’ being and other workers. This, as a result reduces the workers’ capabilities of seeking their greatest potential, leaving them powerless. While Marx is able to explain how alienated labour is developed, are the ideas around alienation only confined to labour? This paper will discuss the ways in which alienation is conceptualized and applied…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This leads to alienation from the work process; this is intimately connected to alienation from the product but rather focuses on how the process is inherently alienating in itself (Marx, 1844). Consequently the focus is not on the disconnect to the final product (Pappenheim, 1959). This is perhaps the most straightforward way in which our species being is being violated. As has been outlined, capitalism creates specialisation, the mechanisation of the human. What defines prosperity under Marxism is the opposite.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Midterm: Part One Karl Marx is known for his work on commodity fetishism. A commodity is an object considered to be merchandise or a possession. Marx referred to a commodity as having its’ exchange value determined by how much labor and time was put into producing that certain object or desired item. The fetishism part of a commodity is defined as the habitual act of characterizing commodities with possessing qualities that are human-like or larger than life. Marx sees commodity fetishism as people defining themselves by the things they own.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to resolve this class conflict, both men combined their ideas in the manifesto to illustrate the struggles of the industrial proletariat class and to unify and motivate the common people to revolt in order to escape poverty and exploitation from capitalism. (Aslund) According to Marx, he believed that the main characteristic of life in a class society is “alienation” and that the concept of capitalism produced not only alienation but also exploitation. Therefore, he believed that that communism would instead provide “ a vehicle for overcoming alienation by allowing the workers to feel a sense of ownership over the product of their labor after the overthrow of capitalism.”…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To overcome the bourgeoisie particularism, there is a need to end political power (Harrison 2014 p. 30). With such continuous possession of the state power by the bourgeoisie, this proposes the object of revolutionary subjectivity (Harrison 2014 p. 31). According to Marx and Engels, they believed the way to maintain the shared views of the proletariats’ struggle would be to win the battle of democracy and shifting the position of the proletariat to a position of the ruling class (Harrison 2014 p.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays